The city council should reject the proposed tax increase on local businesses. Proponents of the tax argue that it will fund necessary road repairs. However, the tax will actually force many small businesses to close. Since small businesses employ the majority of the city's residents, these closures would cause a massive spike in local unemployment. A spike in unemployment would ultimately decrease the total tax revenue the city collects.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument?
- The city council ought to vote against the proposed tax increase on local businesses.Cevap
- BThe proposed tax increase will lead to a significant rise in unemployment within the city.
- CAdvocates of the tax increase believe that the funds generated will be used to repair local roads.
- DA rise in unemployment will reduce the total amount of tax revenue that the city is able to collect.
- ELocal businesses are currently facing unprecedented economic challenges and cannot afford higher taxes.
Cevap
The correct answer states that the city council ought to vote against the proposed tax increase on local businesses.
The correct answer perfectly paraphrases the first sentence of the stimulus. The author's primary goal is to convince the reader that the city council should reject the tax increase, and all the subsequent sentences (about businesses closing, unemployment, and lost revenue) are presented as reasons to support this initial claim.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Identifying the main conclusion of an argument by distinguishing it from premises, intermediate conclusions, and background information.