Strengthen

75 soru

Soru 61Soru →

Organizational Sociologist: Over the past decade, corporations that transitioned to a "flat" organizational structure—eliminating middle-management tiers to foster direct communication between executives and frontline employees—have reported, on average, a 22 percent higher profit margin than competitors retaining traditional hierarchies. Therefore, it is clear that removing middle management directly enhances a corporation's profitability by accelerating the pace of strategic decision-making.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the organizational sociologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Corporations that eliminated middle-management tiers but subsequently mandated highly bureaucratic, time-consuming executive review protocols for all new initiatives did not experience any increase in profit margins.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option establishing that flat corporations which implemented time-consuming review protocols (failing to accelerate decision-making) did not experience increased profits.
The argument posits a specific causal chain: removing middle management leads to accelerated strategic decision-making, which in turn leads to higher profitability. A common vulnerability in this type of causal claim is that an alternative factor—such as the massive financial savings from eliminating middle managers' salaries—might actually be responsible for the increased profit. The correct answer strengthens the argument by isolating the proposed mechanism. By demonstrating that flat organizations that failed to accelerate their decision-making (due to rigorous review protocols) did not see the profit increase, it effectively rules out salary savings as the primary cause and confirms that the pace of decision-making is the true driver of the increased profitability.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's core causal claim.
The sociologist argues that a flat organizational structure causes higher profits specifically because it accelerates strategic decision-making.
Understanding the exact mechanism proposed is essential for strengthening the argument.
2
Anticipate potential weaknesses or alternative explanations in the causal chain.
The increased profit might simply be the result of saving money by not paying middle managers' salaries, rather than the speed of decision-making.
A strong strengthener often eliminates a plausible alternative explanation.
3
Evaluate the options to find one that supports the specific mechanism.
The correct option shows that when the proposed mechanism (accelerated decision-making) is blocked by bureaucratic protocols, the effect (higher profits) disappears.
This confirms that the speed of decision-making, not just salary savings, is the crucial factor driving profitability.

Anahtar Kavram

Causal Reasoning and Isolating Mechanisms
Tahmini Süre:1m 45s
Soru 62Soru →

Paleoecologist: Fossilized molars of late Pleistocene steppe bison reveal a pronounced decrease in microscopic enamel striations beginning roughly 20,000 years ago. Because abrasive silica phytoliths in steppe grasses cause heavy tooth wear, some researchers concluded that a severe drought forced the bison to alter their diet from rough grasses to softer shrubs. However, soil isotope samples from that period establish that grass abundance did not decline. Therefore, the decrease in striations was instead caused by deeper winter snowpack, which prevented the bison from grazing down to the soil-covered bases of the grass stems where gritty mineral dust accumulates.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the paleoecologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Contemporary bison grazing in areas with deep winter snowpack feed almost exclusively on the exposed upper blades of grasses and exhibit significantly less tooth enamel wear than bison grazing on the same grasses in snow-free areas.

Cevap

The argument is most strengthened by the finding that contemporary bison in deep snowpack feed only on upper grass blades and show significantly less tooth wear than bison eating identical grasses in snow-free areas.
The correct answer provides direct empirical support for the author's causal model by showing that when bison graze under deep snowpack, their feeding is restricted to the upper parts of the plants and results in significantly less tooth wear than when grazing on the same grasses without snow. This verifies that snowpack can indeed produce the reduction in striations observed in the fossil record.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the stimulus structure and identify the conclusion and evidence.
The author concludes that reduced dental striations were caused by deep snowpack preventing bison from eating gritty, soil-covered stem bases, relying on evidence that grasses remained abundant despite a drop in wear.
Isolating the specific causal hypothesis is required to determine what evidence would substantiate it.
2
Identify the unstated assumption and logical gap in the causal claim.
The argument assumes that grazing restricted to upper grass blades due to snow cover actually leads to a measurable reduction in dental wear compared to grazing in low-snow conditions.
Strengthening an argument requires finding a claim that validates the causal mechanism or rules out confounding factors.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find the statement that substantiates this causal connection.
Evidence demonstrating that modern bison under similar deep-snow conditions exhibit less enamel wear on identical grasses directly confirms the proposed causal mechanism.
Showing that the hypothesized cause produces the observed effect in an analogous modern setting provides strong supportive evidence.

Anahtar Kavram

Validating a causal mechanism by demonstrating that the cause produces the observed effect under analogous conditions
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 63Soru →

Consider the following argument:

Agronomist: The widespread adoption of genetically modified (GM) pest-resistant cotton in Region X has led to a significant decrease in the use of broad-spectrum chemical pesticides. Environmentalists claim that this reduction in pesticide use has allowed populations of beneficial predatory insects, which naturally control secondary pests like aphids, to rebound. However, the recent explosion of the aphid population in Region X's cotton fields demonstrates that the environmentalists' claim is incorrect.

