Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorStrengthen

Match each logical argument (left) with the specific piece of evidence (right) that most powerfully strengthens its conclusion by resolving its core structural vulnerability.

  • An analysis revealed that companies allowing remote work saw a 15% increase in output per employee. Thus, working from home eliminates office distractions and directly boosts individual efficiency.Time-tracking logs indicate that the increased output did not result from remote employees simply working more hours, but rather from completing tasks at a significantly faster rate.
  • Immediately after the government lowered the capital gains tax, foreign investment in domestic tech startups doubled. Therefore, the tax cut successfully incentivized international investors.During this period, the global tech market experienced a severe downturn, precluding the possibility that the surge was driven by a worldwide increase in funding.
  • Because fragments of a rare meteor were found alongside fossilized dinosaur bones in the crater, the meteor impact must have been the direct cause of the sudden extinction in this region.Radiometric dating confirms that the meteor fragments and the topmost layer of fossils share an identical age, with no remains appearing in strata above the impact layer.
  • To combat urban heat islands, our city should mandate white reflective roofs, just as the city of Solaris did ten years ago to dramatically lower its ambient temperatures.Meteorological data confirms that both municipalities share virtually identical levels of annual solar irradiance, atmospheric humidity, and architectural density.

Cevap

The correct pairings are: Remote work (Left 1) with Time-tracking logs (Right 2); Tax cut (Left 2) with Global downturn (Right 3); Meteor impact (Left 3) with Radiometric dating (Right 4); and Urban heat roofs (Left 4) with Meteorological data (Right 1).
Each correct pairing directly addresses the unstated assumption in the argument. Left 1 is strengthened by Right 2 because it eliminates the alternative that productivity rose due to longer hours. Left 2 is strengthened by Right 3 because it eliminates the alternative of a global market boom. Left 3 is strengthened by Right 4 by proving the timeline supports causality. Left 4 is strengthened by Right 1 because it validates the analogy between the two cities.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze each argument to identify its conclusion and its underlying vulnerability (e.g., alternative causes, weak analogies).
Identified four distinct gaps: alternate cause for productivity, alternate cause for investment, temporal/causal gap in extinction, and relevance gap in the city analogy.
Understanding the specific flaw in an argument is necessary before one can identify the evidence that repairs it.
2
Evaluate the available evidence statements on the right to see which logically seals a corresponding gap.
Matched each evidence statement to an argument based on how it defends against a vulnerability (e.g., ruling out increased work hours to support efficiency).
Strengthening an argument often involves eliminating alternative explanations or confirming the validity of a comparison.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying and resolving structural vulnerabilities in causal and analogical reasoning.
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Strengthen

Bu konudan daha fazla soru