Tüm alıştırma soruları

3960 soru

Soru 161Soru →

Plant physiologist: When exposed to intense ultraviolet radiation, certain arid-zone succulents synthesize elevated concentrations of betalain pigments. It was long hypothesized that betalains protect chloroplast DNA from UV damage. However, recent laboratory trials demonstrated that mutant succulents incapable of producing betalains sustained no more UV-induced DNA fragmentation than did wild-type plants exposed to identical radiation levels. Thus, the production of betalains in these succulents must serve a purpose entirely unrelated to protection against ultraviolet radiation.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the plant physiologist's argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Betalains do not protect the succulents from varieties of ultraviolet-induced damage other than chloroplast DNA fragmentation.

Cevap

Betalains do not protect the succulents from varieties of ultraviolet-induced damage other than chloroplast DNA fragmentation.
The author concludes that betalain production is entirely unrelated to ultraviolet defense based solely on finding no effect on chloroplast DNA fragmentation. For this conclusion to stand, it is essential that betalains do not protect against any other manifestations of UV damage (such as photosystem degradation or membrane lipid peroxidation). Negating the correct statement establishes that betalains do protect against other forms of UV damage, which completely invalidates the conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the argument structure
Premise: Mutants lacking betalains show no greater UV-induced DNA fragmentation than wild-type plants. Conclusion: Betalain production must serve a purpose entirely unrelated to UV radiation protection.
Deconstructing the argument into premises and conclusion reveals the gap between the specific evidence and the broad claim.
2
Identify the logical leap
The author equates failing to protect against one specific type of damage (chloroplast DNA fragmentation) with providing no protection against ultraviolet radiation in general.
A necessary assumption must bridge this gap by eliminating other possible UV-protective functions.
3
Apply the Negation Test to candidate assumptions
Negating the statement produces: 'Betalains do protect the succulents from varieties of ultraviolet-induced damage other than chloroplast DNA fragmentation.' This directly shatters the conclusion that betalains serve no UV-protective purpose.
A statement whose negation destroys the author's conclusion is a necessary assumption of the argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary Assumption (Defender Assumption and Negation Test)
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 162Soru →

Elena: To reduce city traffic congestion and cut down on carbon emissions, the municipal government should eliminate fares on all public city buses. Making public transit completely free is the most effective incentive to get drivers out of their cars and onto buses.

Marcus: Eliminating fares will not solve our congestion problem. Most people drive because the bus routes are infrequent and unreliable, not because of the ticket price. If the city eliminates fares, transit revenue will collapse, preventing the city from making the necessary scheduling and route improvements needed to actually attract drivers.

Elena and Marcus's statements provide the strongest support for the claim that they disagree over which one of the following?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Eliminating bus fares would be an effective measure for reducing traffic congestion.

Cevap

Eliminating bus fares would be an effective measure for reducing traffic congestion.
The claim that eliminating bus fares would be an effective measure for reducing traffic congestion passes the two-speaker test cleanly. Elena explicitly argues that eliminating fares is the most effective incentive to reduce traffic congestion, whereas Marcus directly states that eliminating fares will not solve the city's congestion problem.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the first speaker's argument and identify their stated position.
Elena asserts that eliminating bus fares is the most effective incentive to get drivers onto buses and thereby reduce traffic congestion.
Point at issue questions require determining the explicit or committed stance of each speaker.
2
Analyze the second speaker's argument and identify their response to the first speaker's claim.
Marcus explicitly counters that eliminating fares will not solve the congestion problem, arguing that frequency and reliability matter more to drivers than ticket prices.
The correct point of disagreement must be an issue where one speaker says 'yes' (agrees) and the other says 'no' (disagrees).
3
Apply the two-speaker test to evaluate which statement captures their direct disagreement.
Elena believes fare elimination will effectively reduce congestion (YES), while Marcus believes it will not solve the congestion problem (NO).
A valid point of disagreement requires both speakers to take clear, opposing truth-value positions on the exact same proposition.

Anahtar Kavram

Point of Disagreement (Two-Speaker Test)
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 163Soru →

Marine Biologist: Benthic gastropods (*Alviniconcha*) residing near deep-sea hydrothermal vents in sulfide-rich plumes harbor chemosynthetic endosymbionts in their gill tissues and possess notably thicker shells than conspecifics inhabiting iron-dominated plumes, which consistently lack these endosymbionts. Because thicker shells confer greater structural defense against hydrostatic pressure, the biologist concludes that metabolic activity of the endosymbionts directly promotes shell thickening by concentrating dissolved calcium ions.

Statement: The finding that *Alviniconcha* specimens transferred from iron-dominated plumes to sulfide-rich plumes develop thicker shells only when their gill tissues become successfully colonized by chemosynthetic bacteria strengthens the marine biologist's argument.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement is true because the empirical finding isolates the presence of the endosymbionts from the ambient plume chemistry, showing that the physical environment alone does not trigger shell thickening without bacterial colonization. Eliminating this rival causal explanation substantially strengthens the marine biologist's conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument into its premises, unstated assumptions, and conclusion.
Premise: Gastropods in sulfide plumes have endosymbionts and thicker shells; gastropods in iron plumes lack both. Conclusion: Endosymbionts causally promote shell thickening. Key Gap: The observed correlation might be driven by the sulfide-rich environment itself rather than bacterial metabolism.
Identifying the inferential leap from correlation to causation allows targeted evaluation of potential strengtheners.
2
Analyze the logical impact of the supplementary experimental finding.
The finding shows that introducing the snail to the sulfide plume is insufficient on its own to produce thicker shells; shell thickening happens only when bacterial colonization succeeds.
This establishes covariation while holding environmental surroundings constant, ruling out the background water chemistry as an independent cause.
3
Judge whether the statement correctly characterizes the finding as a strengthener.
Because ruling out a major confounding explanation increases the plausibility of the author's causal claim, the finding does strengthen the argument, making the statement True.
A claim that eliminates a rival causal mechanism functions as a valid strengthener under LSAT standards.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening causal claims by ruling out confounding environmental variables and demonstrating controlled covariation
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 164Soru →

Any algorithmic trading system that prioritizes latency reduction will inevitably experience elevated order-cancellation rates, unless it utilizes predictive market-making models. However, systems utilizing predictive market-making models are never granted Tier-1 regulatory approval by the financial oversight board. The oversight board grants Tier-1 approval to most trading systems that do not experience elevated order-cancellation rates. Every algorithmic trading system developed by Apex Financial prioritizes latency reduction, yet Apex Financial currently operates several systems that have been granted Tier-1 regulatory approval.

