An independent catering manager serving a private executive lunch at a publicly traded software company overhears the board of directors approving an unannounced tender offer to acquire a major competitor. The catering manager relays this information to a personal friend, who immediately purchases call options on the target company's stock prior to the public announcement. Under federal securities laws, which of the following statements accurately describes the insider trading liability in this scenario?
- Both the catering manager and the friend can be held liable for insider trading.Cevap
- BOnly the friend can be held liable because insider trading violations require an actual securities trade to occur.
- COnly the catering manager can be held liable because external tippees who are not corporate employees are exempt from federal insider trading rules.
- DNeither individual can be held liable because the information was obtained by an outside service vendor rather than a corporate officer.
Cevap
Both the catering manager and the friend can be held liable for insider trading.
Under federal insider trading regulations and the misappropriation theory, liability extends to both tippers and tippees. The tipper breaches a duty of trust by revealing material nonpublic information, and the tippee assumes liability by executing trades while knowing or having reason to know that the information was improperly disclosed.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Tipper and Tippee Liability under Insider Trading Regulations