Below are three distinct decisions made under specific professional circumstances. Which general principle most directly justifies each decision?
- An engineer reports company records of illegal toxic waste dumping directly to public environmental regulators despite having signed an employee non-disclosure agreement.An individual's duty to protect public welfare overrides contractual obligations of organizational confidentiality.
- A software developer releases computer code to the public free of charge on the sole condition that any modified redistributions display the original author's name.Creators who waive monetary compensation for their work may still legitimately require proper acknowledgment of authorship.
- A freight carrier is excused from paying standard delay penalties after an unexpected severe earthquake destroys the only access route to the delivery destination.Contractual performance penalties should not be enforced when unforeseen natural catastrophes render fulfillment impossible.
Cevap
The whistleblowing scenario matches the principle prioritizing public welfare over organizational secrecy; the open-source licensing scenario matches the principle preserving author attribution despite waived payment; and the freight delay scenario matches the principle excusing non-performance caused by unforeseen natural disasters.
Each decision is matched with a general normative rule whose conditions are fully satisfied by the scenario: reporting toxic waste despite secrecy rules matches prioritizing public welfare; conditioning free software on credit matches preserving attribution rights; and forgiving late fees due to earthquake damage matches excusing non-performance caused by natural disasters.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Principle Identification and Application
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s