Corporate Strategist: A successful product launch in today’s highly saturated technology sector always requires an aggressive, well-funded marketing campaign. VertexCorp has just initiated an unprecedentedly aggressive, multi-million-dollar marketing campaign for its upcoming enterprise software suite. Therefore, despite the fierce competition in the industry, we can be highly confident that VertexCorp's new software suite will experience a remarkably successful product launch.
Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the corporate strategist's reasoning?
- It treats a condition that is necessary for a successful product launch as though it were a condition that ensures a successful product launch.Cevap
- BIt assumes that because a successful product launch requires an aggressive marketing campaign, the lack of a successful launch implies a lack of aggressive marketing.
- CIt identifies a condition that is sufficient to produce a remarkably successful product launch and mistakenly treats it as a condition that is necessary for such a launch.
- DIt mistakenly assumes that because two industry trends frequently occur together, one must be the direct cause of the other.
- EIt relies on a shift in the meaning of the term "aggressive" between the general principle and the specific application to VertexCorp.
Cevap
The correct answer accurately describes the argument treating a necessary condition as though it were a sufficient condition.
The argument explicitly states that a successful launch 'requires' an aggressive marketing campaign, establishing marketing as a necessary condition. It then observes that VertexCorp has satisfied this requirement and flawedly concludes that success is therefore highly confident (treating marketing as a sufficient condition or guarantee). The correct option accurately diagnoses this illegal reversal.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Identifying Illegal Reversal (Confusing Necessary and Sufficient Conditions)
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s