Tüm alıştırma soruları

424 soru

Soru 1Soru →

Public Health Official: The new occupational safety regulations implemented at the Apex Manufacturing plant have clearly been successful in making the facility a safer place to work. Despite the plant increasing its total manufacturing output by 30 percent this year, the annual number of reported workplace injuries has remained exactly the same as last year before the regulations took effect.

Statement: The public health official's argument depends on the assumption that the plant did not achieve its increase in output by heavily automating its processes and significantly reducing the size of its human workforce.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The proposed statement identifies a necessary 'defender' assumption. The argument relies on a flat absolute number (total injuries) to support a claim about a rate (workplace safety). For 'same total injuries' to mean 'safer', the underlying population of workers must not have significantly decreased. If the plant achieved its output by drastically cutting its human workforce through automation, then the same number of injuries occurred among far fewer workers, meaning the injury rate per worker skyrocketed. Because the argument completely collapses if we assume a severe workforce reduction occurred, the argument must implicitly assume that such a reduction did not occur.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and premises of the public health official's argument.
Conclusion: The new safety regulations made the facility a safer place to work. Premises: Manufacturing output increased by 30%, but the total number of reported injuries remained exactly the same.
Deconstructing the argument is necessary to expose the logical gap between the evidence and the claim.
2
Analyze the logical gap between the premises and the conclusion.
The argument uses an absolute number (total injuries) to make a claim about safety (a rate of risk per individual worker). For the conclusion to hold, the author must assume the total number of workers exposed to risk did not significantly decrease.
If the number of workers decreased while total injuries stayed the same, the risk per worker actually increased.
3
Apply the Negation Test to the proposed assumption.
Negated statement: The plant DID achieve its increase in output by heavily automating its processes and significantly reducing the size of its human workforce.
The Negation Test is the definitive LSAT method for proving whether an assumption is logically necessary.
4
Evaluate the impact of the negated statement on the argument.
If the plant significantly reduced its workforce, the constant number of total injuries means the injury rate per remaining worker increased drastically. This destroys the conclusion that the facility is a safer place to work.
Because negating the statement invalidates the argument's conclusion, the statement must be a necessary assumption.

Anahtar Kavram

Defender Assumptions and the Numbers vs. Rates Flaw
Soru 2Soru →

Historian: The collapse of the Bronze Age civilization of Alashiya was long attributed to a massive earthquake. However, sediment core analyses reveal a multi-decade drought immediately preceding the collapse. Furthermore, contemporaneous administrative tablets show an abrupt shift from recording luxury trade to issuing frantic requests for grain. Therefore, the collapse was fundamentally driven by climatological resource scarcity rather than sudden seismic activity.

Evaluate the following statement as true or false regarding the argument above:
The statement 'The abrupt shift in the administrative tablets to requests for grain was not primarily a response to agricultural devastation wrought by a sudden earthquake' functions as a necessary assumption for the historian's conclusion.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True. The statement functions as a necessary assumption because its logical negation directly destroys the historian's conclusion.
The statement correctly identifies a required condition for the historian's argument. Without this assumption, the evidence (grain requests) could be hijacked to support the opposing theory (the earthquake), collapsing the entire causal argument.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premises and the main conclusion of the historian's argument.
Premises: A drought preceded the collapse, and tablets show frantic requests for grain. Conclusion: The collapse was fundamentally driven by climatological resource scarcity rather than a sudden earthquake.
To evaluate an assumption, one must first isolate exactly what the author is trying to prove and the specific evidence used to prove it.
2
Analyze the logical gap connecting the evidence to the conclusion.
The author assumes that the grain requests (resource scarcity) point to the drought. The gap is the assumption that the competing theory (the earthquake) did not cause the grain requests.
Recognizing vulnerabilities in causal arguments is essential for identifying 'Defender' assumptions that rule out alternate explanations.
3
Apply the Negation Technique to the provided statement.
The logical negation is: 'The abrupt shift in the tablets to requests for grain WAS primarily a response to agricultural devastation wrought by a sudden earthquake.'
The Negation Technique is the definitive test for a necessary assumption. If the negated statement destroys the argument, the original statement is necessary.
4
Evaluate the impact of the negated statement on the argument.
If the grain requests were indeed caused by the earthquake, then the earthquake (not the climate) fundamentally drove the collapse. The conclusion is destroyed.
Since the negated version collapses the argument, the original statement is strictly required for the argument to hold.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Necessary Assumptions (Defender Model)
Soru 3Soru →

Read the following passage regarding architectural history:

The architectural movement known as Brutalism, which flourished from the 1950s to the mid-1970s, is characterized by several distinct elements. Most notably, Brutalist buildings feature exposed, unpainted concrete surfaces that proudly display the texture of the wooden forms used during construction. Additionally, these structures typically exhibit massive, monolithic shapes and a highly rigid geometric style. Functionally, the buildings are deliberately designed to expose their structural materials and internal mechanical systems, rather than concealing them.

Statement: Based on the passage, the author explicitly lists exposed concrete surfaces, monolithic shapes, and visible mechanical systems as characteristics of Brutalism, but does NOT mention intricate ornamental detailing as a feature of this style.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True. The statement accurately identifies the characteristics present in the text and correctly notes the exclusion of intricate ornamental detailing.
The passage explicitly provides a list of Brutalist characteristics: exposed concrete, monolithic shapes, and visible mechanical systems. It completely omits any mention of intricate ornamental detailing, making the statement's claim about what is and is NOT mentioned completely accurate.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the passage to identify the explicitly stated characteristics of Brutalist architecture.
The passage lists: exposed concrete surfaces, monolithic shapes, rigid geometric style, and exposed structural/mechanical systems.
To verify the first half of the statement regarding what the author explicitly lists.
2
Check the passage for any mention of 'intricate ornamental detailing'.
The passage does not mention intricate ornamental detailing.
To verify the 'NOT' (exclusion) portion of the statement.
3
Evaluate the complete statement based on the findings from the passage.
The statement correctly identifies the included elements and correctly identifies the excluded element.
To determine the final True or False value.

