Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaPrinciple Questions

The curator of an architectural heritage museum recently declined an offered donation of rare nineteenth-century stained-glass window panels, despite their exceptional historical value and the donor's commitment to fully underwrite their restoration. The curator reasoned that because the panels had been detached from a landmark cathedral without archival records establishing that the salvage was authorized at the time, displaying them in the museum would lend institutional legitimacy to undocumented removals of cultural property. Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the curator's decision?

  1. A
    A museum should never accept any donation of architectural fragments unless the prospective donor was the original legal owner of the structure from which the pieces were salvaged.
  2. B
    If an institution can verify that the removal of an antiquity was legally authorized, it is obligated to acquire that artifact whenever the donor provides full financial support for its conservation.
  3. A cultural institution should refuse to acquire an artifact, regardless of its historical importance or financial backing, if exhibiting it would validate unauthorized or unverified extractions of heritage items.Cevap
  4. D
    An institution is justified in accepting an antiquity only if it possesses documentation establishing an unbroken chain of custody since the item's fabrication.
  5. E
    Any cultural artifact whose historical extraction lacks contemporary documentation must be confiscated by municipal preservation authorities rather than maintained in private collections.

Cevap

A cultural institution should refuse to acquire an artifact, regardless of its historical importance or financial backing, if exhibiting it would validate unauthorized or unverified extractions of heritage items.
The correct principle provides a universal rule that directly connects the curator's factual premise (that displaying undocumented architectural salvage confers legitimacy on illicit removals) to the action taken (refusing the donation). By explicitly discounting countervailing factors like historical significance and financial underwriting, it makes the curator's rationale sufficient to justify the refusal.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the conclusion and supporting premises of the argument.
Conclusion: The curator was justified in declining the donation. Premises: The panels lack documentation of authorized salvage, and exhibiting them would confer legitimacy on undocumented removals of cultural property, despite high value and paid restoration.
Principle-justify questions require bridging the gap between the descriptive factual premises and the normative conclusion.
2
Identify the logical bridge needed to justify the curator's judgment.
A general normative rule establishing: If displaying an artifact risks validating undocumented or unauthorized removals, an institution ought to decline the acquisition, even if it is valuable and fully funded.
The rule must make the stated risk a sufficient reason to refuse the acquisition.
3
Evaluate the answer choices against the required conditional relationship and scope.
The statement specifying that cultural institutions should refuse acquisitions when exhibition validates unverified extraction directly subsumes the scenario and proves the conclusion.
It supplies the exact sufficient condition required without introducing irrelevant constraints or conditional errors.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying a general normative principle that bridges factual premises to an evaluative or administrative conclusion.
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Principle Questions

Bu konudan daha fazla soru