Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: ZorMethod of Reasoning

Historian of science: Proponents of the "purity criterion" in art conservation advocate completely removing all 19th-century varnish coatings from Renaissance oil paintings on the grounds that these layers were applied after the original artists' deaths. However, archival chemistry demonstrates that over centuries, these varnish layers chemically fused with the underlying upper pigment glaze. Consequently, stripping the varnish inevitably extracts original pigment particles as well. Therefore, adhering strictly to the purity criterion directly undermines the core goal of preserving the artwork's historical authenticity.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the method of reasoning employed in the historian of science's argument?

  1. A
    denying the truth of the opponents' initial factual claim that the varnish layers were added subsequent to the artists' lifetimes
  2. B
    refuting an opponent's causal hypothesis by presenting a competing scientific explanation for why pigment degradation occurs
  3. demonstrating that implementing a proposed standard produces consequences that defeat the fundamental objective the standard was meant to advanceCevap
  4. D
    inferring that because preserving original pigment ensures authenticity, any historical modification necessarily causes the total loss of authenticity
  5. E
    concluding that no physical restoration technique of any kind can ever be performed without completely destroying an artwork

Cevap

The argument proceeds by demonstrating that implementing a proposed standard produces consequences that defeat the fundamental objective the standard was meant to advance.
The author focuses on the goal of the 'purity criterion' (historical authenticity) and demonstrates that the physical consequence of following its recommendation (stripping the varnish, which also strips pigment) directly subverts that very goal. The statement accurately abstracts this technique as showing that applying a proposed standard defeats the fundamental objective that standard is intended to achieve.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the opponent's position and justification
Proponents argue for removing 19th-century varnish coatings under the 'purity criterion' to protect historical authenticity because the coatings were added after the artists died.
Identifying the target view and its stated underlying objective is necessary to understand the purpose of the policy.
2
Analyze the evidence introduced by the author
The author provides a chemical fact: stripping the fused varnish inevitably removes original pigment particles along with it.
This establishes the physical mechanism that leads to an unintended practical outcome.
3
Evaluate the main conclusion and its relation to the opponent's objective
The author concludes that strictly following the criterion undermines the very authenticity it aims to preserve.
The argumentative technique is an internal refutation/reductio showing that the recommended course of action directly subverts its own stated purpose.

Anahtar Kavram

Method of Reasoning: Self-Defeating / Pragmatically Inconsistent Proposals
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Method of Reasoning

Bu konudan daha fazla soru