Which one of the following statements must be true on the basis of the information above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Any algorithmic trading system developed by Apex Financial that currently holds Tier-1 regulatory approval experiences elevated order-cancellation rates.

Cevap

Any algorithmic trading system developed by Apex Financial that currently holds Tier-1 regulatory approval experiences elevated order-cancellation rates.
To find what must be true, we combine the facts provided about a specific subset of trading systems: those built by Apex Financial that hold Tier-1 approval. We know every Apex system prioritizes latency reduction. According to the first sentence, any system prioritizing latency reduction must either experience elevated order-cancellation rates or use predictive market-making models. However, because these specific Apex systems hold Tier-1 approval, the second sentence dictates that they cannot possibly be using predictive market-making models (since using them guarantees denial of Tier-1 status). Eliminating the predictive model exception leaves only one possibility: these Tier-1 approved Apex systems must experience elevated order-cancellation rates.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Map the formal logic of the general rules.
Rule 1: Prioritize Latency -> (Elevated Rates OR Predictive Models). Rule 2: Predictive Models -> NO Tier-1 Approval (which contraposes to: Tier-1 Approval -> NO Predictive Models).
Translating natural language into conditional logic allows for rigorous deduction.
2
Analyze the specific information given about Apex Financial's systems.
All Apex Systems -> Prioritize Latency. At least some Apex systems have Tier-1 Approval.
We must isolate the specific subset of subjects (Apex Tier-1 systems) to draw a guaranteed conclusion.
3
Apply Rule 2 to the subset of Apex systems with Tier-1 approval.
Because they have Tier-1 approval, these specific Apex systems cannot utilize predictive market-making models.
This establishes one absolute truth about the subset.
4
Apply Rule 1 to the same subset to deduce the final outcome.
Since these systems are built by Apex, they prioritize latency. Thus, they must either have elevated rates or use predictive models. Since Step 3 proved they do NOT use predictive models, they MUST have elevated cancellation rates.
This completes the logical chain, proving the correct inference.

Anahtar Kavram

Formal Logic Deductions, Conditional Chaining, and Existential Quantifiers
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 165Soru →

Ornithologist: Many evolutionary biologists have long maintained that the pigmentation of avian eggshells evolved primarily as camouflage to protect clutches from visual predators. However, several cavity-nesting bird species whose eggs are concealed within completely dark tree hollows consistently lay heavily speckled eggs, where crypsis confers no survival advantage against predators. Furthermore, recent biomechanical tests reveal that the specific pigment molecules involved significantly strengthen the crystalline matrix of the shell in calcium-scarce habitats. Therefore, structural reinforcement, rather than camouflage, was likely the initial evolutionary factor driving eggshell pigmentation.

Which of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the ornithologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Avian eggshell pigmentation was likely first selected for because it reinforced shell structure rather than because it provided camouflage.

Cevap

Avian eggshell pigmentation was likely first selected for because it reinforced shell structure rather than because it provided camouflage.
The correct answer accurately restates the argument's final deduction: that structural reinforcement, rather than crypsis (camouflage), was the original evolutionary driver of eggshell pigmentation. This overarching claim is logically supported by both the observation about cavity-nesting birds and the biomechanical data regarding calcium-poor habitats.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the opposing view and background context
The argument opens by noting the traditional view: eggshell pigmentation evolved primarily for camouflage against predators.
Recognizing the opposing position helps pinpoint where the author pivots to present their own thesis.
2
Isolate the supporting evidence and intermediate findings
The author presents two premises: cavity nesters lay speckled eggs despite no camouflage advantage, and pigments strengthen shells in calcium-deficient conditions.
Distinguishing supporting premises from the final conclusion prevents mistakenly selecting intermediate conclusions or supporting facts.
3
Extract the author's ultimate deduction
Introduced by the conclusion indicator 'Therefore,' the author asserts that structural reinforcement, not camouflage, was likely the initial evolutionary driver.
The main point must represent the final claim supported by all other evidence in the stimulus.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing the main conclusion from supporting premises and background counterarguments.
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 166Soru →

Read the following two passages regarding the theory of photography.

Passage A
The foundational epistemic authority of the photograph rests not on its mere visual verisimilitude—its capacity to resemble reality—but on its indexicality, which is its direct causal connection to the physical world. Unlike a painting, which is mediated entirely by the subjective hand of the artist and requires an active process of symbolic translation, a photograph is fundamentally a physical trace. Light reflected from an object strikes a photosensitive surface, leaving an objective, mechanically generated imprint. Even when a photographer exercises aesthetic judgment regarding framing, composition, or lighting, the resultant image remains inextricably tethered to the actual, historical presence of the subject before the lens. This chemical and optical inevitability endows the photograph with an irreducible evidentiary weight. It operates much like a footprint in the mud or a cast death mask; it is a direct material emanation of the real. Consequently, while viewers can certainly misinterpret the historical or social context of a photograph, the photograph itself cannot lie about the physical, spatial existence of the forms that patterned its surface at the exact moment of exposure. The camera functions as a mute, unthinking recording instrument, guaranteeing a baseline of unassailable fact.

Passage B
The enduring myth of photographic objectivity stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of the photographic apparatus as an autonomous, neutral mechanical witness. In reality, every photograph is a deeply ideological artifact, saturated from its inception with the subjective intentionality of its maker. The persistent assumption that the camera simply "captures" or "records" a preexisting reality ignores the myriad ways in which the photographic act is inherently constructive, rather than merely receptive. From the initial selection of the frame—which necessarily violently excludes the vast majority of the visual field—to the choice of focal length, exposure time, and subsequent darkroom or digital processing, the photographer continuously imposes a specific, highly biased syntax upon the world. The resulting image is not a passive, unmediated imprint of nature, but a highly codified text designed to persuade, emphasize, point, or obscure. To treat a photograph as a direct physical footprint of the real is to succumb to a dangerous naiveté regarding how visual communication operates. Because the optical apparatus itself was historically designed specifically to reproduce culturally specific Renaissance conventions of perspective, the resulting images only mimic an objective reality. Ultimately, a photograph’s evidentiary status is established not by its chemical or optical origins, but entirely by the institutional, political, and discursive contexts in which it is eventually presented and consumed.

Based on the passages, match each concept or assertion made by the author of Passage A (on the left) with how the author of Passage B would most likely evaluate or characterize that concept (on the right).