The supplementary statement 'The genetically modified cotton cultivated in Region X produces a unique metabolic byproduct that makes aphids highly toxic to beneficial predatory insects' strengthens the agronomist's argument.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The correct answer is False because the supplementary statement actually weakens the agronomist's argument. The agronomist argues that the aphid explosion proves predatory insects did not rebound. However, if the aphids have become toxic to the predators due to the GM cotton, the aphid population would explode even if the predator populations had fully rebounded. By providing an alternative explanation for the aphid explosion that is consistent with the environmentalists' claim, the statement undermines the agronomist's logic rather than strengthening it.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and the main premise of the agronomist's argument.
Conclusion: The environmentalists' claim (that predatory insects have rebounded) is incorrect. Premise: There has been a recent explosion of the aphid population.
Deconstructing the argument into its core components is essential before evaluating how new evidence affects the reasoning.
2
Determine the unstated assumption bridging the premise and conclusion.
The agronomist assumes that an aphid explosion is mutually exclusive with a rebound of predatory insects; essentially, if the predators had rebounded, they would have prevented the aphid explosion.
Identifying the unstated assumption reveals the vulnerability in the argument's logic, which is the target for strengthening or weakening.
3
Analyze the supplementary statement to determine its impact on the causal relationship.
The statement reveals that aphids feeding on the GM cotton become toxic to the predatory insects.
Understanding the mechanism introduced by the new evidence is required to see how it interacts with the original argument.
4
Evaluate whether the new evidence strengthens or weakens the agronomist's conclusion.
If aphids are toxic to predators, the aphids would multiply uncontrollably even if predator populations had fully rebounded. This provides an alternative explanation for the aphid explosion that is entirely consistent with the environmentalists' claim, thus severely weakening the agronomist's argument.
Because the statement weakens the argument rather than strengthening it, the claim in the stem is false.

Anahtar Kavram

Differentiating between explaining a premise and strengthening an argument's causal reasoning.
Soru 64Soru →

Neurobiologist: In a recent experiment, macaques performing tasks that required balancing potential risks against potential rewards exhibited elevated activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). When administered a targeted pharmacological agent that temporarily suppressed ACC activity, these macaques consistently chose low-risk, low-reward options, whereas a control group maintained a preference for high-risk, high-reward options. Thus, elevated ACC activity is a necessary neurobiological condition for macaques to favorably assess high-risk alternatives.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the neurobiologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: When presented with choices that carried identical, minimal risks, macaques administered the pharmacological agent demonstrated the same strong preference for high-reward options as the control group.

Cevap

When presented with choices that carried identical, minimal risks, macaques administered the pharmacological agent demonstrated the same strong preference for high-reward options as the control group.
The neurobiologist concludes that ACC activity is necessary specifically for the favorable assessment of high-risk alternatives. However, the experimental evidence only shows that suppressing the ACC stops macaques from choosing high-risk, high-reward options over low-risk, low-reward ones. A critical alternative explanation is that suppressing the ACC simply diminishes their desire for high rewards (making them not care enough to try). The correct answer eliminates this alternative explanation by demonstrating that when risk is held constant, the drug does not affect their strong preference for high rewards. By isolating the drug's effect to the risk variable, it strongly supports the causal connection drawn in the conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion of the argument.
Elevated ACC activity is necessary for macaques to favorably assess high-risk alternatives.
To know what specific claim needs to be strengthened.
2
Identify the premises supporting the conclusion.
Macaques making risk/reward choices have high ACC activity. Suppressing ACC activity causes them to abandon high-risk, high-reward options in favor of low-risk, low-reward ones.
To understand the causal evidence provided by the experiment.
3
Spot the potential gap or alternative explanation in the causal reasoning.
The pharmacological suppression might have caused the macaques to stop caring about the 'high-reward' aspect rather than specifically impairing their assessment of the 'high-risk' aspect.
Strengthen questions involving causal experiments often require eliminating prominent alternative explanations.
4
Evaluate the options to find one that eliminates this alternative explanation.
The correct option shows that when risk is equal and minimal, the drug-affected macaques still actively seek high rewards.
This isolates the drug's behavioral effect purely to the risk assessment, thereby directly strengthening the conclusion that ACC activity relates specifically to assessing risk.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating alternative explanations in causal reasoning
Soru 65Soru →

Below are four distinct causal claims along with their supporting evidence. Pair each claim with the abstract methodological finding that best resolves its primary logical gap.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

