The city council is proposing to replace all existing streetlights with new LED models. The council argues that this switch will reduce the city's annual streetlight operating budget. Their sole evidence is that the new LED models consume 40 percent less electricity per hour than the existing streetlights.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the city council's argument?
- AThe new LED streetlights require replacement parts that cost significantly more than the savings gained from the reduced electricity use.
- BBecause the LED models are highly efficient, the city plans to install twice as many streetlights as it currently operates.
- Maintenance costs, which make up a large portion of the operating budget, are significantly lower for the LED models than for the existing streetlights.Cevap
- DMany neighboring cities have already replaced their older streetlights with newer LED models.
- EIf a city successfully reduces its annual streetlight operating budget, it must have recently switched to LED models.
Cevap
Maintenance costs, which make up a large portion of the operating budget, are significantly lower for the LED models than for the existing streetlights.
The correct answer strengthens the argument by addressing a potential gap in the reasoning. The council assumes that the electricity savings will not be outweighed by other expenses. By explicitly stating that maintenance costs (another major part of the budget) will also be lower, this option confirms that the overall operating budget will indeed decrease, making the conclusion much more plausible.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Strengthening an argument by ruling out alternative disadvantages