The following text discusses various scholarly interpretations of Paleolithic cave art. Based exclusively on the attributions provided in the passage, match each researcher or school of thought with their respective hypothesis about the creation of the paintings.
Passage:
The study of Paleolithic cave art was long shaped by the theories of Abbé Henri Breuil, who championed the 'sympathetic magic' framework. Breuil posited that early humans depicted large herbivores to exert mystical control over their prey, guaranteeing successful hunts. Later, Max Raphael discarded this pragmatic view, arguing instead that the deliberate spatial arrangement of animal figures mirrored intricate social structures, with distinct species acting as emblems for allied clans. In recent decades, David Lewis-Williams has asserted that the abstract geometric signs and distorted fauna located in isolated cave chambers represent the records of shamanic trances, created by individuals documenting hallucinations from altered states of consciousness. Rejecting such deeply symbolic readings, R. Dale Guthrie points to forensic analyses of handprints and subject matter to contend that a significant portion of the imagery was the work of adolescent males depicting everyday preoccupations, essentially functioning as prehistoric graffiti.
- Abbé Henri BreuilThe illustrations were intended as a supernatural means of facilitating the acquisition of food.
- Max RaphaelThe positioning of animal depictions serves as a representation of societal structures and intergroup alliances.
- David Lewis-WilliamsThe images serve as a physical record of sensory experiences occurring outside of normal consciousness.
- R. Dale GuthrieThe artwork largely consists of mundane expressions by young individuals rather than profound symbolic artifacts.