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

The camera functioning as a "mute, unthinking recording instrument"
The "irreducible evidentiary weight" inherently possessed by a photograph
The "chemical and optical inevitability" of the exposure process
The analogy of the photograph operating like a "footprint in the mud"

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct pairings map Author A's concepts to Author B's direct rebuttals: the 'mute recording instrument' matches the culturally designed apparatus (right_4); the 'evidentiary weight' matches the status established by institutional contexts (right_2); the 'chemical and optical inevitability' matches the operations saturated by subjective intentionality (right_1); and the 'footprint in the mud' analogy matches the dangerous naiveté confusing a codified text with a natural trace (right_3).
Each pairing relies on identifying the exact syntactic and conceptual counter-argument presented in Passage B to Passage A's premises. Author B addresses the camera as a cultural invention (countering the 'mute instrument'), the technical process as subjective (countering 'chemical inevitability'), the evidentiary status as socially constructed (countering 'inherent weight'), and the physical trace metaphor as naive (countering the 'footprint').

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Passage A's core arguments regarding the nature of photography.
Passage A argues that photography is an indexical, objective physical trace of reality (analogous to a footprint) created by a mute instrument, endowing the image with inherent evidentiary weight.
Understanding Author A's specific assertions establishes the baseline necessary to map Author B's targeted rebuttals.
2
Analyze Passage B's overarching counter-argument.
Passage B argues that photographs are highly constructed, ideological texts produced by an apparatus designed for subjective human perspective, and that their evidentiary status is purely a product of institutional context.
Establishing Author B's thesis provides the framework for inferring their precise stance on Author A's individual claims.
3
Match Passage A's view of the camera to Passage B's view.
Author A's description of a 'mute, unthinking recording instrument' perfectly aligns with Author B's critique of the apparatus as one designed to 'reproduce culturally specific... conventions of perspective'.
Author B specifically rejects the neutrality of the optical machine itself.
4
Match Passage A's view of the photographic process to Passage B's view.
Author A's 'chemical and optical inevitability' maps to Author B's assertion that the exposure and processing operations are 'saturated... with subjective intentionality' and 'highly biased syntax'.
Author B views the technical choices (focal length, processing) not as inevitable chemical reactions, but as deeply subjective interventions.
5
Match Passage A's specific 'footprint' analogy and 'evidentiary weight' claims to Passage B's specific rebuttals.
The 'footprint' analogy maps to Author B's claim of 'dangerous naiveté', while 'evidentiary weight' maps to Author B's claim that such status is established by 'institutional, political, and discursive contexts'.
Author B explicitly targets the footprint metaphor in the text and specifically redefines how evidentiary value is actually produced.

Anahtar Kavram

Cross-Author Inference in Comparative Reading requires synthesizing the theoretical framework of one author to logically deduce their specific, targeted critique of the opposing author's premises and analogies.
Tahmini Süre:3m 30s
Soru 167Soru →

Ecologist: Over the past decade, populations of the yellow-bellied marmot in a subalpine valley have emerged from hibernation an average of three weeks earlier than they did thirty years ago. Some researchers attribute this shift primarily to rising spring temperatures. However, during the same thirty-year period, local winter snowpack depth decreased by nearly forty percent, exposing burrow entrances to direct sunlight much earlier in the season. Because marmots awaken primarily in response to ambient light penetrating their burrow entrances rather than ambient air temperature, the earlier emergence is almost certainly a result of reduced snowpack rather than warmer air.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the ecologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: In neighboring subalpine valleys where spring temperatures increased at similar rates but winter snowpack depth remained constant, marmot emergence dates did not advance significantly.

Cevap

The statement showing that marmot emergence dates did not change in valleys where temperatures rose but snowpack remained constant most strengthens the argument.
The argument concludes that reduced snowpack (which permits light penetration), rather than rising air temperature, is the cause of earlier marmot emergence. The correct choice provides a comparative control case: where air temperature rose but snowpack depth remained historically constant, marmot emergence did not shift. By showing that the effect does not occur in the absence of the author's proposed cause, even when the rival cause is present, this choice effectively rules out air temperature as the driving factor and bolsters the ecologist's conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and premises of the argument
Conclusion: The earlier emergence is almost certainly caused by reduced snowpack rather than warmer air. Premises: Marmots emerge 3 weeks earlier; snowpack decreased by 40%; marmot awakening is triggered primarily by light penetrating burrow entrances rather than ambient air temperature.
Understanding the precise causal relationship claimed by the author is essential to finding the most supportive evidence.
2
Identify the logical gap or competing explanation
The rival explanation claims that rising spring temperatures caused the earlier emergence. The author dismisses this, attributing the change to reduced snowpack/light.
Strengthening a causal argument typically involves ruling out an alternative cause or demonstrating that the effect does not occur when the proposed cause is absent.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to identify the strongest supportive claim
The choice providing a control group (temperature increased but snowpack depth remained constant, resulting in no shift in emergence) directly demonstrates that temperature increases alone are insufficient to advance emergence dates.
Showing that the effect is absent when the suspected cause (reduced snowpack) is absent, despite the presence of the rival cause (warm temperatures), strongly validates the author's causal conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening a Causal Claim via Elimination of an Alternative Cause
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 168Soru →

The following two passages explore the evolutionary origins of human rhythmic entrainment.

Passage A
The human capacity for entrainment—the ability to physically synchronize to an external auditory beat—is remarkably rare among mammals. While some evolutionary theorists posit that this capacity emerged as a direct adaptation for social bonding, a more parsimonious explanation views human rhythm as an evolutionary byproduct, or spandrel, of bipedal locomotion. The transition to upright walking was a biomechanical revolution that demanded complex, highly regular neurological timing mechanisms simply to maintain physical balance and coordinate alternating limb movements. Over millions of years, as these crucial oscillatory neural networks became deeply established in the hominid motor cortex, they were subsequently co-opted by the auditory system. This cross-wiring allowed early humans to process and physically respond to periodic acoustic patterns. Thus, under this framework, our profound physiological response to a musical beat is not a specialized adaptation for group cohesion, but essentially a neurological echo of our ancestors' adaptation to walking. The ability to keep a beat was never selected for its own sake; rather, it hitched a ride on the crucial evolutionary imperative of navigating the savanna on two feet.

Passage B
In attempting to locate the evolutionary origins of human rhythm, biomechanical reductionists often overlook the severe communicative necessities and intense survival pressures of early hominid societies. Shared rhythmic behavior cannot be adequately explained without recognizing its immense adaptive value in group survival. Long before the development of complex syntax, synchronized group vocalizations and percussive movements served as early forms of 'social glue.' These communal rhythmic rituals functioned to lower intragroup aggression, coordinate collective labor, and signal group strength to rival bands. Furthermore, if rhythmic capabilities were merely an incidental mechanical byproduct of locomotion, we would not expect to see the intense neurochemical rewards—such as the release of oxytocin and endorphins—that humans universally experience during synchronized group drumming or dancing. These dedicated, deeply embedded neurological reward pathways strongly indicate that rhythmic synchronization was directly and selectively favored for its socially cohesive properties. Natural selection actively shaped the human brain to reward synchronous rhythmic behavior because groups that danced and drummed together were substantially more likely to survive, cooperate, and reproduce than those that did not.