Anahtar Kavram

Exclusion Questions (EXCEPT/LEAST/NOT)
Soru 4Soru →

Scenario: A geothermal power facility instituted a flash-crystallization process designed to prevent amorphous silica scaling in its deep reinjection wells by precipitating dissolved silica into microscopic, suspended particles before the spent geothermal brine enters the injection boreholes. Pipeline flow tests verified that these suspended micro-particles do not adhere to interior pipe surfaces. Nevertheless, during the two years following the deployment of this process, the rate of severe flow blockages caused by mineral accumulation in the facility's reinjection wells increased markedly.

Statement: The finding that the suspended silica micro-particles rapidly aggregate with ambient clay platelets upon entering the subterranean rock formation to form dense mineral plugs in rock fissures, if true, helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy described in the scenario.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement is true because it supplies an unexamined causal bridge that allows both premises to coexist: the flash-crystallized silica particles remain non-adherent within the metal piping, yet their physical presence triggers clogging when they interface with ambient clay in the rock formation fissures.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the two conflicting facts presented in the stimulus
Fact 1: Flash-crystallization converts silica into suspended micro-particles that do not adhere to pipe walls. Fact 2: Mineral-induced flow blockages in the reinjection wells increased significantly after adopting the process.
A resolve-the-paradox evaluation requires identifying the exact tension between an expected benefit and an observed contrary outcome.
2
Assess the explanatory mechanism introduced in the statement
The auxiliary statement provides a mechanism where non-adhering particles chemically or physically interact with ambient clay platelets in the surrounding rock fissures to form mechanical clogs.
To resolve the paradox, the new information must allow both stated facts to remain true while explaining the causal link leading to the unexpected result.
3
Determine whether the statement successfully bridges the discrepancy
Because it explains how non-pipe-adherent particles cause subterranean well blockages without denying the pipeline test findings, the statement successfully resolves the paradox.
Mastery of paradox resolution requires confirming that the proposed fact harmonizes the apparent contradiction.

Anahtar Kavram

Resolving an apparent contradiction by identifying an unexamined downstream mechanism outside the scope of initial testing
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 5Soru →

Read the following two passages regarding moral psychology.

Passage A
The long-held consensus in moral philosophy has been that ethical judgments are fundamentally products of rational deliberation. When a person encounters a moral dilemma, they evaluate the circumstances against universal principles, employing logic to determine the appropriate course of action. It is certainly true that strong feelings often accompany moral judgments—one might feel disgust at a cruel act or satisfaction upon witnessing justice served. However, these affective responses are consequences, rather than causes, of the cognitive evaluation. To claim otherwise is to reduce the complex architecture of human morality to mere biological reflexes, stripping moral decisions of their normative weight.

Passage B
Recent advancements in cognitive science have forced a radical reassessment of how moral judgments are formed. The traditional view—that humans operate as detached rational agents deducing ethical truths—is largely a fiction. Empirical evidence demonstrates that moral decisions are overwhelmingly driven by immediate, intuitive emotional responses. When faced with a moral violation, the feeling of condemnation arises instantaneously, before any conscious reasoning can occur. What we traditionally call 'moral reasoning' is typically just a post-hoc rationalization, a cognitive mechanism designed to justify an emotional reaction that has already dictated the judgment. Reason is not the master of our moral lives, but the servant of our moral sentiments.

Statement: Based on the passages, the authors would disagree over whether individuals actually experience strong emotional reactions when confronting moral dilemmas.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The statement is false because the authors do not disagree on this point; they are in complete agreement that strong emotions accompany moral dilemmas. Passage A notes that 'strong feelings often accompany moral judgments,' and Passage B argues that moral decisions are 'driven by immediate, intuitive emotional responses.' Their actual disagreement lies in whether reasoning precedes emotion or emotion precedes reasoning.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Passage A to determine its stance on whether people experience strong emotions during moral dilemmas.
Passage A explicitly states, 'It is certainly true that strong feelings often accompany moral judgments.'
To evaluate a potential point of disagreement, we must first establish the exact position of the first author on the specific issue.
2
Analyze Passage B to determine its stance on the same issue.
Passage B states that moral decisions are 'driven by immediate, intuitive emotional responses' and that a 'feeling of condemnation arises instantaneously.'
We must establish the second author's position to compare it with the first.
3
Compare the two stances to determine if there is a mutual disagreement regarding the statement.
Both authors agree that strong emotional reactions occur. Their actual disagreement is about whether these emotions cause the moral judgment (Passage B) or are a consequence of rational moral judgment (Passage A).
A valid point of disagreement requires one author to affirm a proposition that the other actively denies.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying False Disagreements (Shared Premises)
Soru 6Soru →

Scenario: A commercial greenhouse facility replaced all of its traditional high-pressure sodium (HPS) grow lights with energy-efficient LED fixtures that draw 40 percent less electrical power while delivering identical light output for plant growth. Nevertheless, during the subsequent winter operating season, the facility's total electricity consumption increased significantly compared to previous winters.

Statement: The factual proposition that LED fixtures emit substantially less radiant heat than HPS fixtures, forcing the facility to run auxiliary electric space heaters continuously to maintain the requisite ambient growing temperatures, successfully resolves the apparent discrepancy in the facility's winter electricity consumption.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The evaluated statement accurately identifies a compensatory mechanism that bridges both sides of the paradox: the reduction in waste heat from efficient LED fixtures created a new heating deficit that was met by electric heating units, resulting in a net increase in total electrical consumption.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the two seemingly conflicting premises presented in the scenario.
Premise 1 establishes that more efficient lighting fixtures drawing 40 percent less electricity were installed. Premise 2 establishes that total winter electricity consumption rose significantly.
Resolving a paradox requires isolating the tension between the expected decrease in power draw and the observed increase in total consumption.
2
Analyze the causal mechanism introduced in the auxiliary statement.
The auxiliary statement explains that the new LED fixtures emit far less byproduct heat, which necessitated running supplemental electric heaters.
A valid resolution must supply an external factor that explains how both established premises can be true simultaneously without rejecting either premise.
3
Evaluate whether the auxiliary statement successfully reconciles the discrepancy.
The additional electrical load required to run electric heaters offsets and exceeds the energy saved on lighting, fully explaining the net rise in total electricity usage.
Because the statement provides a complete, logically sound reconciliation of the two facts, the proposition is True.

