Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorFlaw in the Reasoning

Policy Analyst: A thriving local economy fundamentally depends upon a robust public transportation network. If a municipality fails to maintain reliable bus and commuter rail services, local businesses will inevitably struggle to attract both consumers and a qualified workforce. Over the past decade, the municipality of Oakhaven has allocated unprecedented funding toward expanding and upgrading its public transit infrastructure, resulting in the most reliable and expansive network in the region. Consequently, Oakhaven is guaranteed to experience a prolonged era of significant economic growth and a thriving local economy.

The reasoning in the policy analyst's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument:

  1. A
    infers that a characteristic belonging to the region's transportation network as a whole must also apply to each individual transit line within that network
  2. B
    takes for granted that Oakhaven's local businesses were actively struggling to attract consumers prior to the recent infrastructure investments
  3. draws a definitive conclusion by treating the fulfillment of an indispensable precondition for a phenomenon as though it were sufficient to ensure that phenomenonCevap
  4. D
    relies on an ambiguous shift in the meaning of the phrase 'thriving local economy' between the initial premises and the final conclusion
  5. E
    overlooks the possibility that a municipality might achieve a thriving local economy even if it completely lacks a robust public transportation infrastructure

Cevap

The correct option is the one that identifies the confusion between a necessary condition and a sufficient condition.
The analyst's argument relies on flawed conditional logic. The opening sentence establishes that a robust public transportation network is a necessary condition for a thriving local economy (the economy 'depends upon' it). The argument then establishes that Oakhaven has successfully fulfilled this necessary condition. However, the conclusion asserts that Oakhaven is 'guaranteed' to experience a thriving economy. This is a logical fallacy: fulfilling a requirement (an indispensable precondition) does not mean the outcome is guaranteed (sufficient to ensure). The correct option accurately describes this error in abstract terms.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core premises and their logical relationships.
The first premise states that a thriving economy 'depends upon' a robust transportation network. This establishes that a robust network is a necessary condition for a thriving economy.
Understanding the conditional indicators (like 'depends upon' and 'fails to') is crucial for mapping the argument's logic.
2
Identify the conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is that because Oakhaven has achieved a robust transportation network, it is 'guaranteed' to experience a thriving local economy.
The conclusion is the main claim that the author is trying to prove and where the logical leap occurs.
3
Compare the premises to the conclusion to find the logical gap.
The author takes a condition that was established as necessary (the robust network) and treats it as if its presence is sufficient to guarantee the outcome (the thriving economy).
Having a necessary ingredient does not guarantee the final result if other necessary ingredients are missing.
4
Select the option that matches this abstract description of the flaw.
The correct option states that the argument treats the 'fulfillment of an indispensable precondition' (necessary condition) as 'sufficient to ensure that phenomenon'.
This abstract wording perfectly describes the Illegal Reversal committed by the analyst.

Anahtar Kavram

Flaw in the Reasoning: Confusing Necessary and Sufficient Conditions
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Flaw in the Reasoning

Bu konudan daha fazla soru