Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaInsider Trading and Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information

An independent environmental consultant retained by a publicly traded energy company reviews confidential soil analysis indicating an unannounced major mineral discovery. The consultant discloses this information to a personal friend, who immediately purchases call options on the company's stock and earns a substantial profit. The consultant receives no monetary compensation from the friend and executes no trades. Under federal securities laws, which of the following statements regarding insider trading liability is correct?

  1. Both the consultant and the friend can be held liable under insider trading laws, as liability applies to both the tipper who breaches a duty by sharing material nonpublic information and the tippee who trades on it.Cevap
  2. B
    Only the friend is liable because insider trading violations require an actual purchase or sale of securities by the person possessing the confidential information.
  3. C
    Only the consultant is liable because tippees who are not employees or directors of the issuing corporation are exempt from federal insider trading prosecution.
  4. D
    Neither individual is liable because external consultants and their personal acquaintances owe no fiduciary duties to the energy company's shareholders.

Cevap

Both the consultant and the friend can be held liable under insider trading laws, as liability applies to both the tipper who breaches a duty by sharing material nonpublic information and the tippee who trades on it.
Under federal securities laws regarding insider trading, both the tipper and the tippee are subject to civil and criminal liability. The consultant acted as a temporary insider and breached a fiduciary duty of confidentiality by conveying material nonpublic information. The friend is liable as a tippee because the friend knowingly acted upon improperly disclosed nonpublic information by purchasing securities.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine if the information constitutes material nonpublic information.
The unannounced major mineral discovery is material because it would significantly affect an investor's decision, and it has not been disclosed to the public.
Establishing material nonpublic status is the fundamental prerequisite for an insider trading violation.
2
Assess the tipper's status and obligation.
The consultant is a temporary insider bound by confidentiality, and sharing confidential findings with a third party constitutes a breach of duty.
A tipper is liable when disclosing material nonpublic information in violation of a duty of trust and confidence.
3
Assess the tippee's liability upon trading.
The friend who received the confidential information and executed trades on call options incurs tippee liability.
Tippees inherit the duty and face liability when they trade on information they know or should know was provided through a breach of confidentiality.

Anahtar Kavram

Tipper and Tippee Liability under Federal Securities Laws
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Insider Trading and Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information