An observational survey revealed that individuals who frequently consume Vitamin Z supplements experience significantly lower rates of joint inflammation. Researchers conclude that Vitamin Z actively suppresses inflammatory responses.
Following a municipal ban on restaurant use of artificial trans fats, local cardiovascular emergencies dropped by 15 percent in a single year. Officials assert that the regulatory ban directly caused this rapid decline.
Asthma patients who began using a newly designed ionic air purifier in their bedrooms reported a drastic reduction in symptoms after two months. The manufacturer asserts the device's novel filtration technology is responsible for the relief.
Mice fed a diet exclusively consisting of a specific fermented grain lived 20 percent longer than mice fed a standard diet. Scientists hypothesize that the unique byproducts of the fermentation process are responsible for extending their lifespans.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The observational study (Vitamin Z) matches the finding about exacerbating baseline traits. The municipal ban matches the finding about comparable populations. The air purifier matches the finding about the inert device. The fermented grain matches the finding about the unmodified primary material.
Each correct match directly seals the unique logical vulnerability inherent in its corresponding causal argument. The observational study is strengthened by showing the correlation holds despite opposing confounders. The policy argument is strengthened by using neighboring regions as a control to rule out broader trends. The device argument is strengthened by ruling out the placebo effect via an inert replica. The biological experiment is strengthened by testing the base material to isolate the specific modification.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the observational study argument (Vitamin Z) to identify its causal gap.
The argument infers causation from correlation. A primary vulnerability is confounding variables (e.g., supplement users might generally have healthier lifestyles).
Identifying the specific flaw is required to find the statement that resolves it.
2
Identify the strengthening statement for the Vitamin Z argument.
The statement showing that the group possessed baseline traits that typically exacerbate the condition strengthens the argument.
This rules out positive confounding variables and highlights the efficacy of the vitamin, as it worked despite negative lifestyle factors.
3
Analyze the municipal ban argument to identify its causal gap.
The argument assumes a sequential relationship (ban, then drop in emergencies) is causal. It is vulnerable to concurrent historical trends (e.g., general medical advancements).
Understanding 'post hoc ergo propter hoc' vulnerabilities is key to policy analysis.
4
Identify the strengthening statement for the municipal ban argument.
The statement showing comparable populations without the intervention did not see the reduction addresses this gap.
It acts as a natural control group, ruling out broader concurrent trends as the cause.
5
Analyze the air purifier argument to identify its causal gap.
The argument relies on self-reported symptom reduction after using a new device, which is highly susceptible to the placebo effect.
Any visible intervention can cause perceived psychological and physiological relief.
6
Identify the strengthening statement for the air purifier argument.
The statement regarding an inert but physically identical device addresses this gap.
It effectively creates a blind control group, isolating the device's actual technology from the placebo effect.
7
Analyze the fermented grain argument to identify its causal gap.
The scientists attribute the benefit specifically to the fermentation process, ignoring the possibility that the base grain itself is the cause.
When a modified material has an effect, one must isolate the modification from the base material.
8
Identify the strengthening statement for the fermented grain argument.
The statement showing that the unmodified primary material did not produce the outcome effectively seals this gap.
It isolates the fermentation process as the true causal variable.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying and sealing specific causal vulnerabilities in logical arguments by mapping concrete scenarios to abstract methodological solutions.
Tahmini Süre:3m 0s
Soru 66Soru →

Evaluate the logical structure of the four arguments provided. For each argument, which abstract supplementary finding most effectively strengthens its reasoning by eliminating a plausible alternative explanation?

