A commercial printing technician reviewing confidential financial documents reads about an unannounced merger involving a publicly traded corporation. The technician informs a neighbor about the upcoming merger, and the neighbor buys shares of the target company before the public announcement. Which of the following statements correctly describes the insider trading liability in this scenario?
- Both the technician (as tipper) and the neighbor (as tippee) can be held liable for insider trading.Cevap
- BOnly the technician can be held liable because the neighbor is not an employee or corporate insider of the issuer.
- COnly the neighbor can be held liable because the technician did not personally execute any securities trades.
- DNeither party can be held liable because the technician was employed by an outside vendor rather than the issuing corporation.
Cevap
Both the technician (as tipper) and the neighbor (as tippee) can be held liable for insider trading.
Under federal securities laws and the Insider Trading Sanctions rules, insider trading liability extends to both the person who discloses material nonpublic information in breach of a duty (the tipper) and the person who receives and trades on that information (the tippee). The tipper does not need to trade personally, and the tippee does not need to be a corporate employee to be held liable.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Tipper and Tippee Liability under Insider Trading Law