Statement: Based on the argument in Passage A, Author A would evaluate the "intense neurochemical rewards" cited by Author B as compelling evidence that rhythmic entrainment was selectively favored for its adaptive value in social bonding.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The statement is definitively false because Author A's entire argument rests on the premise that rhythmic entrainment is an evolutionary byproduct of bipedalism. Author A explicitly contrasts this with the view that it is a direct adaptation for social bonding. Therefore, Author A would reject Author B's interpretation that neurochemical rewards prove rhythm was selectively favored for social cohesion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify Author A's core thesis regarding the evolution of rhythmic entrainment.
Author A argues that rhythm is an evolutionary byproduct of bipedal locomotion, explicitly contrasting this with the view that it is a direct adaptation for social bonding.
Establishing Author A's baseline framework is necessary to predict their response to new evidence or opposing claims.
2
Analyze Author B's argument concerning 'intense neurochemical rewards'.
Author B uses the existence of these rewards to argue against the byproduct theory, positing that they indicate rhythm was selectively favored for social cohesion.
Understanding the function of the specific detail in Passage B clarifies what the inference is evaluating.
3
Evaluate the provided statement by applying Author A's framework to Author B's evidence.
The statement claims Author A would see the rewards as compelling evidence for the social adaptation theory. Because Author A explicitly rejects the social adaptation theory in favor of the byproduct theory, Author A would certainly not interpret the rewards as proof of social adaptation.
Cross-author inference requires strictly maintaining the targeted author's perspective without bleeding the second author's conclusions into it.

Anahtar Kavram

Cross-Author Perspective Evaluation and Viewpoint Consistency
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 169Soru →

Five years ago, a regional freight rail network replaced its legacy mechanical track switches across all primary corridors with solid-state electronic switches. Laboratory testing and field trials established that these electronic switches have a mean time between component malfunctions four times longer than that of the legacy mechanical switches. Nevertheless, railway logs indicate that the total number of freight train delays caused by track-switch malfunctions across these corridors was substantially higher during the five years following the replacement than during the five years preceding it.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy described above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: While a mechanical switch malfunction could be temporarily bypassed by train crews in minutes, an electronic switch fault automatically halts all corridor traffic until a specialized technician completes a full diagnostic reboot.

Cevap

The statement explaining that electronic switch faults trigger automated corridor-wide shutdowns affecting multiple trains while mechanical faults could be bypassed quickly on-site resolves the paradox.
The correct answer provides an operational asymmetry: mechanical switch failures were localized and bypassed in minutes (delaying at most one train), whereas an electronic failure triggers an automated corridor lockdown that cascades across multiple scheduled trains. Consequently, even with a substantially lower malfunction rate, the multiplier effect of each incident produces a higher total number of delayed trains.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the two competing facts in the stimulus.
Fact 1: Electronic switches suffer hardware malfunctions one-fourth as often as mechanical switches. Fact 2: Total freight train delays caused by switch malfunctions rose significantly after installing electronic switches.
Resolving a paradox requires clearly isolating the two seemingly incompatible premises.
2
Analyze the structural gap between the metrics.
The stimulus measures component malfunction frequency on one side and the total number of delayed trains on the other. A single malfunction incident could delay multiple trains if the recovery duration is extensive.
Differentiating between the frequency of an event and the severity or cascading impact of that event is the key logical mechanism.
3
Evaluate the answer choices for a mechanism that bridges both facts.
The finding that electronic switch failures cause protracted network-wide shutdowns affecting multiple successive trains reconciles fewer failure events with a greater aggregate count of train delays.
This allows both premises to remain entirely true without contradiction.

Anahtar Kavram

Reconciling incident frequency with cascading impact in paradox resolution
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 170Soru →

Three years ago, the city of Oakhaven enacted a steep annual penalty tax on commercial buildings that remain vacant for more than six months. The tax is financially ruinous, strongly motivating landlords to avoid paying it. Today, the total number of vacant commercial buildings in Oakhaven has dropped to nearly zero. Paradoxically, over the same three-year period, the total number of active businesses operating in Oakhaven has sharply declined, and the average cost to rent commercial space has skyrocketed.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Rather than paying the tax or accepting lower rents, many landlords demolished their vacant commercial buildings, as undeveloped land is exempt from the penalty.

Cevap

The statement explaining that landlords demolished their vacant commercial buildings to create tax-exempt undeveloped land.
The correct answer provides a single mechanism that perfectly aligns all the facts. By demolishing the buildings to create tax-exempt undeveloped land, the properties are no longer classified as 'vacant commercial buildings', explaining the drop to near-zero vacancy. At the same time, this massive destruction of commercial real estate creates a severe shortage of leasable space. This supply shock explains why rent prices skyrocketed for the remaining buildings, and the overall reduction in physical space explains why the total number of active businesses declined.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the opposing facts in the stimulus.
Fact 1: Vacant commercial buildings dropped to nearly zero. Fact 2: Active businesses sharply declined, and average rent skyrocketed.
Resolving a paradox requires a clear understanding of the seemingly contradictory premises.
2
Analyze the underlying tension between the facts.
Normally, a drop in vacant buildings implies more buildings are occupied by businesses, which should mean an increase in active businesses. Furthermore, more occupied buildings usually indicates a healthy supply, which shouldn't necessarily cause rents to skyrocket while business numbers decline.
Defining the expected logical relationship highlights exactly what the correct answer needs to explain.
3
Evaluate the options for a mechanism that reconciles all facts simultaneously.
The correct answer must explain how vacancy can drop while the supply of leasable space drops (causing high rents) and total businesses drop. The physical destruction of the buildings perfectly accounts for a drop in 'vacant buildings' without adding 'active businesses', while the resulting supply shock explains the rent increase.
The correct option must allow all premises to be true without directly denying any of them.

Anahtar Kavram

To resolve a paradox involving rates, numbers, or supply-demand economics, look for an unstated shift in the underlying baseline or total capacity.
Soru 171Soru →

Read the following two passages regarding the evaluation of visual art.