Anahtar Kavram

Compensatory causal mechanisms in paradox resolution

Alternatif Yöntem

Frame the scenario as an energy balance equation: Total Electricity=Lighting Load+Heating Load\text{Total Electricity} = \text{Lighting Load} + \text{Heating Load}. When Lighting Load\text{Lighting Load} decreases by ΔL\Delta L but Heating Load\text{Heating Load} increases by ΔH\Delta H (where ΔH>ΔL\Delta H > \Delta L), Total Electricity\text{Total Electricity} increases, fully reconciling the observations.
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 7Soru →

Marine Biologist: Benthic gastropods (*Alviniconcha*) residing near deep-sea hydrothermal vents in sulfide-rich plumes harbor chemosynthetic endosymbionts in their gill tissues and possess notably thicker shells than conspecifics inhabiting iron-dominated plumes, which consistently lack these endosymbionts. Because thicker shells confer greater structural defense against hydrostatic pressure, the biologist concludes that metabolic activity of the endosymbionts directly promotes shell thickening by concentrating dissolved calcium ions.

Statement: The finding that *Alviniconcha* specimens transferred from iron-dominated plumes to sulfide-rich plumes develop thicker shells only when their gill tissues become successfully colonized by chemosynthetic bacteria strengthens the marine biologist's argument.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement is true because the empirical finding isolates the presence of the endosymbionts from the ambient plume chemistry, showing that the physical environment alone does not trigger shell thickening without bacterial colonization. Eliminating this rival causal explanation substantially strengthens the marine biologist's conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument into its premises, unstated assumptions, and conclusion.
Premise: Gastropods in sulfide plumes have endosymbionts and thicker shells; gastropods in iron plumes lack both. Conclusion: Endosymbionts causally promote shell thickening. Key Gap: The observed correlation might be driven by the sulfide-rich environment itself rather than bacterial metabolism.
Identifying the inferential leap from correlation to causation allows targeted evaluation of potential strengtheners.
2
Analyze the logical impact of the supplementary experimental finding.
The finding shows that introducing the snail to the sulfide plume is insufficient on its own to produce thicker shells; shell thickening happens only when bacterial colonization succeeds.
This establishes covariation while holding environmental surroundings constant, ruling out the background water chemistry as an independent cause.
3
Judge whether the statement correctly characterizes the finding as a strengthener.
Because ruling out a major confounding explanation increases the plausibility of the author's causal claim, the finding does strengthen the argument, making the statement True.
A claim that eliminates a rival causal mechanism functions as a valid strengthener under LSAT standards.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening causal claims by ruling out confounding environmental variables and demonstrating controlled covariation
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 8Soru →

The following two passages explore the evolutionary origins of human rhythmic entrainment.

Passage A
The human capacity for entrainment—the ability to physically synchronize to an external auditory beat—is remarkably rare among mammals. While some evolutionary theorists posit that this capacity emerged as a direct adaptation for social bonding, a more parsimonious explanation views human rhythm as an evolutionary byproduct, or spandrel, of bipedal locomotion. The transition to upright walking was a biomechanical revolution that demanded complex, highly regular neurological timing mechanisms simply to maintain physical balance and coordinate alternating limb movements. Over millions of years, as these crucial oscillatory neural networks became deeply established in the hominid motor cortex, they were subsequently co-opted by the auditory system. This cross-wiring allowed early humans to process and physically respond to periodic acoustic patterns. Thus, under this framework, our profound physiological response to a musical beat is not a specialized adaptation for group cohesion, but essentially a neurological echo of our ancestors' adaptation to walking. The ability to keep a beat was never selected for its own sake; rather, it hitched a ride on the crucial evolutionary imperative of navigating the savanna on two feet.

Passage B
In attempting to locate the evolutionary origins of human rhythm, biomechanical reductionists often overlook the severe communicative necessities and intense survival pressures of early hominid societies. Shared rhythmic behavior cannot be adequately explained without recognizing its immense adaptive value in group survival. Long before the development of complex syntax, synchronized group vocalizations and percussive movements served as early forms of 'social glue.' These communal rhythmic rituals functioned to lower intragroup aggression, coordinate collective labor, and signal group strength to rival bands. Furthermore, if rhythmic capabilities were merely an incidental mechanical byproduct of locomotion, we would not expect to see the intense neurochemical rewards—such as the release of oxytocin and endorphins—that humans universally experience during synchronized group drumming or dancing. These dedicated, deeply embedded neurological reward pathways strongly indicate that rhythmic synchronization was directly and selectively favored for its socially cohesive properties. Natural selection actively shaped the human brain to reward synchronous rhythmic behavior because groups that danced and drummed together were substantially more likely to survive, cooperate, and reproduce than those that did not.

Statement: Based on the argument in Passage A, Author A would evaluate the "intense neurochemical rewards" cited by Author B as compelling evidence that rhythmic entrainment was selectively favored for its adaptive value in social bonding.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The statement is definitively false because Author A's entire argument rests on the premise that rhythmic entrainment is an evolutionary byproduct of bipedalism. Author A explicitly contrasts this with the view that it is a direct adaptation for social bonding. Therefore, Author A would reject Author B's interpretation that neurochemical rewards prove rhythm was selectively favored for social cohesion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify Author A's core thesis regarding the evolution of rhythmic entrainment.
Author A argues that rhythm is an evolutionary byproduct of bipedal locomotion, explicitly contrasting this with the view that it is a direct adaptation for social bonding.
Establishing Author A's baseline framework is necessary to predict their response to new evidence or opposing claims.
2
Analyze Author B's argument concerning 'intense neurochemical rewards'.
Author B uses the existence of these rewards to argue against the byproduct theory, positing that they indicate rhythm was selectively favored for social cohesion.
Understanding the function of the specific detail in Passage B clarifies what the inference is evaluating.
3
Evaluate the provided statement by applying Author A's framework to Author B's evidence.
The statement claims Author A would see the rewards as compelling evidence for the social adaptation theory. Because Author A explicitly rejects the social adaptation theory in favor of the byproduct theory, Author A would certainly not interpret the rewards as proof of social adaptation.
Cross-author inference requires strictly maintaining the targeted author's perspective without bleeding the second author's conclusions into it.

