During an interdisciplinary case review, the healthcare team evaluates several clients exhibiting challenging behaviors on a medical unit. According to regulatory standards and safety guidelines, for which client is the application of physical restraints clinically justified?
- AA client with advanced Alzheimer's disease who paces the hallways and frequently wanders into the rooms of other hospitalized individuals
- BA client whose assigned unlicensed assistive personnel (UAP) independently determines that wrist restraints are necessary to safely complete a bed bath
- A client with metabolic encephalopathy who persistently attempts to remove a life-sustaining chest tube despite continuous reorientation and a trial of alternative sensory itemsCevap
- DA client with a history of recurrent falls who continuously attempts to climb out of bed unassisted to use the restroom
Cevap
A client with metabolic encephalopathy who persistently attempts to remove a life-sustaining chest tube despite continuous reorientation and a trial of alternative sensory items
The correct answer identifies that physical restraints are only legally and clinically appropriate when they are necessary to prevent the disruption of life-sustaining medical therapy, and only after less restrictive measures have been attempted and documented. The client with metabolic encephalopathy pulling at a chest tube meets these strict criteria.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Physical restraints are an intervention of last resort, justified only to prevent immediate physical harm to the client (such as pulling out life-sustaining equipment) after less restrictive alternatives have failed, and cannot be used for fall prevention or staff convenience.