Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: ZorPrinciple Questions

The Municipal Transit Oversight Board recently overturned a decision by the City Transportation Department to deploy an automated route-optimization algorithm designed by a private vendor. The department demonstrated that the algorithm would measurably reduce passenger wait times across all bus lines without increasing operational expenditures. Nevertheless, because the proprietary algorithms underlying the software prevent the department from explaining to affected neighborhoods precisely why specific transit stops were rescheduled or consolidated, the oversight board correctly concluded that the deployment should be suspended.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the oversight board's conclusion?

  1. A
    If a public agency can adequately explain to affected community members why service modifications were made, it is obligated to deploy the technology that produces those modifications.
  2. B
    A municipal oversight board should suspend the deployment of a new administrative policy only if that policy has failed to demonstrate measurable operational improvements.
  3. A public administrative agency should not adopt an automated system altering public services if doing so prevents the agency from explaining the specific rationales for those alterations to the affected public.Cevap
  4. D
    No technological innovation developed by a commercial vendor should ever be utilized in the governance or administration of public municipal transit systems.
  5. E
    Private software vendors contracting with municipal authorities should be legally required to make proprietary source code accessible to public oversight committees.

Cevap

A public administrative agency should not adopt an automated system altering public services if doing so prevents the agency from explaining the specific rationales for those alterations to the affected public.
The correct principle establishes a conditional rule: If an automated service-delivery system prevents an agency from explaining specific service alterations to the public, then that system should not be adopted. When applied to the facts in the stimulus—where the proprietary algorithm prevented the transit department from explaining rescheduled stops to affected neighborhoods—the principle directly yields and justifies the oversight board's conclusion to suspend deployment.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the premises and the conclusion in the argument.
Premise: The algorithm improves efficiency (reduces wait times with no extra cost). Premise: The proprietary nature of the algorithm makes it impossible for the department to explain specific route changes to affected neighborhoods. Conclusion: The deployment of the algorithmic system should be suspended.
Principle-justify questions require identifying the logical gap between the factual premises and the normative conclusion.
2
Identify the normative assumption needed to justify the conclusion.
The argument assumes that administrative transparency and explainability to affected service users take precedence over operational efficiency, such that an inability to explain changes justifies not deploying the system.
Connecting the lack of explainability directly to the impermissibility of deployment is necessary to validate the board's ruling.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find the principle that provides a sufficient bridge.
The principle stating that an agency should not adopt an automated system if it cannot explain the rationales for service alterations to the affected public perfectly bridges the factual premise to the conclusion.
A valid justifying principle must create a rule whose antecedent matches the stimulus condition and whose consequent guarantees the conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying a sufficient governing principle that bridges factual premises about administrative explainability to a normative judgment of procedural suspension.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Principle Questions

Bu konudan daha fazla soru