Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: ZorFlaw in the Reasoning

Political Sociologist: To foster genuine civic engagement, a local government must provide its citizens with transparent access to public records. When citizens lack this transparency, they inevitably become cynical about the political process and withdraw from public participation. The municipality of Oakhaven has recently overhauled its digital infrastructure, successfully guaranteeing complete public access to all municipal records. Consequently, Oakhaven is guaranteed to experience a resurgence in genuine civic engagement.

Which of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the political sociologist's reasoning?

  1. treats a condition that is necessary for bringing about a desired state of affairs as if it were a condition sufficient to bring about that state of affairsCevap
  2. B
    fails to consider that a condition capable of producing a certain effect may not be the only condition that can produce that effect
  3. C
    confuses a condition that is invariably correlated with a phenomenon as being the sole cause of that phenomenon
  4. D
    assumes without providing justification that the absence of a required condition inevitably leads to the absence of the desired outcome
  5. E
    draws a conclusion about a specific municipality based on a general principle that is established only for national governments

Cevap

The argument treats a condition that is necessary for bringing about a desired state of affairs as if it were a condition sufficient to bring about that state of affairs.
The sociologist's argument states that transparent access is 'must' or 'required' for civic engagement. In conditional logic, this makes transparency a necessary condition. The author then observes that Oakhaven has achieved this transparency and concludes that civic engagement is 'guaranteed' to happen. This relies on the flawed assumption that fulfilling a necessary condition is sufficient to guarantee the outcome, matching the abstract description perfectly.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditional statements in the premises.
Premise 1 establishes that Transparent Access is a requirement (necessary condition) for Genuine Civic Engagement. Premise 2 confirms the contrapositive: without Transparent Access, there is no Genuine Civic Engagement.
Identifying the formal logic structure is required to spot the exact logical gap in conditional reasoning.
2
Identify the argument's conclusion.
The conclusion states that because Oakhaven has achieved Transparent Access, it will definitely experience Genuine Civic Engagement.
Comparing the premises to the conclusion reveals how the author applies the evidence to reach their final claim.
3
Evaluate the logical connection between the premises and the conclusion.
The author affirms the necessary condition (Transparent Access) to conclude the sufficient condition (Civic Engagement), committing the fallacy of Affirming the Consequent.
This abstractly identifies the flaw needed to select the correct option.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Conditional Logic Flaws (Illegal Reversal / Confusing Necessary and Sufficient Conditions)
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Flaw in the Reasoning

Bu konudan daha fazla soru