City Planner: The community board's proposal to rezone the waterfront district should be rejected. The board's chairperson owns a significant amount of commercial property just outside the proposed rezoning area, so she stands to benefit financially if development is restricted along the waterfront.
Statement: The city planner's argument is logically flawed because it rejects the community board's recommendation strictly by pointing out the chairperson's vested financial interest, ignoring the actual viability of the rezoning plan itself.
Cevap: Cevap
Cevap
True
The city planner commits a source argument fallacy (specifically, a circumstantial ad hominem) by rejecting the rezoning plan based strictly on the potential financial gain of the board's chairperson. The statement to be evaluated accurately identifies this exact flaw, making it true.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Ad Hominem (Source Argument - Circumstantial)