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Municipalities that installed high-efficiency lighting grids subsequently recorded a sharp decline in vehicular collisions. Local officials attribute this positive trend entirely to the superior clarity provided by the new lighting technology.
The isolated Vaelic dialects and the distant Olaran tongues share highly irregular verb conjugation patterns. Because ancient texts document merchant caravans traveling between these territories, scholars hypothesize that Vaelic speakers adopted these linguistic traits through those economic interactions.
A major financial firm transitioned its workforce to a truncated weekly schedule, followed shortly by a marked surge in aggregate output. Management concluded that the restorative downtime directly catalyzed these efficiency enhancements.
Barrier reefs in Sector Alpha demonstrated robust regeneration following a severe bleaching event, vastly outpacing reefs in Sector Beta. Since Sector Alpha strictly prohibits commercial trawling, researchers conclude that shielding ecosystems from extraction activities bolsters their capacity to rebound from ecological shocks.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The municipal lighting argument matches the finding about control groups and localized safety measures; the linguistics argument matches the finding about ancestral precursors; the financial firm argument matches the finding about identical technological upgrades; and the coral reef argument matches the finding about the intensity of the environmental catalyst.
Each correct pairing links a specific causal argument to a generalized description of evidence that perfectly eliminates its most threatening rival hypothesis. The lighting argument relies on ruling out other localized safety measures. The linguistics argument relies on ruling out genetic linguistic inheritance. The financial firm argument relies on ruling out technological tools as the primary cause of the efficiency surge. The coral reef argument relies on ruling out the possibility that the protected area simply suffered a lesser initial trauma.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural gap in the municipal lighting argument.
The argument assumes that factors other than the lighting grids (such as better road maintenance or lower speed limits) did not cause the drop in vehicular collisions.
Identifying the unstated assumption is necessary to find the abstract statement that validates it.
2
Identify the abstract strengthening principle for the lighting argument.
The finding that populations lacking the 'primary intervention' but having other 'safety measures' saw no decline in 'negative incidents' precisely matches and addresses this gap.
This rules out alternative causes, effectively isolating the new lighting technology as the true cause.
3
Analyze the structural gap in the linguistics argument.
The argument assumes the shared conjugation patterns were not inherited naturally from a common ancestral mother language.
Common descent is the primary rival hypothesis to cultural transmission via trade.
4
Identify the abstract strengthening principle for the linguistics argument.
The finding that the traits are absent in 'ancestral precursors' eliminates the common descent hypothesis.
Ruling out the most likely alternative evolutionary explanation strengthens the economic interaction hypothesis.
5
Analyze the structural gap in the financial firm argument.
The argument assumes the truncated schedule, rather than concurrent factors like new analytics software, caused the output surge.
Business efficiency claims are often vulnerable to confounding variables occurring simultaneously.
6
Identify the abstract strengthening principle for the financial firm argument.
The finding that peers with 'traditional operational structures' but 'identical technological upgrades' saw stagnant metrics effectively isolates the schedule change.
This comparative analysis proves that secondary innovations alone could not produce the observed effect.
7
Analyze the structural gap in the coral reef argument.
The argument assumes the reefs with the trawling moratorium did not simply experience less severe bleaching conditions to begin with.
Recovery robustness depends heavily on the initial severity of the climate shock.
8
Identify the abstract strengthening principle for the coral reef argument.
The finding demonstrating that the 'environmental catalyst' was actually 'significantly more intense' in the recovering location addresses this directly.
By showing the protected reefs recovered better despite harsher conditions, the protective effect of the trawling ban is powerfully reinforced.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening causal and explanatory arguments by eliminating rival hypotheses and isolating independent variables.
Soru 67Soru →

Consider the following argument:

Linguist: Because the reconstructed Proto-Indo-European (PIE) language lacks a common root word for 'sea' or 'ocean', many scholars have concluded that the original PIE speakers inhabited a completely landlocked region. However, this conclusion is premature. The PIE vocabulary includes several deeply entrenched roots for terms such as 'ship', 'rowing', and 'mast'. Since a culture would not develop a complex maritime vocabulary unless they lived near a large, navigable body of water, the PIE speakers must have originally inhabited a coastal region.

Evaluate the following assertion:

The statement 'Linguistic studies demonstrate that while early coastal populations shared a common terminology for man-made maritime tools, they almost universally utilized highly localized, non-transferable idioms to refer to the ocean itself' significantly strengthens the linguist's argument.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

The assertion is true; the supplementary statement acts as a powerful strengthener for the linguist's argument.
The correct answer is True. The supplementary statement acts as a powerful 'Defender' by explaining away the very evidence the opposing scholars used to argue PIE speakers were landlocked (the lack of a word for 'sea'). By demonstrating that actual coastal populations historically exhibited this exact linguistic paradox—sharing terms for man-made maritime tools but utilizing non-transferable idioms for the ocean itself—the statement perfectly aligns the PIE evidence with the linguist's coastal conclusion, eliminating both the scholars' objection and the alternate 'river/lake' hypothesis.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structure of the linguist's argument.
Premises: PIE has words for ships/masts but lacks a word for sea/ocean. Conclusion: PIE speakers lived in a coastal region. Counter-argument addressed: Critics say no word for 'sea' means they were landlocked.
Identifying the premises, conclusion, and the opposing view is essential to pinpointing the logical vulnerabilities of the argument.
2
Identify the logical gaps and opposing evidence.
Gap 1: 'Navigable water' could mean a large river or lake, not necessarily a coast. Gap 2: The opposing scholars use the lack of an 'ocean' word as direct evidence against the coastal hypothesis, which the linguist dismisses without entirely explaining.
Strengthening statements typically bridge logical leaps or neutralize counter-evidence.
3
Evaluate the effect of the supplementary statement.
The statement reveals that the exact linguistic idiosyncrasy of PIE (having tool words but no shared ocean word) is a definitive, documented trait of early coastal populations.
To determine if the statement strengthens, we must see how it interacts with the identified gaps.
4
Determine the impact on the conclusion.
By neutralizing the critics' evidence (explaining why a coastal group would paradoxically lack a word for ocean) and linking the maritime tool vocabulary directly to coastal populations, the statement strongly supports the linguist's conclusion.
Confirming that the statement achieves the precise goal of a strengthen question.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening by Neutralizing Counter-Evidence (Defender) and Bridging Concept Gaps
Soru 68Soru →

