An organizational ethicist asserts: A business entity attains true ethical leadership only if it implements fair-trade sourcing and guarantees a living wage for all workers. Implementing fair-trade sourcing requires the entity to comprehensively audit its supply network. Moreover, no business entity comprehensively audits its supply network without adopting a radical transparency framework.
Which one of the following logically follows from the ethicist's assertions?
- Any business entity that does not adopt a radical transparency framework fails to attain true ethical leadership.Cevap
- BAny business entity that adopts a radical transparency framework will attain true ethical leadership.
- CA business entity that fails to attain true ethical leadership also fails to guarantee a living wage for all workers.
- DMost business entities that comprehensively audit their supply networks also guarantee a living wage for all workers.
- EA business entity fails to attain true ethical leadership only if it fails both to implement fair-trade sourcing and to guarantee a living wage.
Cevap
The statement establishing that an entity failing to adopt a radical transparency framework will fail to attain true ethical leadership.
Based on the stimulus, we can build a conditional chain: True Ethical Leadership (TEL) requires Fair-Trade Sourcing (FTS), which requires Auditing the Supply network (CAS), which in turn requires a Radical Transparency framework (ART). Symbolically: TEL -> FTS -> CAS -> ART. A valid deduction must follow the rules of formal logic. The contrapositive of this chain is: If Not ART, then Not TEL. The correct answer matches this contrapositive perfectly, stating that failing to adopt radical transparency guarantees a failure to attain true ethical leadership.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Diagramming Conditional Chains and Applying the Contrapositive