Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaParallel Flaw

Evaluate the flawed logic presented in the arguments below. Connect each specific argument to the generalized description of its underlying error.

  • Whenever a software development team relies heavily on automated testing, they produce highly stable applications. The new mobile app from Zenith Tech is highly stable, which proves that Zenith Tech's developers relied heavily on automated testing.Treats a condition that is sufficient to guarantee a particular outcome as if it were a condition necessary to achieve that outcome.
  • Historical data indicates that civilizations located near major river systems typically develop complex agricultural economies. It is therefore evident that settling near a major river system is what directly causes a civilization to develop a complex agricultural economy.Infers a causal relationship between two phenomena strictly based on an observed association.
  • Any student who receives personal tutoring in mathematics will pass the final exam. Unfortunately, David did not receive any personal tutoring in mathematics this semester. We can conclude that David will fail the final exam.Concludes that a result will not occur merely because a condition sufficient to bring about that result is not met.
  • Every single brick used in the construction of the historical monument is incredibly light and easy to carry. Therefore, the historical monument as a whole must be incredibly light and easy to carry.Presumes, without providing justification, that what is true of the constituent elements of a whole must also be true of the whole itself.

Cevap

The arguments match their abstract flaws as follows: The software testing argument matches treating a sufficient condition as necessary. The river civilization argument matches inferring causation from association. The math tutoring argument matches concluding a result will not occur because a sufficient condition is absent. The brick monument argument matches assuming a characteristic of parts applies to the whole.
Each argument contains a distinct, identifiable logical error. The software argument affirms the consequent (illegal reversal). The river argument confuses correlation with causation. The tutoring argument denies the antecedent (illegal negation). The brick argument commits the fallacy of composition (part-to-whole). The correct pairings accurately align each argument's specific error with its generalized logical description.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the software development argument.
Identified a conditional reasoning flaw where the premise 'A implies B' is incorrectly reversed to 'B implies A' (affirming the consequent).
To match the argument with the generalized description of treating a sufficient condition as necessary.
2
Examine the river systems argument.
Identified a causal reasoning flaw where a correlation between rivers and agriculture is incorrectly treated as a definitive cause-and-effect relationship.
To find the abstract description describing causal inference drawn from mere association.
3
Analyze the mathematics tutoring argument.
Identified a conditional reasoning flaw where the premise 'A implies B' is incorrectly manipulated to 'Not A implies Not B' (denying the antecedent).
To match the argument with the description of concluding a result won't occur because a sufficient condition is absent.
4
Evaluate the historical monument argument.
Identified a composition flaw where the physical properties of a building's materials are improperly attributed to the building as a whole.
To find the abstract description of assuming parts apply unconditionally to the whole.

Anahtar Kavram

Parallel Flaw
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Parallel Flaw

Bu konudan daha fazla soru