Anthropologist: The earliest known permanent human settlements in the Xylos Valley date to the exact same period as the valley's first evidence of systematic agriculture. Most historians conclude that the advent of agriculture provided a reliable food surplus, enabling formerly nomadic populations to settle. However, paleoclimatological data reveals that immediately prior to this period, a severe climatic shift drastically reduced the migratory range of the valley's primary game animals. Thus, it was likely the geographic confinement of this critical food source, rather than the adoption of agriculture, that primarily precipitated the transition to permanent settlements.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the anthropologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: In neighboring valleys that experienced the identical climatic shift but where the terrain precluded systematic agriculture, contemporaneous nomadic populations also transitioned to permanent settlements.

Cevap

The statement showing that neighboring valleys with the same climate shift but no agriculture also saw populations transition to permanent settlements.
The correct answer utilizes a classic logical reasoning structure to strengthen a causal claim: isolating variables. The stimulus presents a situation with two concurrent potential causes for permanent settlement (agriculture and game confinement). The correct option introduces a parallel scenario (neighboring valleys) where one cause is eliminated (no agriculture) but the other is present (climate shift), and shows that the effect (settlement) still occurred. This strongly implies that the climate shift, not agriculture, was the primary driver of the settlement.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the core argument structure.
Identify the causal dispute: Historians argue Agriculture caused Settlement. The Anthropologist argues Game Confinement (due to Climate Shift) caused Settlement.
Understanding the competing causal claims is necessary to know how to support the author's specific conclusion.
2
Identify the logical gap or vulnerability in the anthropologist's argument.
The anthropologist observes a correlation between the climate shift, agriculture, and settlement. The vulnerability is that agriculture might still be the primary driver, and the climate shift merely a coincidence or a catalyst for agriculture.
To strengthen a causal argument, one must address its vulnerabilities, often by eliminating alternative causes or showing that the cause produces the effect independently.
3
Evaluate the options based on their ability to isolate the anthropologist's hypothesized cause.
The correct option provides a scenario where the competing cause (agriculture) is removed, but the hypothesized cause (climate shift/game confinement) remains, and the effect (settlement) still occurs.
This 'control group' methodology perfectly strengthens the causal relationship claimed by the author by ruling out agriculture as the necessary driving force.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Causal Arguments via Control Scenarios
Soru 69Soru →

Literary Historian: In the nineteenth century, novels serialized in periodicals were substantially longer on average than those published directly as single volumes. Traditional scholarship attributes this discrepancy to financial opportunism, arguing that because authors were compensated by the word, they artificially padded their serialized works with superfluous subplots. This economic explanation, however, fundamentally misunderstands the medium. Serialized novels required readers to wait weeks between installments. To sustain engagement and prevent attrition over these prolonged intervals, authors were structurally compelled to interweave multiple narrative threads and extensive supporting casts. Therefore, the sheer length of serialized novels was a functional byproduct of the medium's temporal constraints, rather than an artifact of payment structures.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the literary historian's conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Nineteenth-century authors who negotiated fixed-sum serialization contracts, receiving a predetermined payment regardless of a manuscript's final word count, produced novels exhibiting the same extensive length and narrative density as those serialized under per-word compensation models.

Cevap

The statement detailing that authors with fixed-sum contracts produced novels of the same extensive length and density as those paid by the word.
The argument involves a dispute over the cause of a phenomenon (the immense length of serialized novels). The historian dismisses a financial motive and posits a narrative motive. The correct answer acts as a perfect scientific control: it introduces a scenario where the financial motive is entirely removed (authors are paid a fixed sum regardless of word count). Because the novels remain just as long in this scenario, the financial motive is definitively ruled out as the primary cause. Eliminating a prominent alternative cause strongly fortifies the author's preferred causal explanation.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the argument's causal structure.
The phenomenon is that serialized novels are longer than single-volume novels. The traditional view claims Cause X (per-word payment) leads to this length. The historian argues Cause Y (temporal constraints requiring complex subplots) leads to this length, not Cause X.
Understanding the competing causal claims is necessary to know what evidence will support the author's specific conclusion over the rival theory.
2
Determine the goal of the question.
Identify a premise that provides the strongest support for the historian's conclusion (Cause Y, not Cause X).
The question stem explicitly asks for the strongest support for the historian's conclusion.
3
Pre-phrase the ideal strengthener.
The best strengthener will either provide direct evidence that temporal constraints necessitated the subplots, or it will sever the link between the per-word payment and the length (e.g., showing length remained long even without per-word payment).
In LSAT causal arguments, eliminating the alternate cause is one of the most effective ways to strengthen a favored causal explanation.
4
Evaluate the options against the pre-phrase.
The correct option explicitly provides a control scenario where Cause X (per-word payment) is eliminated via fixed-sum contracts, yet the phenomenon (extensive length) persists. This proves Cause X is not necessary, leaving Cause Y as the dominant explanation.
This rigorously isolates the variable in dispute, providing structural logical support for the historian.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Alternative Causal Explanations in Arguments
Soru 70Soru →