Passage A
In evaluating visual art, the strict formalist approach correctly insists that the aesthetic merit of a piece is intrinsic, residing entirely in its composition, color, line, and form. The artist’s biographical details, political affiliations, or the broader socio-economic conditions surrounding the work’s creation are categorically irrelevant to its aesthetic evaluation. When viewers allow themselves to be distracted by these extraneous historical narratives, they cease to engage with the artwork as art and instead treat it as a mere historical document. True artistic appreciation requires a deliberate suspension of historical curiosity. This allows the viewer to apprehend the structural harmony and emotional resonance generated purely by the artist's masterful manipulation of the medium itself. To introduce sociological considerations into the gallery space is to dilute the pure aesthetic experience with academic trivia. The greatness of a masterpiece lies not in what it tells us about the artist's era, but in its timeless ability to evoke a visceral response through its formal properties alone. Any suggestion that a painting is elevated by its political commentary misunderstands the fundamental purpose of art, which is to provide an autonomous realm of visual pleasure independent of worldly concerns. Consequently, the critic's sole duty is to analyze the internal relationships among the visual elements on the canvas, deliberately ignoring the cultural noise outside the frame.

Passage B
The persistent academic tendency to evaluate art through a strictly formalist lens severely impoverishes our understanding of artistic achievement. An artwork is never created in a cultural or political vacuum; it is inevitably a direct response to, or a product of, the specific historical pressures of its era. To isolate a painting's structural elements from the historical realities it reflects, reinforces, or challenges is to strip the work of its vital substance. For instance, the jagged, chaotic lines and dissonant color palettes of early twentieth-century Expressionist paintings cannot be fully or accurately comprehended merely as aesthetic choices or formal experiments. Rather, they are deliberate articulations of the profound alienation and anxiety pervading a society on the brink of global conflict. Ignoring this crucial context and focusing solely on brushstrokes or geometry reduces a profound cultural critique to a superficial decorative exercise. The true meaning of an artwork is always tethered to the world that produced it. By artificially severing the artwork from its societal origins, the formalist not only misinterprets the artist's fundamental intentions but also renders the art itself mute on the very issues that gave it life. Therefore, any critical framework that actively suppresses historical awareness in the name of "pure" appreciation is fundamentally flawed, as it willfully blinds the viewer to the most urgent and substantive communicative layers of the art.

Based on the passages, Author A would be most likely to respond to Author B's assertion that focusing solely on a painting's structural elements "reduces a profound cultural critique to a superficial decorative exercise" (Passage B) in which one of the following ways?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: By asserting that treating an artwork primarily as a vehicle for cultural critique distracts the viewer from its true aesthetic value, and that ignoring historical context is necessary to engage with the piece as art.

Cevap

Author A would respond by asserting that treating an artwork primarily as a vehicle for cultural critique distracts the viewer from its true aesthetic value, and that ignoring historical context is necessary to engage with the piece as art.
Author A explicitly argues that 'extraneous historical narratives' distract viewers, causing them to treat art as a 'mere historical document.' Furthermore, Author A insists that true artistic appreciation requires a 'deliberate suspension of historical curiosity.' Therefore, Author A would view the 'superficial decorative exercise' mentioned by Author B not as a negative reduction, but as the essential, pure aesthetic experience that results from correctly ignoring irrelevant cultural and political noise.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Author B's assertion in context.
Author B believes that focusing purely on structural elements (geometry) ignores the crucial context of art, reducing meaningful cultural critiques to mere superficial decoration.
Understanding the exact nature of Author B's criticism is required before predicting how Author A would respond.
2
Identify Author A's core thesis regarding historical context and formal evaluation.
Author A argues that historical narratives and political affiliations are 'categorically irrelevant' and that true appreciation requires a 'deliberate suspension of historical curiosity.'
Author A's foundational principles provide the framework for their theoretical response to any criticism.
3
Synthesize Author A's principles with Author B's specific claim to formulate Author A's likely response.
Author A would argue that what Author B values as a 'profound cultural critique' actually distracts viewers, causing them to treat the art as a 'mere historical document.' Therefore, ignoring this critique is not a flaw, but a necessity for true aesthetic appreciation.
This directly answers the question by projecting one author's explicitly stated logic onto the other author's specific contention.

Anahtar Kavram

Cross-Author Inference in Comparative Reading

Alternatif Yöntem

Instead of predicting Author A's response first, you can evaluate the choices by process of elimination: eliminate any choice that suggests Author A values historical context (rules out the synthesis option and the misattribution option), eliminate extreme distortions of Author A's view (rules out the option claiming artists have no politics), leaving only the correct answer.
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Soru 172Soru →

Clara: High schools should require all students to complete a personal finance course before graduating, as understanding budgeting and credit is essential for adult independence.

David: High schools should not mandate personal finance courses; students already carry too many graduation requirements, and basic financial literacy is more appropriately taught by parents at home.

Statement: Clara and David disagree over whether a personal finance course should be a mandatory graduation requirement in high schools.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement correctly describes an explicit point of disagreement between the speakers. Clara advocates for mandating personal finance as a graduation requirement, while David directly opposes making the course mandatory. Because both speakers commit to clear, opposite viewpoints on the proposition, the statement is true.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the first speaker's position
Clara explicitly states that high schools should require all students to take a personal finance course prior to graduation.
To identify Clara's commitment regarding the mandatory status of the course.
2
Analyze the second speaker's position
David explicitly states that high schools should not mandate personal finance courses for graduation.
To identify David's commitment regarding the mandatory status of the course.
3
Compare both positions against the given statement
Clara answers 'yes' to mandating the course for graduation, while David answers 'no'. Thus, the statement accurately identifies a point of disagreement.
A point of disagreement requires both parties to take opposing stances on the exact same proposition.

Anahtar Kavram

Point of Disagreement Identification
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 173Soru →

Astrophysicist: Any star cluster that formed in an environment with high stellar density underwent rapid gravitational relaxation during its infancy. Star clusters that undergo rapid gravitational relaxation inevitably expel all of their intermediate-mass black holes through stellar dynamical interactions. The Pyxis cluster currently contains several intermediate-mass black holes. Therefore, the Pyxis cluster must have originated in a region with abundant molecular gas clouds.

The astrophysicist's conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Any star cluster that did not originate in a region with abundant molecular gas clouds formed in an environment with high stellar density.

