Chaining Conditional Statements

26 soru

Soru 21Soru →

City planners have established new zoning rules for metropolitan districts. Under these rules, a district is zoned for mixed-use development only if both its transit hub is expanded and high-density housing is subsidized. The rules also stipulate that a district's commercial tax rate will increase if small business grants are not offered. Furthermore, high-density housing is subsidized only if the commercial tax rate does not increase, and unless the historic preservation board approves the plan, the transit hub will not be expanded.

Which one of the following conclusions can be logically drawn from the zoning rules described above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Any district that is zoned for mixed-use development must also offer small business grants.

Cevap

Any district that is zoned for mixed-use development must also offer small business grants.
The stimulus provides a continuous logical chain. If a district is zoned for mixed-use development, it must subsidize high-density housing. Subsidizing high-density housing requires that the commercial tax rate does not increase. Because the tax rate will increase if small business grants are not offered, the fact that the tax rate does NOT increase means small business grants MUST be offered (the contrapositive of the second rule). Linking these together demonstrates that zoning for mixed-use development logically guarantees that small business grants are offered.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Translate the first zoning rule into formal logic.
Mixed-use development (MUD) -> Transit hub expanded (TE) AND High-density housing subsidized (HDS).
The phrase 'only if both' indicates that expanding the transit hub and subsidizing high-density housing are necessary conditions for mixed-use development.
2
Translate the second zoning rule into formal logic.
Small business grants NOT offered (~SBG) -> Commercial tax rate increases (CTR).
The word 'if' introduces a sufficient condition. A lack of grants guarantees a tax rate increase.
3
Translate the third zoning rule into formal logic.
High-density housing subsidized (HDS) -> Commercial tax rate does NOT increase (~CTR).
The phrase 'only if' introduces a necessary condition. Subsidizing housing requires that the tax rate remains stable.
4
Form the contrapositive of the second rule to establish a logical bridge.
Commercial tax rate does NOT increase (~CTR) -> Small business grants offered (SBG).
To connect the chain from ~CTR, we must negate both sides of the second rule (~SBG -> CTR) and reverse them.
5
Chain the conditional statements together starting from mixed-use development.
MUD -> HDS -> ~CTR -> SBG.
Following the logical links from the sufficient condition (MUD) leads directly to the necessity of offering small business grants (SBG).

Anahtar Kavram

Chaining Conditional Statements
Soru 22Soru →

The ancient settlement discovered in the valley will be fully excavated only if the university secures the international heritage grant. The university, however, will not secure this grant unless the settlement's historical significance is definitively confirmed by a panel of independent experts. If the settlement's historical significance is definitively confirmed by such a panel, the local government will restrict commercial development in the surrounding region. Finally, the local government will restrict commercial development in the surrounding region only if public opinion strongly favors preservation.

Which of the following logically follows from the statements above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: If public opinion does not strongly favor preservation, the ancient settlement will not be fully excavated.

Cevap

If public opinion does not strongly favor preservation, the ancient settlement will not be fully excavated.
By diagramming and chaining the conditional statements provided in the stimulus, we get: Fully Excavated -> Secures Grant -> Significance Confirmed -> Restricts Development -> Public Opinion Favors Preservation. The contrapositive of this entire chain is: If Public Opinion does NOT favor preservation, then the settlement will NOT be fully excavated. The correct answer matches this contrapositive deduction exactly.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the first conditional relationship.
Fully Excavated -> Secures Grant
The phrase 'only if' introduces a necessary condition.
2
Identify the second conditional relationship.
Secures Grant -> Significance Confirmed
The phrase 'not... unless' translates logically to 'if... then'.
3
Identify the third conditional relationship.
Significance Confirmed -> Restricts Development
Standard 'if... then' construction.
4
Identify the fourth conditional relationship.
Restricts Development -> Public Opinion Favors Preservation
The phrase 'only if' introduces a necessary condition.
5
Chain the conditional statements together.
Fully Excavated -> Secures Grant -> Significance Confirmed -> Restricts Development -> Public Opinion Favors Preservation
The necessary condition of one statement matches the sufficient condition of the next.
6
Determine the contrapositive of the full chain.
Not Public Opinion Favors Preservation -> Not Restricts Development -> Not Significance Confirmed -> Not Secures Grant -> Not Fully Excavated
Valid deductions can be drawn by negating and reversing the entire conditional chain.
7
Evaluate the options against the derived chain and its contrapositive.
The correct answer links the negated end of the chain to the negated beginning of the chain.
This represents a logically valid Must Be True inference.