Anahtar Kavram

Cross-Author Perspective Evaluation and Viewpoint Consistency
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 9Soru →

Clara: High schools should require all students to complete a personal finance course before graduating, as understanding budgeting and credit is essential for adult independence.

David: High schools should not mandate personal finance courses; students already carry too many graduation requirements, and basic financial literacy is more appropriately taught by parents at home.

Statement: Clara and David disagree over whether a personal finance course should be a mandatory graduation requirement in high schools.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement correctly describes an explicit point of disagreement between the speakers. Clara advocates for mandating personal finance as a graduation requirement, while David directly opposes making the course mandatory. Because both speakers commit to clear, opposite viewpoints on the proposition, the statement is true.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the first speaker's position
Clara explicitly states that high schools should require all students to take a personal finance course prior to graduation.
To identify Clara's commitment regarding the mandatory status of the course.
2
Analyze the second speaker's position
David explicitly states that high schools should not mandate personal finance courses for graduation.
To identify David's commitment regarding the mandatory status of the course.
3
Compare both positions against the given statement
Clara answers 'yes' to mandating the course for graduation, while David answers 'no'. Thus, the statement accurately identifies a point of disagreement.
A point of disagreement requires both parties to take opposing stances on the exact same proposition.

Anahtar Kavram

Point of Disagreement Identification
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 10Soru →

Marit: Electric utility providers should be legally barred from remotely adjusting residential smart thermostats during periods of peak power demand. Consumers purchase these devices under the reasonable expectation of personal autonomy over their domestic environment, and overriding consumer settings without real-time affirmative consent constitutes an unacceptable infringement on consumer liberty, regardless of any subsequent billing credits provided.

Corin: Utility infrastructure operates as an interdependent communal network. When extreme weather events precipitate severe capacity deficits that threaten catastrophic regional blackouts, utility operators must possess the legal authority to enact mandatory, temporary thermostat adjustments. Safeguarding the reliability of the entire electrical grid takes precedence over individual preferences regarding immediate indoor climate control.

Statement: Marit and Corin disagree over whether preserving power grid stability during severe capacity deficits justifies utility providers remotely adjusting residential thermostats without consumer consent.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The evaluation of True is correct because Marit and Corin commit to diametrically opposed truth values regarding the stated proposition. Marit affirms that individual autonomy prohibits non-consensual remote adjustments during peak demand periods regardless of external circumstances, while Corin explicitly argues that severe grid threats supersede individual preference and grant operators the authority to enact such adjustments.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the first speaker's explicit premise and conclusion
Marit establishes a strict principle that remote thermostat adjustments by utilities without affirmative consent violate personal liberty and should be prohibited, even when compensation is provided during peak demand.
Identifying the first speaker's scope of commitment establishes the benchmark for potential points of disagreement.
2
Analyze the second speaker's explicit premise and conclusion
Corin asserts that communal grid reliability during emergency capacity shortfalls outweighs individual domestic preferences, granting utilities the necessity and authority to mandate temporary adjustments.
Determining the second speaker's stance reveals whether they directly engage with or bypass the first speaker's principle.
3
Apply the two-speaker test to the proposed statement
Marit would answer 'No' (grid stability cannot justify non-consensual curtailment) while Corin would answer 'Yes' (grid stability does justify mandatory curtailment).
A valid point of disagreement requires one speaker to affirm the proposition while the other speaker explicitly denies it.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying a Point of Disagreement via the Two-Speaker Test
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 11Soru →

For the first half of the twentieth century, the consensus among Western Mayanists, heavily influenced by the eminent scholar J. Eric S. Thompson, maintained that Classic Maya hieroglyphic inscriptions were exclusively esoteric and non-historical. Thompson posited that the monumental texts carved onto stone stelae and temple walls recorded only calendrical computations, astronomical cycles, and mystical pantheons, arguing that the Maya elite were peaceful priest-astronomers preoccupied solely with time and the cosmos. Under this prevailing framework, the glyphs were viewed as ideographic symbols representing abstract astrological forces rather than a linguistic script recording actual human history.

This long-standing paradigm was fundamentally disrupted in 1960 when architectural draftsman and Mayanist Tatiana Proskouriakoff published a landmark analysis of the monumental corpus at Piedras Negras, Guatemala. Rather than attempting a phonetic translation of individual characters, Proskouriakoff adopted a structural and chronological method. She observed that the stelae at Piedras Negras were clustered in front of specific architectural complexes and that the physical layout corresponded to distinct chronological sequences. When she calculated the temporal intervals spanned by each distinct cluster of monuments, she discovered that no single sequence exceeded sixty-four years—a duration remarkably congruent with an average human lifespan.

Within these chronological groupings, Proskouriakoff identified consistent configurations of recurring glyphs paired with precise dates. In particular, each series began with an 'initial event' glyph, typically followed between twelve and thirty-one years later by an 'accession' glyph—designated the 'toothache glyph' due to its depiction of a head bound with a knotted textile. Proskouriakoff deduced that the initial date recorded the biological birth of a specific ruler, while the subsequent glyph denoted that ruler's formal coronation or ascension to political authority. Additional recurring glyphs within the same series corresponded to military conquests, alliances, and ultimately the ruler's physical demise.

Proskouriakoff’s findings proved conclusively that Maya inscriptions functioned as dynastic histories documenting the biographies, lineage, and political exploits of real historical monarchs. Crucially, she achieved this breakthrough entirely through pattern recognition and statistical distribution, demonstrating the historical nature of the texts well before the phonetic decipherment model pioneered by Soviet linguist Yuri Knorozov achieved widespread acceptance among Western scholars.