Cevap

The assumption that any star cluster that did not originate in a region with abundant molecular gas clouds formed in an environment with high stellar density.
The credited response establishes the conditional rule that not originating in abundant molecular gas clouds implies forming in high stellar density (¬M→H\neg M \rightarrow H). The contrapositive of this statement is that not forming in high stellar density guarantees originating in abundant molecular gas clouds (¬H→M\neg H \rightarrow M). Because the premises prove that the Pyxis cluster did not form in high stellar density (¬H\neg H), this rule rigorously guarantees that Pyxis must have originated in a region with abundant molecular gas clouds.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze and diagram the formal conditional relationships in the premises.
Premise 1: Formed in high stellar density →\rightarrow Rapid gravitational relaxation (H→RH \rightarrow R). Premise 2: Rapid gravitational relaxation →\rightarrow Expel all intermediate-mass black holes (R→No BR \rightarrow \text{No } B). Combining these yields H→R→No BH \rightarrow R \rightarrow \text{No } B, with the contrapositive being: Contains intermediate-mass black holes →\rightarrow Did not undergo rapid gravitational relaxation →\rightarrow Did not form in high stellar density (B→¬R→¬HB \rightarrow \neg R \rightarrow \neg H).
Deconstructing the conditional chain isolates what is already proven from what remains unproven.
2
Evaluate the specific evidence given about the subject and identify the inferential gap.
The Pyxis cluster contains intermediate-mass black holes (BPyxisB_{\text{Pyxis}}), which deductively proves that Pyxis did not form in high stellar density (¬HPyxis\neg H_{\text{Pyxis}}). The conclusion claims that Pyxis originated in a region with abundant molecular gas clouds (MPyxisM_{\text{Pyxis}}). The deductive gap is between ¬HPyxis\neg H_{\text{Pyxis}} and MPyxisM_{\text{Pyxis}}.
A sufficient assumption must provide a conditional rule where the proven fact (¬H\neg H) guarantees the final conclusion (MM).
3
Identify the missing sufficient bridge condition.
We need the rule ¬H→M\neg H \rightarrow M, which is logically equivalent to its contrapositive ¬M→H\neg M \rightarrow H ('If a star cluster did not originate in abundant molecular gas clouds, it formed in high stellar density').
Adding ¬H→M\neg H \rightarrow M to the premise deduction ¬HPyxis\neg H_{\text{Pyxis}} 100% logically forces the conclusion MPyxisM_{\text{Pyxis}}.

Anahtar Kavram

Sufficient Assumption / Conditional Contrapositive Chain
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 174Soru →

Archivist: Many digital preservationists claim that converting historical paper manuscripts into high-resolution digital scans guarantees the indefinite preservation of the intellectual content in those manuscripts. However, digital storage media degrade rapidly and require periodic format migration across changing hardware architectures. Because most archival institutions lack the continuous funding required for perpetual data refreshing and system upgrades, many digitized collections will inevitably become unreadable within a few decades. Therefore, digital scanning cannot be considered a reliable guarantee of the long-term preservation of archival content.

Which of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the archivist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Digital scanning does not provide a dependable guarantee that archival content will be preserved over the long term.

Cevap

Digital scanning does not provide a dependable guarantee that archival content will be preserved over the long term.
The author provides factual premises about media degradation and financial realities to establish that digitized collections will become unreadable, which directly supports the ultimate claim introduced by the conclusion indicator 'Therefore': digital scanning cannot be considered a reliable guarantee of long-term archival preservation.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the rhetorical structure of the stimulus to separate context, premises, intermediate conclusions, and the final deduction.
The archivist introduces a common belief (digital scanning ensures indefinite preservation), introduces factual premises regarding digital degradation and institutional financial limitations, deduces a subsidiary point (collections will become unreadable), and finishes with the main point introduced by 'Therefore'.
Accurate argument deconstruction is essential to avoid mistaking subsidiary claims for the ultimate conclusion.
2
Apply the 'Why?' test between the candidate conclusion statements to verify direction of support.
Digital scanning is not a reliable guarantee (Main Conclusion) BECAUSE collections will become unreadable without perpetual funding (Intermediate Conclusion). The relationship does not work in reverse.
The main conclusion is supported by other statements in the stimulus and does not itself serve to support any further claim.
3
Match the identified main conclusion to the corresponding answer choice.
The choice stating that digital scanning does not provide a dependable guarantee of long-term preservation matches the author's final claim precisely.
The correct response must be an accurate, unembellished paraphrase of the ultimate conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing the Main Conclusion from Intermediate Conclusions and Premises
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 175Soru →

Read the following two passages regarding the interpretation of Paleolithic cave art.

Passage A
Recent structural analyses of Paleolithic cave art have fundamentally challenged traditional interpretations of the geometric signs frequently found adjacent to animal figures. Long dismissed as mere decorative doodles or abstract byproducts of artistic experimentation, these signs—such as penniforms, tectiforms, and scalariforms—exhibit distinct regional patterning and sequential ordering. This structured repetition strongly suggests that these symbols constituted an early form of proto-writing, a deliberate semiotic system developed to communicate complex concepts across generations. Rather than being spontaneous or biologically determined, the placement and pairing of these signs indicate a culturally acquired, syntactical code intended to convey specific abstract information within Ice Age communities.

Passage B
The neuropsychological model provides the most compelling explanation for the geometric motifs pervasive in Upper Paleolithic rock art. During altered states of consciousness, which were central to the shamanic practices of these hunter-gatherer societies, individuals universally experience specific geometric visual hallucinations, known as entoptic phenomena. The striking consistency of these forms—such as grids, zigzags, and nested curves—across vastly separated continents and epochs is not indicative of a shared symbolic language or a developed writing system. Instead, it reflects the shared neurological architecture of the human brain. The artists were meticulously documenting their trance visions, translating the direct biological phenomena of the nervous system onto the cave walls, rather than deploying a deliberate cultural cipher.

Based on the texts provided, which of the following represents a point of disagreement between the authors of Passage A and Passage B regarding the geometric signs in Paleolithic rock art?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Whether they were created primarily to function as a deliberate system of communication.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that the authors disagree over whether the signs were created primarily to function as a deliberate system of communication.
The correct answer accurately isolates the core conflict between the two texts. The author of Passage A argues that the geometric signs 'constituted an early form of proto-writing, a deliberate semiotic system developed to communicate complex concepts.' In direct contrast, the author of Passage B states that the signs are 'not indicative of a shared symbolic language or a developed writing system,' arguing instead that they were spontaneous documentations of biological 'trance visions.' Thus, the authors fundamentally disagree on whether the primary purpose of the signs was deliberate communication.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Passage A to determine its core argument regarding the origin and function of the geometric signs.
Passage A argues that the signs constituted a 'deliberate semiotic system' and a 'syntactical code' developed specifically to communicate complex abstract ideas.
Understanding the primary stance of the first author is required to find a point of conflict.
2
Analyze Passage B to determine its core argument on the same subject.
Passage B argues that the signs reflect 'entoptic phenomena' (biological hallucinations) and explicitly states they are 'not indicative of a shared symbolic language or a developed writing system.'
Understanding the primary stance of the second author is necessary to compare it against the first.
3
Compare the two synthesized viewpoints to identify a proposition that one author clearly affirms and the other clearly rejects.
Passage A affirms that the signs are a deliberate communication code. Passage B explicitly rejects the idea that they are a symbolic language or cipher.
A true point of disagreement requires opposing stances on the exact same issue.
4
Evaluate the options against this identified point of contention.
The option regarding whether the signs were created as a deliberate system of communication perfectly captures the conflict between Passage A's 'semiotic system' theory and Passage B's 'biological phenomena' theory.
This confirms the correct answer choice aligns with the textual evidence from both passages.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying genuine points of contention requires finding a specific claim that one author explicitly or implicitly endorses while the other explicitly or implicitly rejects, avoiding false disagreements where one author remains silent.
Soru 176Soru →