Astrophysicist: For decades, the erratic dimming of Star X9 was attributed to passing interstellar dust clouds. However, recent observations show that the dimming events actually occur at perfectly regular intervals of exactly 412 days. Interstellar dust clouds vary greatly in density and spatial distribution, which would produce irregular dimming patterns. Therefore, the dimming must be caused by the orbit of a massive, solitary exoplanet blocking the star's light, rather than passing dust clouds.

Evaluate whether the following statement is true or false:
The discovery that a dense, highly structured ring of asteroids orbits Star X9 exactly once every 412 days strengthens the astrophysicist's conclusion.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The new information actually weakens the argument. The author specifically concludes that the dimming must be caused by a massive, solitary exoplanet, based on the regular 412-day cycle. The discovery of a dense asteroid ring orbiting every 412 days introduces a plausible alternative cause for the regular dimming. By providing an alternative explanation that fits the data perfectly, the statement weakens the author's claim that it 'must' be a solitary exoplanet.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is that the dimming must be caused by a massive, solitary exoplanet.
To evaluate if a statement strengthens an argument, you must first precisely define the argument's central claim.
2
Identify the premises supporting the conclusion.
The dimming occurs regularly every 412 days, and interstellar dust would cause irregular dimming.
Understanding the evidence is necessary to see how the author bridges the gap from the data to the conclusion.
3
Evaluate the impact of the new statement on the argument.
The new statement introduces a structured ring of asteroids that also perfectly explains the 412-day regular interval.
New evidence must be integrated with existing premises to determine its logical effect on the conclusion.
4
Determine if the integrated information strengthens or weakens the conclusion.
Because the asteroid ring provides an alternative explanation to the 'massive, solitary exoplanet', it weakens the conclusion that the exoplanet must be the cause.
Evidence that makes an unstated alternative cause plausible fundamentally undermines the author's specific conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying alternative explanations and understanding how introducing a new, viable cause weakens a definitive causal conclusion.
Soru 71Soru →

Below are four distinct arguments (Arguments 1-4), each exhibiting a specific logical gap, along with four abstract descriptions of methods to strengthen an argument. Match each argument to the abstract mechanism that most accurately describes how a valid strengthening premise would operate to resolve its specific structural vulnerability.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Argument 1: A prominent sociological study reveals that municipalities with extensive public park systems boast significantly lower rates of cardiovascular disease among residents. The researchers conclude that regular access to public parks directly improves a population's cardiovascular health.
Argument 2: Extinct dire wolves possessed exceptionally robust jawbones, structurally similar to those of modern spotted hyenas. Because spotted hyenas utilize their robust jaws primarily to crack large bones to extract marrow, paleontologists conclude that dire wolves also regularly engaged in bone-cracking behavior.
Argument 3: A recent survey of executives attending a premier summit on artificial intelligence found that 90% expect AI to render their current business models obsolete within a decade. Therefore, it is evident that the global business community overwhelmingly anticipates near-term, catastrophic AI-driven disruption.
Argument 4: Following the implementation of a rigorous new standardized curriculum in Province Y, high school graduation rates rose by 15% over a five-year period. The provincial educational board claims that the new curriculum is solely responsible for this marked improvement in graduation rates.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Argument 1 matches with undermining reverse causation; Argument 2 matches with fortifying an analogy; Argument 3 matches with addressing selection bias; Argument 4 matches with demonstrating effect absence without the cause.
Each argument exhibits a classic LSAT logical flaw that requires a specific structural fix. Argument 1 confuses correlation with causation and is vulnerable to reverse causality, which is resolved by ruling out that the effect preceded the cause. Argument 2 relies on an analogy that is fortified by eliminating alternative explanations for the shared trait. Argument 3 uses an unrepresentative sample, requiring validation that the bias does not distort the conclusion. Argument 4 assumes a temporal sequence implies causation, which is best strengthened by showing that the effect does not occur when the cause is absent, acting as a control group.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the logical gap in Argument 1 (Correlation vs. Causation).
Identified that the argument is vulnerable to reverse causality, leading to the selection of the mechanism that explicitly undermines the possibility that the effect preceded the cause.
Observational correlations are often flawed because the causal arrow could point in the opposite direction.
2
Analyze the logical gap in Argument 2 (Faulty Analogy).
Identified that shared physical traits do not guarantee shared behavior, leading to the selection of the mechanism that provides corroborative empirical data to close the analogical gap.
Analogies require supplementary evidence to prove that the compared elements function identically in the specific context.
3
Analyze the logical gap in Argument 3 (Unrepresentative Sample).
Identified a massive selection bias in surveying AI summit attendees to represent the whole business community, leading to the selection of the mechanism that validates the generalization.
Generalizations drawn from specific subsets must be defended against accusations of sample bias.
4
Analyze the logical gap in Argument 4 (Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc).
Identified the assumption that temporal sequence equals causation, leading to the selection of the mechanism that uses control group logic to isolate the curriculum as the true cause.
Temporal claims must rule out alternative events that occurred simultaneously.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying structural vulnerabilities in distinct types of logical arguments (Causal, Analogical, Sampling, and Temporal) and determining their abstract strengthening mechanisms.
Tahmini Süre:3m 0s
Soru 72Soru →