Statement: According to the passage, Tatiana Proskouriakoff demonstrated that the Piedras Negras inscriptions documented the dynastic biographies of actual historical rulers prior to the widespread Western academic acceptance of Yuri Knorozov's phonetic decipherment.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True: The passage explicitly confirms that Proskouriakoff established the historical and dynastic content of the inscriptions before Knorozov's phonetic decipherment achieved widespread acceptance among Western scholars.
The passage directly asserts in the concluding sentence that Proskouriakoff demonstrated the historical and dynastic character of Maya monumental inscriptions before Yuri Knorozov's phonetic decipherment model gained widespread acceptance in Western scholarship.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the specific references to Tatiana Proskouriakoff's findings and Yuri Knorozov in the passage.
The final paragraph explicitly mentions both Proskouriakoff's conclusions regarding dynastic biographies and the relative timing of Knorozov's phonetic decipherment.
Explicit detail questions require locating direct textual evidence without relying on unstated assumptions.
2
Compare the statement's claims against the retrieved textual details.
The text states that Proskouriakoff proved the inscriptions were 'dynastic histories documenting the biographies, lineage, and political exploits of real historical monarchs' and accomplished this 'well before the phonetic decipherment model pioneered by Soviet linguist Yuri Knorozov achieved widespread acceptance among Western scholars.'
Verification of qualifiers and chronological order ensures an exact match with the passage statements.
3
Determine the truth value of the evaluated statement.
The statement accurately reflects the passage's explicit facts in every respect.
Confirming complete alignment between the statement and the explicit text establishes that the statement is true.

Anahtar Kavram

Direct Information Retrieval and Chronological Detail Verification
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 12Soru →

Passage:
Every spring and autumn, the bar-headed goose (*Anser indicus*) undertakes a trans-Himalayan migration, traversing high-altitude passes exceeding 7,000 meters above sea level where the partial pressure of atmospheric oxygen (PO2P_{\text{O}_2}) is less than half that at sea level. Sustaining the immense metabolic power output required for flapping flight in such severely hypoxic conditions requires a suite of specialized physiological adaptations operating across every tier of the oxygen transport cascade.

At the level of pulmonary gas exchange, *Anser indicus* exhibits significantly deeper and more rapid ventilation than lowland waterfowl species. In most mammals and lowland birds, severe hyperventilation precipitates extreme hypocapnia (a critical drop in arterial carbon dioxide tension), which typically triggers cerebral vasoconstriction and subsequent cerebral ischemia. Bar-headed geese, however, possess specialized cerebral vascular autoregulatory mechanisms: their cerebral arterioles remain refractory to hypocapnia-induced constriction, thereby maintaining stable cerebral blood perfusion and preventing hypoxia-mediated syncope during strenuous flight.

Complementing this respiratory control is a structurally modified hemoglobin molecule with an exceptionally high intrinsic oxygen affinity. Comparative crystallographic analysis reveals that this elevated affinity arises primarily from a single amino acid substitution on the α\alpha-globin subunit—specifically, the replacement of a bulky proline residue at position 119 with an alanine residue (α119Pro→Ala\alpha 119\text{Pro}\rightarrow\text{Ala}). This substitution eliminates an interface van der Waals contact between the α1\alpha_1 and β2\beta_2 subunits, destabilizing the low-affinity deoxygenated (Tense) quaternary conformation and thereby shifting the allosteric equilibrium toward the high-affinity oxygenated (Relaxed) state.

Finally, oxygen utilization in peripheral flight tissues is enhanced through distinct histological and biochemical modifications in the pectoralis muscle. Capillary density per muscle fiber in *Anser indicus* is approximately thirty percent greater than in related lowland geese, effectively reducing diffusion distances between circulating erythrocytes and the sarcolemma. Furthermore, subsarcolemmal mitochondria within these fibers are localized in close proximity to adjacent capillaries rather than clustered deep within the myofibrillar core, minimizing intracellular oxygen diffusion pathways. Crucially, metabolic enzyme profiling indicates that during high-altitude transit, the flight musculature relies almost exclusively on fatty acid beta-oxidation rather than glycogenolysis, maximizing energy yield per unit mass of substrate.

Statement: According to the passage, the structural basis for the elevated oxygen affinity of bar-headed goose hemoglobin is a single amino acid substitution located on the α\alpha-globin subunit that destabilizes the molecule's deoxygenated conformation.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

The statement is true because the passage explicitly attributes the increased oxygen affinity of bar-headed goose hemoglobin to a single amino acid substitution on the alpha-globin subunit that destabilizes its deoxygenated quaternary conformation.
The passage explicitly affirms in paragraph 3 that the elevated oxygen affinity of *Anser indicus* hemoglobin stems primarily from a single amino acid substitution on the alpha-globin subunit (alpha 119 Pro to Ala) that eliminates an interface contact and destabilizes the deoxygenated (Tense) conformation, thereby shifting the equilibrium toward the oxygenated state.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the portion of the passage discussing hemoglobin structure and oxygen affinity.
Identified paragraph 3, which details the molecular and crystallographic basis of hemoglobin in *Anser indicus*.
Explicit detail retrieval requires matching the key terms in the statement ('elevated oxygen affinity', 'single amino acid substitution', 'alpha-globin subunit', 'deoxygenated conformation') to the exact textual source.
2
Compare the specific claims in the statement against the explicit text in paragraph 3.
Paragraph 3 states: 'elevated affinity arises primarily from a single amino acid substitution on the α\alpha-globin subunit... destabilizing the low-affinity deoxygenated (Tense) quaternary conformation'.
To verify whether all elements of the candidate statement precisely match the passage without alteration of qualifiers or mechanisms.
3
Conclude whether the statement is supported as true or unsupported/false.
Every element of the statement is explicitly confirmed by the passage.
The statement directly paraphrases the explicit factual claims regarding subunit location and conformation destabilization.

Anahtar Kavram

Direct textual retrieval of molecular and physiological mechanisms explicitly stated in an academic passage.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 13Soru →

In the state of New Lemuria, a strict building code was implemented requiring all new residential constructions to utilize advanced fire-resistant materials. Over the five years following the implementation of this code, the absolute number of newly constructed homes that experienced a residential fire was exactly 20% higher than the number of newly constructed homes that experienced a fire during the five years immediately prior to the code. Nevertheless, the state's fire marshal concluded that the new building code was highly effective in reducing the likelihood that any newly constructed home would experience a fire.