Anahtar Kavram

Chaining Conditional Statements and Forming Contrapositives
Soru 23Soru →

A city planning commission is establishing the zoning regulations for a new urban district. Match each set of proposed conditional zoning rules with the logically valid deduction that must follow from those rules.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

If a district approves retail zoning, it must require public parking facilities. Moreover, any district that requires public parking facilities must contain a subway station.
If a district approves retail zoning, it cannot require public parking facilities. Any district that does not require public parking facilities is ineligible to contain a subway station.
If a district rejects retail zoning, it is forced to require public parking facilities. Furthermore, a district can require public parking facilities only if it contains a subway station.
A district will contain a subway station only if it requires public parking facilities. Whenever a district requires public parking facilities, it is guaranteed to approve retail zoning.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct matches map each set of conditional premises to its validly chained contrapositive. Left 1 maps to Right 1; Left 2 maps to Right 2; Left 3 maps to Right 3; Left 4 maps to Right 4.
Each correct pair requires diagramming the two explicit premises, connecting them via their shared term to form a transitive chain, and then identifying the contrapositive of that full chain among the available deductions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Translate the first set of rules into formal logic.
Retail -> Parking; Parking -> Subway. Chain: Retail -> Subway.
Establishing the base conditional chain allows for valid deductions.
2
Derive the contrapositive for the first chain to find its match.
Not Subway -> Not Retail. This matches the rule stating a district lacking a subway cannot approve retail.
The direct chain (Retail -> Subway) does not appear in the options, so the valid inference must be its contrapositive.
3
Translate and chain the remaining rule sets, paying attention to negative terms and 'only if' indicators.
Left 2 yields Retail -> Not Subway. Left 3 yields Reject Retail -> Subway. Left 4 yields Subway -> Retail.
Terms like 'only if' always introduce necessary conditions, placing them on the right side of the conditional arrow.
4
Find the contrapositive for each remaining chain to complete the matches.
Left 2 contrapositive: Subway -> Reject Retail. Left 3 contrapositive: Not Subway -> Approve Retail. Left 4 contrapositive: Reject Retail -> Not Subway.
Matching the derived contrapositives perfectly aligns the rule sets with their logical deductions in the options.

Anahtar Kavram

Chaining Conditional Statements and Contrapositives
Soru 24Soru →

According to the newly established International Agricultural Export Protocol, if a shipment of crops contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs), it must be certified by the International Biosafety Board. The Board issues such certifications only if the crops' originating farm has passed a rigorous ecological impact assessment. A farm cannot pass this assessment unless its country of origin is a participating member of the Global Trade Pact. Furthermore, participating in the Global Trade Pact guarantees that a country adheres to strict tariff standardization.

Which one of the following logically follows from the statements above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: If a shipment of crops contains genetically modified organisms, the country of origin for those crops adheres to strict tariff standardization.

Cevap

If a shipment of crops contains genetically modified organisms, the country of origin for those crops adheres to strict tariff standardization.
The stimulus provides a series of linked conditional statements. Translating them reveals a continuous chain: GMO -> Certification -> EIA -> Trade Pact -> Tariff Standardization. By the transitive property of formal logic, if the first condition (GMO) is met, the final condition (Tariff Standardization) must logically follow. Therefore, if a shipment contains GMOs, its country of origin must adhere to strict tariff standardization.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Diagram the first conditional relationship regarding genetically modified organisms.
GMO -> Certified by Biosafety Board (CB)
The word 'if' introduces a sufficient condition, and 'must be' indicates the necessary condition.
2
Diagram the second conditional relationship regarding the Biosafety Board.
CB -> Passed Ecological Impact Assessment (EIA)
The phrase 'only if' introduces a necessary condition.
3
Diagram the third conditional relationship regarding the ecological impact assessment.
EIA -> Trade Pact Member (TP)
The phrase 'cannot... unless' means 'if not TP, then not EIA' (~TP -> ~EIA), which contraposes to EIA -> TP.
4
Diagram the fourth conditional relationship regarding the Global Trade Pact.
TP -> Tariff Standardization (TS)
The word 'guarantees' introduces a sufficient condition.
5
Combine the individual conditional statements into a single transitive chain.
GMO -> CB -> EIA -> TP -> TS
The necessary condition of each premise matches the sufficient condition of the subsequent premise.
6
Evaluate the answer choices based on the established formal logic chain.
The correct answer properly deduces GMO -> TS.
Any condition on the left side of a valid chain guarantees all conditions to its right.

Anahtar Kavram

Chaining Conditional Statements
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 25Soru →

A national health ministry is establishing new regulatory standards for clinical trials. The regulations are governed by the following conditional rules:

- Any trial that tests a novel medical device must undergo a rigorous safety audit.
- A rigorous safety audit is conducted only if the trial employs an independent oversight committee.
- If a trial employs an independent oversight committee, then it must allocate five percent of its budget to patient advocacy.
- A trial cannot employ an independent oversight committee if it is exclusively sponsored by a for-profit pharmaceutical company.
- Unless a trial allocates five percent of its budget to patient advocacy, it cannot qualify for the federal innovation grant.
- All trials that are exclusively sponsored by a for-profit pharmaceutical company must undergo a commercial viability review.