City council member: Building a new municipal light rail line will significantly reduce downtown traffic congestion. Past transportation studies demonstrate that dedicated rail corridors attract commuters away from single-occupancy vehicles. Therefore, the city council should approve funding for the light rail project.

Which of the following best describes the role played in the argument by the claim that building a new municipal light rail line will significantly reduce downtown traffic congestion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: It is an intermediate conclusion drawn to support the argument's ultimate recommendation.

Cevap

The statement functions as an intermediate conclusion supported by evidence about commuter behavior and used to justify the final policy recommendation.
The correct description identifies the statement as an intermediate conclusion. The council member supports the statement using data from past transportation studies, and then uses that statement as the primary justification for the final recommendation that the council should approve project funding.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion and the overall purpose of the argument.
The final sentence contains the conclusion indicator 'Therefore' and states the main recommendation: 'the city council should approve funding for the light rail project.'
Determining the main conclusion provides the reference point for assessing how other statements relate structurally to the final claim.
2
Examine the relationship between the target claim and the supporting evidence.
The claim that the rail line will reduce congestion is directly supported by the premise that dedicated rail corridors attract commuters away from single-occupancy vehicles.
Because the targeted statement receives logical support from evidence within the stimulus, it functions as a conclusion.
3
Determine whether the target claim also provides support to another claim.
The reduction in traffic congestion serves as the primary rationale for why the council ought to approve funding.
A claim that is both supported by premises and used to support the final conclusion is, by definition, an intermediate (subsidiary) conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing intermediate (subsidiary) conclusions from main conclusions and basic premises in multi-step arguments.
Soru 177Soru →

Assess the four argumentative excerpts below, each of which contains a distinct logical flaw. Which abstract description most accurately identifies the primary reasoning vulnerability in each argument? Match each flawed excerpt with its corresponding flaw description.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Chief Medical Administrator: Every individual department within our regional healthcare network successfully operated under its allocated budget this fiscal year. Therefore, the regional healthcare network as an aggregate organization cannot have incurred any net budgetary deficit this year.
Marine Biologist: Humpback whales produce low-frequency feeding vocalizations only when a dense aggregation of prey fish is present within their acoustic range. Hydrophone arrays have confirmed that a dense aggregation of prey fish is currently present within the pod's acoustic range; consequently, the pod will definitely produce low-frequency feeding vocalizations.
Forensic Auditor: The opposing consultant argues that the electronic transaction logs were deliberately altered via an automated script. However, that consultant has received honoraria from financial competitors of the transaction processor. We must therefore conclude that the transaction logs were authentic.
Urban Microclimate Specialist: To mitigate extreme ambient temperatures in the central commercial district, the municipal board must either resurface all thoroughfares with high-albedo coatings or mandate vegetative green roofs across all commercial properties. Because commercial property groups have blocked the green roof mandate, the board must resurface all thoroughfares with high-albedo coatings.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The argument regarding the regional healthcare network matches the description of inferring a whole possesses a characteristic of its parts; the humpback whale argument matches the description of treating a necessary condition as sufficient; the forensic audit argument matches the description of rejecting an assertion by targeting personal incentives; and the urban microclimate argument matches the description of assuming only two courses of action exist.
Each argument contains a distinct, classic reasoning error that aligns with exactly one abstract flaw description: the healthcare excerpt commits a part-to-whole error (composition); the whale vocalization excerpt commits a necessary/sufficient conditional error; the audit excerpt commits an ad hominem source dismissal; and the urban microclimate excerpt commits a false dilemma.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural gap in the healthcare administration excerpt.
The premise attributes budgetary compliance to each distinct department (parts), while the conclusion attributes freedom from deficit to the combined network (whole).
This isolates the classical error of composition (part-to-whole inference).
2
Analyze the conditional logic in the marine biology excerpt.
The indicator 'only when' sets prey presence as a necessary condition (Vocalizations -> Prey). The premise affirms prey presence and improperly infers that vocalizations must occur.
This isolates the error of mistaking a necessary condition for a sufficient condition.
3
Analyze the rebuttal strategy in the forensic auditing excerpt.
The author attacks the consultant's background (honoraria from competitors) to deduce that the consultant's factual claim is false and the logs are authentic.
This isolates a source/ad hominem flaw.
4
Analyze the policy framework in the urban microclimate excerpt.
The author constructs an 'either/or' premise without establishing exhaustive exclusivity, concluding that eliminating one policy forces the adoption of the other.
This isolates a false dilemma/false dichotomy flaw.

Anahtar Kavram

Identification and Classification of Reasoning Vulnerabilities
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 178Soru →

Archaeologist: A recently translated archive of clay tablets from the ancient city of Kesh details all raw metal shipments received over a decade. The proportion of raw tin to copper recorded in these logs is significantly lower than the high proportion of tin found in the ornate bronze artifacts excavated from the city's contemporaneous elite tombs. This discrepancy indicates that the bronze items buried with the elite were likely imported as finished luxury goods rather than locally smelted from Kesh's raw material shipments.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the archaeologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Raw tin was extraordinarily expensive and was exclusively reserved by Kesh artisans for smelting the specialized items destined for the elite class, whereas copper was used abundantly for common tools.