Statement: The apparent discrepancy between the fire incident data and the fire marshal's conclusion is successfully resolved if it is true that the total number of newly constructed homes built in New Lemuria during the five years after the code was implemented was exactly 10% greater than the total number of newly constructed homes built during the five years prior.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The statement is False because it fails to mathematically reconcile the evidence with the conclusion. If the absolute number of fires increased by 20%, but the total number of homes only increased by 10%, the rate (likelihood) of fire per home must have increased. This directly contradicts the fire marshal's conclusion that the likelihood decreased. To resolve the paradox, the percentage increase in total homes would have to be strictly greater than the percentage increase in fires (e.g., a 30% increase in homes).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the two apparently contradictory premises in the stimulus.
Premise 1: The absolute number of fires in new homes increased by 20%. Premise 2: The fire marshal concluded that the likelihood (rate) of a new home catching fire decreased.
Resolving the paradox requires finding a fact that allows both the absolute number of incidents to rise and the rate of incidents to fall simultaneously.
2
Define the mathematical relationship between absolute numbers and likelihood (rates).
The rate of fire is equal to the absolute number of fires divided by the total number of homes built (Rate=FiresHomesRate = \frac{Fires}{Homes}).
This formula connects the evidence (absolute numbers) to the conclusion (likelihood).
3
Evaluate the mathematical impact of the proposed statement on the established relationship.
The statement posits a 10% increase in total homes. Given a 20% increase in fires, the new rate is 1.20×Fires1.10×Homes\frac{1.20 \times Fires}{1.10 \times Homes}, which is approximately 1.091.09 times the old rate.
Calculating the precise impact determines if the statement actually resolves the contradiction.
4
Compare the resulting rate to the fire marshal's conclusion.
The calculation shows the rate of fire increased by about 9%, which directly contradicts the fire marshal's conclusion that the likelihood decreased.
A statement that contradicts a premise or conclusion in the stimulus exacerbates rather than resolves the paradox.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing between absolute numbers and proportional rates, and understanding the mathematical constraints required for a baseline shift to resolve a discrepancy between the two.
Soru 14Soru →

Consider the following excerpt from an essay on Mesoamerican archaeology:

"Recent spatial re-evaluations of Classic Maya E-Group architectural assemblages—long assumed to function strictly as precise equinoctial observatories based on early twentieth-century excavations at Uaxactún—have benefited substantially from regional airborne LiDAR mapping. By demonstrating that numerous E-Groups deviate systematically from true solar cardinal alignments, modern landscape archaeologists have rightly challenged the orthodox celestial-mechanics model. Yet, several prominent revisionists overcorrect when they dismiss astronomical intent entirely, relegating these monumental complexes to mere theatrical stages for dynastic legitimation. While symbolic political display was unquestionably central to lowland Maya civic planning, entirely decoupling these alignments from observational horizon astronomy overlooks the deliberate, if stylized, solar phenomenologies repeatedly evidenced in contemporaneous hieroglyphic almanacs."

The author's attitude toward the revisionist scholars who reject astronomical intent in Maya E-Group assemblages can be accurately described as an acknowledgment of their empirical challenge tempered by criticism of their sweeping interpretive conclusions.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True, because the author explicitly validates the empirical challenge mounted by revisionists while criticizing their extreme interpretive dismissal of astronomical purpose.
The statement accurately captures the author's dual stance: the author explicitly commends the empirical disruption of the older orthodox view ('rightly challenged') while simultaneously rebuking the revisionists' excessive conclusion ('overcorrect when they dismiss astronomical intent entirely').

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the author's positive or concessive statements regarding the revisionist scholars.
The author notes that researchers 'have rightly challenged the orthodox celestial-mechanics model' through LiDAR mapping.
This establishes that the author respects and credits the empirical findings that disprove pure astronomical precision.
2
Identify the author's reservations, qualifications, or critical pivots regarding the revisionists.
The author introduces a pivot with 'Yet, several prominent revisionists overcorrect when they dismiss astronomical intent entirely' and argues that this 'overlooks' pertinent hieroglyphic evidence.
This demonstrates that the author opposes the revisionists' total rejection of astronomical significance.
3
Synthesize the two aspects of the author's perspective to evaluate the given statement.
The author's stance combines validation of empirical contributions with criticism of theoretical overreach, matching the characterization in the statement.
Accurate tone identification on the LSAT requires capturing both the positive concessions and the critical limitations expressed by the author.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying qualified authorial tone combining concession and critique
Soru 15Soru →

Read the following passage:

In analyzing the historical development of maritime risk allocation, legal historians often point to the ancient Mediterranean principle of general average, codified in Roman jurisprudence through the Lex Rhodia de iactu. Under this doctrine, when cargo is intentionally jettisoned during a tempest to preserve the vessel, the resulting financial loss is apportioned proportionally among all stakeholders whose property survived. While conventional legal treatises characterize this principle primarily as an early form of mutual insurance, legal historian Elena Vance argues that its essential historical function was procedural rather than compensatory. Vance contends that without a mandated pre-contractual rule of contribution, merchants aboard a foundering ship would inevitably engage in protracted, self-interested disputes over whose goods should be cast overboard first, paralyzing emergency decision-making. Thus, Vance observes that Roman praetorian edicts specifically penalized shipmasters who attempted to calculate exact property valuations prior to executing emergency jettisons.

Statement: In the context of the passage, the reference to Roman praetorian edicts penalizing pre-jettison property valuations serves primarily to offer historical evidence supporting Vance's claim that the doctrine prioritized rapid emergency action over precise compensatory accounting.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement accurately reflects the structural role of the referenced detail. Vance's thesis asserts that the primary purpose of the jettison rule was procedural efficiency during a crisis rather than compensatory fairness. The mention of praetorian edicts penalizing valuation delays serves as direct historical evidence illustrating that Roman law actively prioritized immediate vessel preservation over financial calculations.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the target detail in the passage text
The target detail is Vance's observation that Roman praetorian edicts penalized shipmasters who attempted to calculate exact property valuations prior to emergency jettisons.
Function-of-detail questions require locating the exact phrase to analyze its immediate surrounding context.
2
Determine the argumentative claim immediately preceding the detail
Vance argues that the Lex Rhodia was procedural—aimed at preventing fatal delays caused by merchant disputes over cargo value during an emergency, rather than merely acting as an insurance scheme.
Details in academic arguments typically serve to illustrate, qualify, or provide empirical support for the author's or cited theorist's claims.
3
Evaluate the structural relationship between the detail and the thesis
The edicts punishing delays for valuation demonstrate that Roman legal authorities actively enforced rapid crisis response over precise financial accounting, directly supporting Vance's central claim.
Aligning the functional role with the statement confirms that the statement accurately describes the rhetorical purpose of the detail.

