Soru

Zorluk: ZorNecessary Assumption

Archaeologist: Recent mass-spectrometry analysis of Late Bronze Age bronze artifacts recovered in southern Scandinavia revealed that their tin content matches the isotopic composition of tin deposits found exclusively in the Iberian Peninsula and southwestern Britain. Because copper ore was abundant locally in Scandinavian deposits, historians had assumed that Scandinavian metalworking communities operated within a self-sustaining regional exchange network. However, the presence of British and Iberian tin in these artifacts demonstrates that Scandinavian societies engaged in direct, long-distance maritime trade voyages to the Atlantic coast of Europe during this period.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the archaeologist's argument depends?

  1. A
    Scandinavian maritime vessels were technologically superior in cargo capacity to the vessels constructed by communities residing along the Atlantic coast.
  2. B
    Direct maritime voyages were the only mechanism by which any raw materials from southwestern Britain and Iberia could reach regions outside of western Europe during the Late Bronze Age.
  3. The Atlantic tin present in the Scandinavian bronze artifacts was not acquired entirely through a series of intermediate overland trade transactions across continental Europe.Cevap
  4. D
    If a Bronze Age society in northern Europe engaged in direct long-distance maritime trade, its metalworkers must have utilized imported tin rather than local mineral resources.
  5. E
    Late Bronze Age Scandinavian metalworkers had completely exhausted their local copper reserves before attempting to manufacture alloys using imported ores.

Cevap

The argument depends on the assumption that the Atlantic tin present in the Scandinavian bronze artifacts was not acquired entirely through a series of intermediate overland trade transactions across continental Europe.
The archaeologist draws a direct link between the physical presence of Iberian and British tin in Scandinavia and direct Scandinavian maritime voyages. For this conclusion to hold, it must not be the case that the ore reached Scandinavia via down-the-line overland intermediary trade across central Europe. Negating the statement about intermediary overland transactions directly refutes the claim of direct maritime voyages, confirming that the argument strictly depends on this assumption.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the premises and the conclusion in the archaeologist's argument.
Premises: Scandinavian bronze artifacts contain tin matching the unique isotopic signature of British and Iberian deposits; local Scandinavian copper was plentiful. Conclusion: Scandinavian societies engaged in direct, long-distance maritime trade voyages to the Atlantic coast.
Identifying the argument structure clarifies the exact logical leap between the evidence and the main claim.
2
Identify the unstated logical gap (the missing link).
The archaeologist infers direct Scandinavian travel to the source solely from the physical presence of foreign ore in Scandinavian artifacts, overlooking the possibility of indirect acquisition via continental intermediaries.
A necessary assumption must eliminate alternative explanations that would sever the link between foreign artifacts and direct travel by the recipient society.
3
Apply the Negation Test to candidate statements.
Negating the statement regarding intermediate trade yields: 'The Atlantic tin was acquired entirely through intermediate overland trade transactions across continental Europe.' This negation completely destroys the archaeologist's conclusion that direct maritime voyages took place.
A statement is strictly necessary to an argument if and only if its logical negation fatally undermines the conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary Assumption (Defender Assumption eliminating alternative mechanisms of acquisition)
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Bu soruyu puanla