Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: KolayFlaw in the Reasoning

Consider the following argument: 'Every time a new bakery opens in our neighborhood, crime rates drop slightly. Therefore, the smell of fresh bread must be deterring criminals.'

The reasoning in this argument is flawed because it relies on the testimony of an unreliable authority.

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

False
The given statement is false because it incorrectly identifies the argument's logical flaw. The argument commits a causal fallacy (confusing correlation with causation) by assuming that because two events happen simultaneously, one causes the other. It does not commit an appeal to authority fallacy, as no authorities or experts are mentioned in the text.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the argument to identify the premises and the conclusion.
The premise is that bakery openings and crime drops occur together. The conclusion is that the smell of fresh bread deters criminals.
Breaking down the argument is necessary to evaluate the logical link between the evidence and the final claim.
2
Identify the actual logical flaw in the relationship between the premises and the conclusion.
The argument incorrectly assumes a causal relationship (bread smell causes lower crime) solely based on a correlation (they happen at the same time).
Recognizing the true logical flaw allows us to evaluate whether the provided statement accurately describes it.
3
Compare the actual flaw to the flaw described in the statement.
The statement claims the flaw is relying on an unreliable authority, but no authority or expert is cited anywhere in the argument.
This comparison determines that the given statement incorrectly categorizes the argument's vulnerability.

Anahtar Kavram

Flaw in the Reasoning: Identifying Correlation vs. Causation
Tahmini Süre:45s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Flaw in the Reasoning

Bu konudan daha fazla soru