Sociologist: Over the past fifteen years, the average time citizens spend reading books has dropped dramatically, yet the national average score on the standardized Literacy Competency Exam (LCE) has remained perfectly stable. Technology advocates argue this stability demonstrates that frequent engagement with modern, text-heavy digital media provides the same literacy benefits as reading traditional books. This conclusion is fundamentally flawed. The stability in the average LCE score is solely due to the exceptionally high scores of the oldest demographic cohorts, who acquired their literacy skills prior to the digital age. Therefore, frequent engagement with digital media is not merely an inadequate substitute for books, but actually detrimental to an individual's literacy.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the sociologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Among individuals who spend an equally minimal amount of time reading traditional books, those who frequently engage with digital media score substantially lower on the LCE than those who rarely use digital media.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that among individuals who rarely read books, those who frequently engage with digital media score substantially lower than those who rarely use digital media.
The argument concludes that digital media is actively 'detrimental' to literacy, rather than just being an 'inadequate substitute' for books. This is a massive logical leap. Even if younger people are reading fewer books and scoring lower, their lower scores might solely be due to the lack of books, meaning digital media is just neutral. The correct answer strengthens the argument by isolating digital media as a variable: it compares two groups who both lack book reading, and shows that adding digital media makes scores worse. This proves digital media actively harms literacy.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is that 'frequent engagement with digital media is not merely an inadequate substitute for books, but actually detrimental to an individual's literacy.'
This is the final causal claim the sociologist makes in opposition to the technology advocates.
2
Analyze the premises and identify the logical gap.
The premises state that younger people's lower scores are masked by older people's high scores. The gap is the assumption that the younger generation's lower scores are actively caused by digital media (a detriment), rather than simply caused by their lack of book reading (a missing benefit).
To strengthen the argument, the correct answer must provide evidence that digital media causes active harm, independent of the harm caused by simply not reading.
3
Evaluate the options for one that isolates the causal variable.
The correct option compares two groups that BOTH read very few books. Because the group that uses digital media scores worse than the group that does not, digital media is proven to exert an active detrimental effect.
This bridges the exact logical gap, elevating digital media from an 'inadequate substitute' to an 'active detriment.'

Anahtar Kavram

Causal Isolation and Alternative Explanations
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 73Soru →

Marine Biologist: For decades, scientists assumed that the intense bioluminescence of phytoplankton in the Vespera Sea during the summer was simply a physiological byproduct of nutrient-rich deep-ocean upwellings. However, new data reveals that nutrient levels in the Vespera Sea are actually significantly lower in the summer than in the spring, a season when phytoplankton exhibit almost no bioluminescence. Therefore, the summer bioluminescence must be an evolved defensive adaptation against the predatory zooplankton that migrate into the sea during the summer, as these specific predators are known to avoid bright light.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the marine biologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The species of predatory zooplankton that inhabit the Vespera Sea during the spring months are actively attracted to light sources.

Cevap

The statement that spring zooplankton are actively attracted to light sources.
The argument concludes that summer bioluminescence is an evolved defense against light-avoiding predators. A major vulnerability in this argument is the question of why the phytoplankton do not simply glow year-round. The correct answer resolves this by demonstrating an evolutionary pressure *against* glowing in the spring (spring predators are attracted to light). By proving that the bioluminescence precisely matches the specific, alternating threats of different seasons, this answer eliminates the possibility that the glowing is merely a random occurrence, thereby massively strengthening the adaptation theory.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the core argument and identify the conclusion.
Conclusion: Summer bioluminescence is a defensive adaptation against light-avoiding summer zooplankton.
To know what needs to be strengthened, the exact causal claim must be isolated.
2
Identify the premises and the logical gap in the reasoning.
Premise: Summer nutrients are lower than spring nutrients, yet phytoplankton only glow in summer. Gap: The biologist assumes the glow is specifically tailored to the summer predator, without fully accounting for why the phytoplankton don't just glow year-round if it's generally useful.
Understanding what the argument leaves unaddressed reveals the most effective way to strengthen it.
3
Evaluate the options to find one that bridges the gap or rules out an alternative explanation.
The option stating spring zooplankton are attracted to light explains why the phytoplankton actively suppress or lack bioluminescence in the spring.
If bioluminescence would get them eaten in the spring, it proves the behavior is a highly specific evolutionary response to seasonal predatory habits, thereby strongly confirming the biologist's adaptation hypothesis.