Cevap

The statement regarding tin being exclusively reserved for elite items while copper was used broadly for common tools.
The argument relies on a flawed statistical assumption: that the composition of a specific subset of goods (elite tomb artifacts) must perfectly match the aggregate composition of all raw materials entering the city. The correct answer destroys this assumption by showing that distribution was heavily skewed. If artisans used the abundant copper for everyday tools but reserved the rare, expensive tin almost entirely for elite items, then local artisans could easily produce high-tin bronze for the elite. This perfectly bridges the gap between the low-tin trade records and the high-tin artifacts, proving that local smelting is a viable explanation and weakening the conclusion that the items had to be imported.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The bronze items buried with the elite were imported as finished goods rather than locally smelted.
This is the author's main claim based on the discrepancy presented in the premises.
2
Identify the premises supporting the conclusion.
The proportion of tin to copper in raw shipments (overall imports) is significantly lower than the proportion of tin found in the elite bronze artifacts.
The author uses this mismatch in proportions as the sole evidence for the conclusion.
3
Identify the unstated assumption linking the premise to the conclusion.
The argument assumes that any bronze smelted locally in Kesh would necessarily reflect the aggregate tin-to-copper ratio of the city's total raw metal shipments.
For the premise to prove the conclusion, the overall average of raw materials must dictate the composition of all individual local products.
4
Find the option that attacks this assumption.
The correct answer shows that the aggregate ratio does not dictate the specific ratio of elite goods, because tin was disproportionately concentrated into items made for the elite.
If local artisans concentrated the limited tin into a few elite items, the elite items would have a high tin ratio despite the city's overall low tin imports, destroying the author's logic.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Flaws in Generalization / Part-to-Whole Fallacy
Soru 179Soru →

Each of the following arguments contains an inferential gap between its premises and its conclusion. Match each incomplete argument on the left with the assumption on the right that, if added as an additional premise, is logically sufficient to make the argument's conclusion follow with absolute deductive certainty.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Argument 1: Any neural architecture that operates strictly via predictive coding generates sensory predictions prior to receiving peripheral input. Architecture Gamma operates strictly via predictive coding. Therefore, Architecture Gamma cannot produce unmediated representations of external reality.
Argument 2: Any jurisdiction that eliminates statutory damages for trade secret misappropriation experiences a decrease in proprietary patent filings. Jurisdiction Delta has not experienced a decrease in proprietary patent filings. Hence, Jurisdiction Delta has maintained high levels of domestic research and development expenditure.
Argument 3: No oceanic ecosystem subject to severe ocean acidification maintains baseline calcification rates in hermatypic corals. The Pelican Reef ecosystem has maintained baseline calcification rates in hermatypic corals. Consequently, the Pelican Reef ecosystem was not exposed to anthropogenic atmospheric carbon spikes.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Argument 1 matches with the premise that systems generating sensory predictions prior to peripheral input cannot produce unmediated representations; Argument 2 matches with the premise that jurisdictions not eliminating statutory damages maintain high domestic R&D expenditure; Argument 3 matches with the premise that ecosystems exposed to anthropogenic carbon spikes are subject to severe ocean acidification.
Each match correctly identifies the universal conditional statement that closes the deductive gap in the argument. The predictive coding argument requires a bridge from prior prediction generation to representational mediation. The patent filing argument requires a bridge from non-elimination of statutory damages to sustained research and development expenditure. The coral reef argument requires a conditional statement whose contrapositive connects the lack of severe ocean acidification to the absence of carbon spike exposure.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the intermediate deductive facts established by the premises of each argument.
Argument 1 yields 'Architecture Gamma generates predictions prior to input'; Argument 2 yields via modus tollens 'Jurisdiction Delta has not eliminated statutory damages'; Argument 3 yields via modus tollens 'Pelican Reef is not subject to severe ocean acidification'.
Identifying the precise intermediate conclusions isolates the remaining deductive gap between the premises and the stated conclusion.
2
Formulate the conditional rule required to bridge each intermediate fact to its target conclusion.
For Argument 1, a rule linking 'generates predictions prior to input' to 'cannot produce unmediated representations' is required. For Argument 2, a rule linking '~eliminates statutory damages' to 'maintains high R&D' is required. For Argument 3, a conditional statement whose contrapositive links '~severe ocean acidification' to '~exposed to carbon spikes' is required.
A sufficient assumption must form an unbroken formal conditional chain that guarantees the conclusion without logical defect.
3
Match each argument with its corresponding universal conditional bridge.
Argument 1 pairs with the unmediated representation rule; Argument 2 pairs with the statutory damages to R&D rule; Argument 3 pairs with the carbon spikes to acidification rule.
Each selected assumption supplies 100% deductive sufficiency.

Anahtar Kavram

Sufficient Assumption in Formal Conditional Logic
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Soru 180Soru →

Cognitive Scientist: Proponents of the cognitive reserve hypothesis contend that engaging in complex mental activities in late adulthood directly prevents neurodegeneration. To support this, they cite studies showing that elderly individuals who regularly solve complex puzzles or learn foreign languages exhibit significantly lower rates of cortical atrophy. However, this argument overlooks an alternative explanation: individuals with higher innate neural plasticity are both naturally drawn to intellectually demanding tasks and inherently resistant to age-related tissue degradation. Thus, the observed correlation does not establish that the mental activities themselves confer protection against neurodegeneration.

Which of the following most accurately describes the method of reasoning employed by the cognitive scientist?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Undermining a causal inference by proposing a common underlying factor that accounts for both the purported cause and the observed effect

Cevap

The cognitive scientist's argument proceeds by undermining a causal inference by proposing a common underlying factor that accounts for both the purported cause and the observed effect.
The correct answer accurately characterizes the author's logical strategy: the proponents observe a correlation between mental activity (purported cause) and reduced atrophy (observed effect) and conclude that the former causes the latter. The author counters by introducing a third variable—innate neural plasticity—that causes both phenomena, thereby demonstrating that the observed correlation does not prove the proponents' causal claim.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the opponent's argument and the author's main conclusion.
Proponents infer a causal link (mental activities prevent neurodegeneration) from an observed correlation (puzzle-solving correlates with lower atrophy). The author concludes that this correlation does not prove the causal link.
Identifying the conclusion and opposing position is the first step in analyzing the method of reasoning.
2
Evaluate the evidence and mechanism introduced by the author.
The author introduces a third factor—innate neural plasticity—which simultaneously explains why certain individuals engage in mental tasks and why those same individuals experience less atrophy.
This establishes the logical function of the author's counter-premise as an alternative causal explanation (common cause / confounder).
3
Match the argument's technique to the abstract structural description.
The technique is a classic refutation of a causal claim by demonstrating that a common underlying cause can account for both the supposed cause and the effect.
The correct description must accurately reflect this causal critique without adding unstated logical fallacies or extreme claims.

Anahtar Kavram

Method of Reasoning: Causal Refutation via Common Underlying Cause
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
ÖncekiSayfa 9 / 198Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — LSAT | Examkin