Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorEliminating Paradox-Deepening Traps

To promote water conservation, the city of Aethelgard replaced its traditional single-rate water billing—where residents paid a constant price for every gallon used—with a tiered system. Under the new system, a severe financial surcharge is added to the price of any residential water used beyond a newly established "conservation threshold." In the first year under this new system, despite a stable population and normal weather patterns, total residential water consumption in Aethelgard increased by 20 percent.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent paradox?

  1. The conservation threshold was set significantly higher than the city’s historical average for household usage, and the base price for water consumed below this threshold was drastically reduced from the old single rate.Cevap
  2. B
    The surcharge applied to usage above the threshold was so financially punitive that consumer watchdogs reported widespread anxiety among residents about exceeding the limit.
  3. C
    Because Aethelgard's housing stock is primarily composed of older homes with outdated plumbing, a significant number of residents found it impossible to reduce their water consumption below the new threshold.
  4. D
    During the same one-year period, neighboring cities that maintained their traditional single-rate billing systems saw their residential water consumption increase by an average of 35 percent.
  5. E
    Commercial and industrial water consumption, which combined account for a far greater percentage of the city’s total water use than residential consumption, declined sharply after a separate commercial surcharge was introduced.

Cevap

The statement explaining that the threshold was set higher than average and the price for water below the threshold was reduced.
The correct answer reconciles the discrepancy by explaining the economic incentive created by the new policy. If the threshold was generous (above average usage) and the cost of water below that threshold was significantly lowered, most residents experienced a price decrease for their marginal water consumption. This lower price incentivized them to use more water up to the threshold, thereby driving up the total residential water consumption despite the penalties that existed for extreme overuse.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the components of the paradox.
A policy designed to reduce residential water usage (by imposing a severe surcharge on excess use) paradoxically resulted in a 20% increase in total residential usage, despite stable population and weather.
Clearly defining the conflicting premises is required before evaluating how an answer choice bridges the gap.
2
Determine the criteria for a correct resolution.
The correct answer must introduce a new fact that explains how the tiered system itself inadvertently incentivized an overall increase in water use.
A true resolution must account for both the existence of the penalty and the subsequent rise in consumption.
3
Evaluate the options for Paradox-Deepening Traps.
Eliminate the option regarding 'widespread anxiety' over the punitive surcharge, as extreme fear of the penalty would lead to less water usage, making the 20% increase even more baffling.
Recognizing options that exacerbate the discrepancy is a core skill in resolving paradoxes.
4
Select the option that provides a complete mechanical resolution.
Select the option indicating a lowered base rate and high threshold.
By lowering the cost for the majority of water consumed, the city accidentally created a financial incentive for the average resident to use more water than before, perfectly explaining the overall increase.

Anahtar Kavram

Resolving a paradox requires introducing a premise that allows both sides of the seemingly contradictory stimulus to coexist naturally, while carefully avoiding traps that make the conflict worse.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Eliminating Paradox-Deepening Traps

Bu konudan daha fazla soru