Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorAd Hominem (Source Argument)

Political Commentator: Councilwoman Vance asserts that the proposed zoning deregulation will reduce average rent prices across the city. She bases this claim on a recently published economic model showing a historical correlation between reduced zoning restrictions and decreased housing costs in similar metropolitan areas. However, Vance's assertion is completely unfounded. As the primary shareholder in a massive real estate development firm, she stands to profit immensely from any deregulation. It is obvious that her motives are purely financial.

The reasoning in the political commentator's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it:

  1. A
    fails to recognize that a historical correlation between reduced zoning restrictions and decreased housing costs does not necessarily establish a causal relationship
  2. B
    assumes without justification that because a policy will financially benefit a specific individual in the city, it cannot also benefit the city as a whole
  3. rejects a conclusion by focusing on the vested interests of the person advancing that conclusion rather than engaging with the evidence offered in its supportCevap
  4. D
    attempts to undermine Vance's assertion by implying that the economic model she cites is factually inaccurate
  5. E
    mischaracterizes the councilwoman's reliance on the economic model as a deliberate attempt to obscure her underlying financial motivations

Cevap

The argument is flawed because it rejects a conclusion by focusing on the vested interests of the person advancing that conclusion rather than engaging with the evidence offered in its support.
The commentator's argument exhibits a classic Circumstantial Ad Hominem flaw. The commentator concludes that Vance's assertion (that deregulation will reduce rents) is false simply because Vance stands to profit from deregulation. The commentator completely ignores the actual evidence Vance provided (the economic model) and instead attacks her bias and motives. This structural flaw is perfectly described by the correct answer.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structure of the political commentator's argument.
Premise: Vance has a massive financial interest in deregulation. Conclusion: Vance's claim that deregulation will lower rents is 'completely unfounded.'
Identifying the premise and conclusion is the necessary first step to evaluating the reasoning.
2
Identify the logical flaw connecting the premise to the conclusion.
The commentator dismisses the factual validity of Vance's claim entirely based on her personal motives, without addressing the economic model she provided.
This is a classic circumstantial Ad Hominem (Source Argument) fallacy.
3
Evaluate the options to find the abstract description of this exact flaw.
The correct option perfectly describes dismissing a conclusion based on 'vested interests' rather than 'engaging with the evidence.'
The correct answer must accurately describe the structural flaw in the author's reasoning, not just any flaw present in the stimulus.

Anahtar Kavram

Ad Hominem (Source Argument)
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Ad Hominem (Source Argument)

Bu konudan daha fazla soru