Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: ZorFlaw in the Reasoning

Tourism Director: It is impossible for a coastal region's tourism industry to thrive during the winter off-season unless there is a robust calendar of indoor cultural festivals. Over the past three years, our regional tourism board has heavily subsidized local arts organizations, increasing the number of winter events by 40 percent and thereby ensuring that our winter calendar is packed with highly publicized indoor cultural festivals. It is virtually guaranteed, then, that our region's winter tourism industry will soon see a dramatic revitalization and begin to thrive.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the tourism director's reasoning?

  1. It takes for granted that because a prerequisite for a certain outcome has been met, that outcome is guaranteed to occur.Cevap
  2. B
    It infers a causal relationship from an observed correlation between festival funding and tourism vitality.
  3. C
    It inappropriately infers an absolute level of economic success from a mere percentage increase in the number of winter events.
  4. D
    It assumes without providing justification that a 40 percent increase in events is enough to constitute a robust calendar.
  5. E
    It relies on an ambiguous use of the term "thrive" between the premise and the conclusion.

Cevap

It takes for granted that because a prerequisite for a certain outcome has been met, that outcome is guaranteed to occur.
The correct answer accurately identifies the conditional reasoning error in the stimulus. The director states that a robust festival calendar is a requirement ('impossible... unless') for a thriving winter tourism industry. The director then demonstrates that this requirement has been met and concludes that the tourism industry will therefore thrive. This treats a necessary condition (a prerequisite) as a sufficient condition (a guarantee).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural logic of the director's first sentence.
The phrase 'impossible... unless' creates a conditional relationship: if the winter tourism industry is to thrive, then there must be a robust calendar of indoor cultural festivals. The festival calendar is a necessary condition (a prerequisite).
Identifying conditional indicator words is crucial for mapping the argument's core structure.
2
Examine the premises provided to support the conclusion.
The director establishes that the necessary condition has been met: the tourism board has ensured that the winter calendar is packed with festivals.
Understanding what facts the author introduces helps determine how they are trying to prove their point.
3
Evaluate the conclusion drawn from the premises.
The director concludes that the winter tourism industry is 'virtually guaranteed' to thrive.
Comparing the premises to the conclusion reveals the logical leap.
4
Identify the logical disconnect between the premises and conclusion.
The director commits a conditional reasoning flaw by assuming that fulfilling a necessary condition (having the festivals) is sufficient to guarantee the result (thriving tourism).
A necessary condition is required for an outcome, but meeting it does not guarantee the outcome, as other necessary conditions (like affordable flights or good weather) may still be unmet.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Conditional Reasoning Flaws (Confusing Necessary and Sufficient Conditions)
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Flaw in the Reasoning

Bu konudan daha fazla soru