Anahtar Kavram

Causal Reasoning and Ruling Out Alternatives in Evolutionary Arguments
Soru 74Soru →

Archaeologist: The sudden abandonment of the Xionian urban centers around 1200 BCE is traditionally attributed to a severe regional drought that devastated crop yields. However, recent excavations reveal that the cities' massive grain silos were entirely full when the population fled. Furthermore, isotopic analysis of skeletal remains from that period shows no evidence of nutritional stress. Since the population was clearly not starving, the civilization's collapse must have been precipitated by a sudden military invasion rather than by environmental factors.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the archaeologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Geological surveys indicate that the Xionian cities were built directly above massive, easily accessible freshwater aquifers that were immune to surface drought conditions.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that Xionian cities were built above massive freshwater aquifers immune to drought conditions.
The author concludes that environmental factors did not cause the collapse solely because there was no evidence of starvation. However, a drought could easily precipitate a collapse through water scarcity (dehydration) rather than food scarcity, which would still leave the grain silos full. This correct answer explicitly rules out the possibility of a water shortage by establishing that the cities had access to immune freshwater aquifers. By eliminating the most plausible alternative environmental threat, it significantly strengthens the conclusion that the collapse was due to non-environmental reasons, such as a military invasion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the argument's structure to isolate the premises and the main conclusion.
Conclusion: A sudden military invasion, not environmental factors, caused the collapse. Premises: The grain silos were full, and skeletons showed no nutritional stress.
Identifying the exact boundaries of the author's claim is required to find where the logic is vulnerable.
2
Identify the logical gap or unstated assumption made by the author.
The author falsely equates 'no starvation' with 'no environmental factors.' A severe drought creates two distinct environmental threats: lack of food and lack of water.
To strengthen an argument, you must usually find an option that patches a vulnerability or rules out an alternate explanation.
3
Evaluate the options to find one that bridges the identified gap.
The option regarding freshwater aquifers explicitly eliminates the possibility of dehydration (water scarcity).
Ruling out the most prominent remaining alternative explanation (thirst) forces the conclusion toward the author's preferred explanation (military invasion).

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening causal arguments by eliminating alternative explanations.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 75Soru →

Consider the following argument:

Media Scholar: It is widely argued that the mass production of political pamphlets was the primary catalyst for the rapid spread of democratic ideals among the European working class during the 18th century. However, historical records confirm that the literacy rate among this demographic at the time remained firmly below 15 percent. Since the vast majority of these individuals could not read, the diffusion of these revolutionary ideals must have been driven almost entirely by traditional oral communication in public gathering places, functioning completely independent of the printed word.

The media scholar's argument is logically strengthened by newly uncovered historical accounts indicating that 18th-century political pamphlets were regularly read aloud by literate community members to large audiences of illiterate workers in local taverns.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The statement is False because the historical accounts actually weaken the media scholar's argument. The scholar concludes that the spread of ideals functioned 'completely independent of the printed word.' However, the accounts reveal that the oral communication was, in fact, directly reliant on the printed pamphlets. This undermines the scholar's attempt to sever the causal link between the mass production of pamphlets and the spread of democratic ideals.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion of the media scholar's argument.
The conclusion is that the diffusion of democratic ideals was driven by oral communication and functioned completely independent of the printed word.
Understanding the exact scope of the conclusion is necessary to determine what evidence would strengthen or weaken it.
2
Analyze the new evidence provided in the statement.
The evidence states that printed political pamphlets were read aloud to illiterate workers by literate community members.
We must determine how this specific piece of information interacts with the established premises and conclusion.
3
Evaluate the logical impact of the new evidence on the argument.
While the evidence confirms an oral medium was used, it establishes that this oral communication was directly dependent on the printed pamphlets. This contradicts the 'completely independent of the printed word' clause of the conclusion.
Evidence that contradicts a core, explicit component of the conclusion weakens the argument, rather than strengthening it.
4
Determine the truth value of the provided statement.
Since the new evidence weakens the argument, the statement claiming that it strengthens the argument is False.
This directly answers the prompt's evaluation criteria.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating how new evidence affects an argument by distinguishing between superficial support for a premise and contradiction of a core conclusion.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
ÖncekiSayfa 4 / 4
Strengthen Alıştırma Soruları — LSAT — Sayfa 4 | Examkin