Text 1
Archaeologist Iégor Reznikoff argues that the placement of Upper Paleolithic cave art was deliberately determined by the acoustic properties of the cave chambers. Reznikoff posits that prehistoric artists navigated pitch-black cave networks by using vocal hums to locate areas with high acoustic resonance. Once a resonant chamber was identified, they marked it with paintings, suggesting that sound played a central role in ritualistic art creation.
Text 2
Researcher Amanda Ruiz and colleagues investigated Reznikoff’s hypothesis by measuring the acoustic properties of several French caves containing Upper Paleolithic artwork. While Ruiz’s team confirmed that many chambers featuring cave paintings indeed exhibited high acoustic resonance, they also discovered numerous highly resonant chambers that lacked any art. Ruiz concludes that resonance alone cannot account for the placement of cave paintings, as other factors must have influenced prehistoric site selection.
Based on the passages, how would Ruiz and colleagues (Text 2) most likely characterize Reznikoff’s hypothesis (Text 1)?
- AAs entirely refuted by their findings that chambers with cave paintings do not exhibit high acoustic resonance.
- As partially consistent with their measurements of decorated chambers but insufficient on its own to explain prehistoric site selection.Cevap
- CAs a hypothesis that is highly plausible but cannot be tested without reproducing the specific vocal hums of prehistoric artists.
- DAs a compelling explanation that is supported by the fact that prehistoric artists used paint pigments to enhance the resonance of cave walls.