Anahtar Kavram

Rhetorical Function of Corroborative Historical Detail
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 16Soru →

Consider the following premises regarding the state judiciary:

Every judge appointed to the appellate court has over a decade of trial experience. Most judges appointed to the appellate court have published legal scholarship. None of the judges who have published legal scholarship sit on the disciplinary board.

Based on these premises, the following deduction must logically be true:
Most judges with over a decade of trial experience do not sit on the disciplinary board.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

The statement is False because it commits a quantifier overreach error, attempting to apply a characteristic of a specific subset (appellate judges) to the majority of a broader superset (judges with trial experience).
The deduction provided in the stem is invalid. It correctly chains the premises to realize that most appellate judges do not sit on the board. However, it illegally extends that conclusion to state that most judges with a decade of trial experience do not sit on the board. We only know that *some* (at least the appellate judges) do not. We do not have information about the rest of the judges with trial experience.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Map the formal logic of the premises.
Premise 1: All Appellate Judges (AJ) -> Trial Experience (TE). Premise 2: Most AJ -> Published (P). Premise 3: No P -> Disciplinary Board (DB), which means All P -> ~DB.
Translating statements into formal notation clarifies the boundaries of the quantifier relationships.
2
Chain the 'Most' and 'None/All' premises to form a valid intermediate deduction.
Combine Premise 2 (Most AJ -> P) with Premise 3 (All P -> ~DB) to deduce: Most AJ -> ~DB (Most appellate judges do not sit on the disciplinary board).
In quantifier logic, combining a 'Most' statement with an 'All/None' statement yields a valid 'Most' statement if the 'Most' group points to the sufficient condition of the 'All' group.
3
Evaluate the relationship between the intermediate deduction and the target group.
We know 'Most AJ -> ~DB' and 'All AJ -> TE'. The deduction asks if 'Most TE -> ~DB' must be true.
We must test if the target conclusion strictly follows from the relationship between AJ and TE.
4
Determine the validity of the final deduction.
Invalid. Because AJ is a subset of TE, we can only conclude that 'Some TE -> ~DB'. We cannot conclude 'Most TE' share any characteristic because the broader group of TE judges could be infinitely larger than the AJ subset.
Moving from a subset to a superset only guarantees a 'Some' relationship, never a 'Most' relationship without additional numerical data.

Anahtar Kavram

Quantifier Logic (Some, Most, All)
Soru 17Soru →

Passage:
In medieval and early modern European maritime jurisprudence, the legal characterization of the foenus nauticum (maritime bottomry loan) posed an enduring challenge to canonical prohibitions against usury. Because the lender bore the ultimate risk of maritime casualty—forfeiting both principal and accrued premium if the vessel was lost at sea—scholastic jurists traditionally categorized the elevated repayment not as illicit interest on a standard loan (mutuum), but as a legitimate indemnity for assuming maritime peril (periculum sortis). However, this doctrinal justification encountered substantial tension in sixteenth-century commercial practice when merchant syndicates began separating risk transfer from capital financing through independent insurance underwriters. When merchants secured standalone insurance policies for their vessels while continuing to negotiate bottomry bonds, lenders were frequently insulated from genuine loss through subrogation agreements. As the legal commentator René-Josué Valin observed, such dual contractual arrangements effectively stripped the maritime loan of its authentic risk-bearing character, reducing it functionally to an evasive device used to circumvent statutory interest ceilings.

Statement:
In the passage, the author references René-Josué Valin's observation primarily to identify an authoritative legal assessment demonstrating how evolving commercial arrangements undermined the traditional doctrinal defense of maritime loans.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True. The reference to René-Josué Valin's observation serves to illustrate how changes in commercial contracting removed the risk factor that historically legitimized maritime loans under anti-usury doctrine.
The claim is true because the citation of René-Josué Valin directly illustrates the passage's concluding point: that concurrent insurance practices eliminated the lender's exposure to loss, thereby invalidating the scholastic argument (periculum sortis) that previously shielded such loans from usury laws.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the cited detail and its immediate rhetorical context
René-Josué Valin is mentioned in the final sentence immediately following the discussion of sixteenth-century merchants combining bottomry bonds with separate insurance coverage.
Understanding the function of a detail requires analyzing both what it says and how it connects to the surrounding argumentative steps.
2
Trace the broader argumentative progression of the passage
The passage moves from (1) the scholastic rule permitting high-interest maritime loans solely due to lender risk, to (2) commercial innovations that separated risk from capital via insurance, to (3) the conclusion that this innovation stripped the loans of their doctrinal legitimacy.
A detail's primary purpose in LSAT Reading Comprehension is defined by its role in supporting, qualifying, or advancing the author's broader thesis.
3
Evaluate whether the statement matches this structural relationship
The statement correctly claims that Valin's observation serves to demonstrate how evolving commercial arrangements undermined the traditional doctrinal defense.
The statement accurately captures the function without confusing the literal content with its rhetorical objective.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing the rhetorical function of a specific textual detail within an argument's broader structure.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 18Soru →

Botanist: Any plant species that thrives in highly alkaline soil must possess an extensive taproot system. The newly discovered Silene deserti thrives in highly alkaline soil. Therefore, Silene deserti must be capable of surviving prolonged periods of drought.

