Philosopher: True moral progress requires that a society not merely adopt egalitarian laws, but that its citizens eventually internalize the principles of justice underlying them. Yet, whenever societies have rapidly implemented sweeping egalitarian legal reforms, the citizens' initial compliance with the new laws has been motivated primarily by fear of punitive state sanctions rather than an understanding of justice. Therefore, rapid sweeping legal reform is fundamentally incompatible with true moral progress.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the philosopher's argument depends?
- AIf a society's citizens eventually internalize the principles of justice underlying egalitarian laws, then that society has achieved true moral progress.
- BNo society that uses punitive state sanctions to enforce its laws can ever achieve true moral progress.
- Citizens do not subsequently internalize the principles of justice underlying laws with which they initially complied primarily out of a fear of punitive state sanctions.Cevap
- DGradual implementation of egalitarian legal reforms is more effective than rapid implementation at fostering an initial understanding of justice among citizens.
- ECitizens whose compliance with a new law is motivated by fear of punitive state sanctions are incapable of understanding any principles of justice.
Cevap
The correct answer is the option stating that citizens do not subsequently internalize the principles of justice underlying laws with which they initially complied primarily out of a fear of punitive state sanctions.
The philosopher concludes that rapid sweeping legal reform is fundamentally incompatible with true moral progress. The stated premises are that true moral progress requires citizens to eventually internalize the principles of justice, and that rapid reform historically causes citizens to initially comply with laws out of fear rather than understanding. The argument leaps from 'initial compliance based on fear' to a failure to achieve 'eventual internalization' (which is required for moral progress). For the conclusion to hold, it must be assumed that initial compliance out of fear prevents the subsequent internalization of those principles. If we negate this correct option—supposing that citizens DO subsequently internalize the principles despite initially complying out of fear—the conclusion that rapid reform is fundamentally incompatible with moral progress would logically collapse. Therefore, this assumption is strictly necessary.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Necessary Assumption and the Negation Test
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s