The responsibility for funding wetland restoration must be transferred to state governments. Restoring these vital ecosystems demands substantial capital investment. Local municipalities, which have historically managed these environmental projects, are currently burdened with severe budget deficits. Consequently, local governments are entirely incapable of financing these conservation efforts independently.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument?
- State governments should assume the financial responsibility for restoring wetlands.Cevap
- BLocal governments lack the financial resources to independently fund wetland conservation efforts.
- CLocal municipalities have historically been tasked with managing environmental restoration projects.
- DWetland ecosystems cannot be saved unless substantial capital investments are made immediately.
- EState governments are the only entities capable of resolving the severe budget deficits faced by local municipalities.
Cevap
The main conclusion of the argument is that state governments should assume the financial responsibility for restoring wetlands.
The argument's primary purpose is to advocate for a shift in funding responsibility to the state level. The very first sentence makes this claim, and all subsequent sentences serve to support it by explaining why local municipalities can no longer bear the cost. The correct answer choice is a direct paraphrase of this opening sentence.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Identifying Main Conclusions