Statement: The assumption that 'any plant species capable of surviving prolonged periods of drought possesses an extensive taproot system' is sufficient to logically guarantee the botanist's conclusion.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The statement is false because the provided assumption is an illegal reversal. To guarantee that Silene deserti can survive a drought, the assumption must state that having an extensive taproot (which we know the plant has) is sufficient to ensure survival during a drought. Instead, the statement claims that surviving a drought requires an extensive taproot, which completely fails to prove the botanist's conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premises and the conclusion of the argument.
Premise 1: Thrives in alkaline soil guarantees an extensive taproot. Premise 2: Silene deserti thrives in alkaline soil. Conclusion: Silene deserti survives prolonged drought.
Deconstructing the argument is the first step in identifying any deductive gaps.
2
Determine the intermediate inference supported by the premises.
Because Silene deserti thrives in alkaline soil, it can be logically deduced that it possesses an extensive taproot system.
This establishes exactly what is already proven about Silene deserti before attempting to validate the final conclusion.
3
Identify the logical gap between the intermediate inference and the final conclusion.
The argument establishes that the plant has an extensive taproot, but concludes it can survive droughts. The required sufficient assumption must bridge this gap: Extensive taproot guarantees survival during prolonged drought.
A sufficient assumption must guarantee the conclusion based entirely on the existing premises.
4
Evaluate the proposed assumption in the statement.
The statement proposes: Surviving prolonged drought guarantees an extensive taproot. This is the reverse of what is mathematically needed.
Reversing the necessary and sufficient conditions fails to guarantee the conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Illegal Reversals in Sufficient Assumptions
Soru 19Soru →

Read the stimulus below. Is the provided statement regarding the argument's logical flaw true or false?

Stimulus:
Sports Physiologist: The national cycling team uses a new carbon-fiber bicycle frame, while the regional team uses standard aluminum frames. In recent trials, the national team riders recorded an average speed 15 percent slower than the regional team. However, the national team was testing their bikes on a mountainous outdoor course with steep inclines, whereas the regional team rode on a flat indoor track. Therefore, if the national team had ridden on the flat indoor track, their average speed would have been significantly faster than that of the regional team.

Statement to Evaluate:
The sports physiologist's argument is flawed because it concludes that removing a comparative disadvantage will not only eliminate a performance gap but actually reverse the disparity, without providing evidence that the national team possesses an inherent advantage.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True. The statement accurately describes the logical flaw in the argument.
The provided statement is true because it perfectly distills the argument's logical error into abstract terms. The physiologist establishes that a severe environmental disadvantage (a mountainous course) likely caused the national team's slower times. However, the physiologist leaps to the conclusion that on equal footing (a flat track), the national team would be 'significantly faster.' There is absolutely no evidence in the stimulus demonstrating that the national team or their carbon-fiber bikes are inherently superior. Removing a disadvantage might equalize the speeds, or the national team might still be slower for other reasons.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the argument's premises.
Premise 1: National team (slower) rode on a difficult mountainous course. Premise 2: Regional team (faster) rode on an easy flat track.
To understand the factual evidence provided for the conclusion.
2
Identify the argument's conclusion.
Conclusion: If the national team rode on the flat track, they would be significantly faster than the regional team.
To determine the exact claim that requires logical support.
3
Evaluate the logical gap between the premises and the conclusion.
The premises explain why the national team was slower (an environmental disadvantage). However, they provide no evidence that the national team is inherently faster. Removing the mountain handicap might equalize their speeds, or they might still be slower due to other factors.
To pinpoint the precise flaw in the reasoning.
4
Compare the logical gap to the provided statement.
The statement explicitly describes this gap: concluding that removing a disadvantage reverses the disparity without evidence of inherent superiority. Thus, the statement is true.
To determine if the statement correctly matches the identified flaw.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying unwarranted assumptions regarding the reversal of disparities when confounding variables are eliminated.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 20Soru →

Historian: A number of academics attribute the rapid disintegration of the Ruvonian Empire primarily to external invasions, citing the unprecedented number of border incursions recorded during the empire's final decade. However, this interpretation fundamentally confuses cause and effect. Two decades prior to these incursions, a sudden devaluation of the empire's currency triggered a severe economic depression that left the government unable to fund its military. This internal decay resulted in completely undefended frontiers. Therefore, the late surge in border incursions was a symptom of the empire's disintegration, not the underlying cause of it.

Statement: The historian attacks the academics' argument by demonstrating that the very evidence they cite to support their causal claim actually proves that the reverse causal relationship holds.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The statement is false because it mischaracterizes the structural mechanics of the historian's argument. The historian does indeed conclude that the causal relationship is the reverse of what the academics claim (arguing that the empire's disintegration led to the border incursions, not vice versa). However, the historian does not demonstrate this by showing that the academics' own evidence (the record of border incursions) proves this reverse relationship. Instead, the historian introduces completely new evidence—a historical currency devaluation and subsequent economic collapse—to establish the true cause. The academics' evidence is ultimately reinterpreted as a symptom of the new evidence provided, rather than serving as the proof of the reverse relationship itself.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the causal claim made by the opposing party (the academics).
The academics claim that external invasions (border incursions) caused the disintegration of the Ruvonian Empire.
Understanding the target of the critique is necessary to evaluate how the historian attacks it.
2
Identify the specific evidence cited by the academics to support their claim.
The academics cite the 'unprecedented number of border incursions recorded during the empire's final decade' as their evidence.
The statement specifically claims the historian uses this exact evidence to prove the reverse relationship.
3
Analyze the historian's conclusion regarding the causal relationship.
The historian concludes that the causal relationship is reversed: internal decay and disintegration caused the border incursions, making the incursions a 'symptom'.
This determines if the second half of the statement ('proves that the reverse causal relationship holds') accurately reflects the conclusion.
4
Evaluate whether the historian uses the academics' evidence to prove this reverse relationship.
The historian introduces entirely new historical evidence (currency devaluation, economic depression, inability to fund the military) to prove the reverse relationship, rather than using the academics' evidence to prove it.
This determines the accuracy of the first half of the statement ('demonstrating that the very evidence they cite... actually proves').
5
Compare findings to the given statement.
Because the historian relies on new evidence rather than the academics' evidence to establish the reversed causality, the structural description in the statement is false.
An accurate method of reasoning description must correctly identify both the conclusion drawn and the precise premises used to draw it.

Anahtar Kavram

Accurately identifying the specific premises used to reach a conclusion in an argument's method of reasoning.
Sayfa 1 / 22Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — LSAT | Examkin