Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaCross-Text Connections: Relational Synthesis

Text 1
Environmental economist Dr. Aris Thorne argues that product eco-labels are highly effective tools for reducing carbon emissions. Thorne points to survey data indicating that over 70% of shoppers express a strong preference for brands displaying third-party environmental certifications. Consequently, Thorne maintains that widespread eco-label adoption directly shifts market share toward sustainable manufacturers by altering consumer purchasing habits.

Text 2
Marketing researcher Dr. Maya Lin investigated real-world purchasing behavior in retail environments. Lin’s team tracked consumers who had previously expressed green preferences in surveys. When faced with actual choices on supermarket shelves, however, these consumers consistently prioritized price and brand familiarity over eco-labels. This discrepancy indicates that survey-stated intentions do not reliably predict actual buying decisions under normal market conditions.

Based on the two texts, match each claim or assumption from Text 1 with its corresponding counterargument or empirical finding from Text 2.

  • Survey data showing shopper preference for environmental certificationsObservation that stated intentions do not reliably predict actual consumer decisions
  • The expectation that eco-labels alter consumer purchasing habitsEvidence that consumers prioritize price and familiarity when selecting products
  • The projected outcome of market share shifting toward sustainable manufacturersFinding that sustainable product sales did not show a significant increase

Cevap

Survey preference matches the observation that stated intentions are unreliable; expectation of altered habits matches the evidence that consumers prioritize price and brand familiarity; and the projected market shift matches the finding that sustainable product sales did not increase.
The correct matches pair Thorne's theoretical assumptions about eco-labels with Lin's empirical observations of consumer behavior in real supermarkets. Thorne's reliance on surveys is qualified by the finding that surveys do not predict behavior; Thorne's belief that labels alter shopping habits is countered by the evidence that consumers prioritize price and familiarity; and Thorne's prediction of a market share shift is contradicted by the lack of sales growth.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Text 1 to identify Thorne's claims regarding eco-labels.
Thorne asserts that shoppers prefer eco-labels in surveys (Claim 1), that these labels alter purchasing habits (Claim 2), and that this shifts market share toward sustainable brands (Claim 3).
Establishing the core arguments of the first text is necessary before comparing them to the second text.
2
Analyze Text 2 to identify Lin's empirical findings regarding shopper behavior.
Lin finds that shoppers prioritize price/familiarity over eco-labels (Finding A), survey-stated intentions do not predict decisions (Finding B), and sustainable product sales did not increase (Finding C).
Understanding the second author's findings allows for relational synthesis with the first author's arguments.
3
Synthesize the relationships to pair the claims with their specific counterarguments.
Match Claim 1 (survey preference) with Finding B (survey unreliability); match Claim 2 (altered habits) with Finding A (price/brand priority); match Claim 3 (shifted market share) with Finding C (no sales increase).
Directly links each theoretical claim with its corresponding real-world limitation or disproving evidence.

Anahtar Kavram

Synthesizing relational connections between two texts by pairing theoretical claims with empirical counter-evidence.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Cross-Text Connections: Relational Synthesis

Bu konudan daha fazla soru