Read the following argument, then evaluate the statement below it.
Political Commentator: In any robust democracy, the ruling party will inevitably face plummeting approval ratings during an economic recession. The ruling Coalition Party is currently facing plummeting approval ratings amidst a severe economic recession. Therefore, despite recent claims to the contrary by international observers, it is clear that our country remains a robust democracy.
Statement: The commentator's reasoning is flawed because it infers that a certain political condition is absent merely on the grounds that a condition sufficient to guarantee its presence is absent.
Cevap: Cevap
Cevap
The statement is False.
The statement is false because it describes the wrong logical fallacy. The statement describes an 'illegal negation' (inferring something is absent because a sufficient condition is absent). However, the argument explicitly concludes that a condition (robust democracy) is present. The argument actually commits an 'illegal reversal' by treating a necessary result (plummeting ratings) as sufficient evidence to prove the initial condition.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Distinguishing between descriptions of Illegal Reversals (Affirming the Consequent) and Illegal Negations (Denying the Antecedent) in conditional reasoning.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s