Match each proposed clinical trial profile below with the deductive inference that must logically follow from the regulations.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

A trial that tests a novel medical device
A trial exclusively sponsored by a for-profit pharmaceutical company
A trial that qualifies for the federal innovation grant but does not employ an independent oversight committee
A trial that fails to allocate five percent of its budget to patient advocacy

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct matches pair each trial profile with its necessary deductive inferences: 1) Testing a novel medical device pairs with employing an oversight committee and allocating budget to patient advocacy. 2) For-profit sponsorship pairs with undergoing a commercial viability review and being unable to test a novel device. 3) Qualifying for the federal grant without an oversight committee pairs with allocating budget to patient advocacy and avoiding a rigorous safety audit. 4) Failing to allocate budget to patient advocacy pairs with being unable to qualify for the federal grant and unable to test a novel medical device.
Each correct match is derived by applying the rules of formal logic—specifically transitive chaining and contrapositives—to the conditional regulations provided. Testing a novel device triggers a chain reaction leading to patient advocacy funding. Corporate sponsorship forbids the oversight committee, which backwards-chains to forbid testing a novel device. The federal grant requires patient advocacy, while lacking an oversight committee backwards-chains to forbid the safety audit. Failing to fund patient advocacy backwards-chains to eliminate the federal grant and all prerequisites leading up to patient advocacy.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Translate the regulatory rules into formal conditional statements using abbreviations.
Let ND = novel device, RSA = rigorous safety audit, IOC = independent oversight committee, PA = patient advocacy, FPC = for-profit pharmaceutical company, FIG = federal innovation grant, CVR = commercial viability review.
Rule 1: ND -> RSA
Rule 2: RSA -> IOC
Rule 3: IOC -> PA
Rule 4: FPC -> ~IOC
Rule 5: FIG -> PA (translated from 'Unless PA, ~FIG')
Rule 6: FPC -> CVR
Converting natural language with complex indicators ('only if', 'unless', 'cannot... if') into formal logic simplifies the deduction process and exposes transitive relationships.
2
Combine the conditional statements into logical chains.
Core Chain: ND -> RSA -> IOC -> PA
Branch 1: FPC -> ~IOC and FPC -> CVR
Branch 2: FIG -> PA
Contrapositive of Core Chain: ~PA -> ~IOC -> ~RSA -> ~ND
Connecting overlapping necessary and sufficient conditions creates the deductive pathways required to solve the question.
3
Analyze each trial profile against the established chains to identify the necessary inferences.
Profile 1 (ND): Following the Core Chain, ND guarantees RSA, IOC, and PA.
Profile 2 (FPC): FPC guarantees CVR, and triggers ~IOC. Through the contrapositive chain, ~IOC -> ~RSA -> ~ND.
Profile 3 (FIG and ~IOC): FIG guarantees PA. The condition ~IOC triggers the contrapositive ~IOC -> ~RSA -> ~ND. Thus, PA and ~RSA are deduced.
Profile 4 (~PA): Taking the contrapositive of Branch 2, ~PA -> ~FIG. Through the contrapositive of the Core Chain, ~PA -> ~IOC -> ~RSA -> ~ND. Thus, ~FIG and ~ND are deduced.
Matching the given conditions in the profiles to the beginning of the logical chains reveals all downstream deductions.

Anahtar Kavram

Chaining Conditional Statements and Contrapositives
Soru 26Soru →

The Board of Antiquities has issued the following directives for affiliated institutions: Any institution that acquires a Class I historical artifact must possess a reinforced subterranean vault. An institution is eligible for the federal preservation grant only if it acquires a Class I historical artifact. Furthermore, unless an institution maintains a specialized restoration laboratory, it cannot possess a reinforced subterranean vault. Finally, an institution can host the biennial symposium only if it is eligible for the federal preservation grant.

Based on the directives above, which of the following must be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: If an institution does not maintain a specialized restoration laboratory, it cannot host the biennial symposium.

Cevap

If an institution does not maintain a specialized restoration laboratory, it cannot host the biennial symposium.
Based on the formal logic chain derived from the directives, hosting the biennial symposium requires being eligible for the grant, which requires a Class I artifact, which requires a vault, which requires a restoration laboratory (HBS -> SRL). Therefore, by taking the contrapositive, if an institution lacks a restoration laboratory, it cannot host the biennial symposium (~SRL -> ~HBS).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Translate the first premise into formal logic
Acquires Class I (C1) -> Subterranean Vault (RSV)
The word 'Any' introduces a sufficient condition.
2
Translate the second premise into formal logic
Preservation Grant (FPG) -> Acquires Class I (C1)
The phrase 'only if' introduces a necessary condition.
3
Translate the third premise into formal logic
Subterranean Vault (RSV) -> Restoration Lab (SRL)
The word 'unless' means 'if not'. 'Unless SRL, ~RSV' translates to 'If RSV, then SRL'.
4
Translate the fourth premise into formal logic
Biennial Symposium (HBS) -> Preservation Grant (FPG)
The phrase 'only if' introduces a necessary condition.
5
Chain the statements and find the contrapositive
Chain: HBS -> FPG -> C1 -> RSV -> SRL. Contrapositive: ~SRL -> ~HBS
Connecting the necessary condition of one statement to the sufficient condition of another reveals the full logical chain. The contrapositive of this full chain must also be true.

Anahtar Kavram

Chaining conditional statements with various indicator words (any, only if, unless) and forming contrapositives.
ÖncekiSayfa 2 / 2
Chaining Conditional Statements Alıştırma Soruları — LSAT — Sayfa 2 | Examkin