Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaPrinciple Questions

Dr. Vance, an independent research scientist serving on a regional forestry commission, recently voted against approving a lucrative commercial timber harvest plan in the Blackwood Valley, despite the timber revenues being earmarked to fund local public schools. Although the timber plan satisfied all baseline statutory environmental thresholds, Dr. Vance reasoned that the logging company’s environmental impact assessment relied exclusively on theoretical computer modeling rather than on-site field surveys of endangered local salamander populations. Because unverified modeling introduces an unacceptable risk of irreversible ecological harm, Dr. Vance concluded that approving the harvest would be irresponsible.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify Dr. Vance’s conclusion?

  1. A
    Theoretical computer modeling should never be utilized by regulatory bodies or commercial enterprises when estimating the environmental impacts of resource extraction.
  2. B
    Public regulatory commissions should reject any commercial development proposal whenever funding for essential civic institutions is made dependent on the project’s approval.
  3. A public official should not approve a commercial enterprise that introduces an unacceptable risk of irreversible ecological harm, even if that enterprise complies with statutory environmental standards and generates revenue for public institutions.Cevap
  4. D
    An official acts responsibly in approving a commercial resource extraction project only if that project poses no risk whatsoever of ecological disruption to local wildlife.
  5. E
    Regulatory approval of a commercial development plan must be granted whenever the commercial applicant fully complies with all baseline statutory environmental thresholds.

Cevap

The principle stating that a public official should not approve a commercial enterprise that introduces an unacceptable risk of irreversible ecological harm, even if it complies with statutory standards and generates revenue for public institutions, most helps to justify the conclusion.
The correct principle provides a direct bridge from the stated premises to the final conclusion. The argument establishes that the timber plan involves an unacceptable risk of irreversible harm because of unverified modeling, despite meeting statutory standards and offering public school revenue. The correct answer asserts that whenever an enterprise introduces an unacceptable risk of irreversible ecological harm, public officials should not approve it despite statutory compliance and institutional revenue. This universal rule makes the scientist's specific conclusion follow logically.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the conclusion and the supporting factual premises in the stimulus.
Conclusion: Approving the timber harvest would be irresponsible. Premises: The plan relies entirely on unverified modeling instead of on-site surveys, which poses an unacceptable risk of irreversible ecological harm, even though it satisfies statutory baselines and funds schools.
Principle-Justify questions require finding a rule that bridges the gap between descriptive factual premises and a normative judgment.
2
Identify the underlying logical gap between the factual condition and the evaluative judgment.
The argument assumes that when an activity creates an unacceptable risk of irreversible ecological harm due to unverified assessments, that risk overrides statutory compliance and financial benefits, rendering approval irresponsible.
A valid justifying principle must state that these specific conditions are sufficient to warrant withholding approval.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find a rule that supplies this sufficient link without exceeding scope or reversing logic.
The statement establishing that an official should not approve an enterprise carrying unacceptable risk of irreversible ecological harm regardless of statutory compliance or revenue generation completes the deductive chain.
This matches the exact conditions and directionality required to make the conclusion follow logically.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Premises and Normative Conclusions with Justifying Principles
Tahmini Süre:1m 20s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Principle Questions

Bu konudan daha fazla soru