Examkin

Tüm alıştırma soruları

2343 soru

Tüm türler2,343Çoktan seçmeli1,205Çoklu seçim414Doğru / Yanlış105Sayısal107Eşleştirme467Sıralama45
Soru 2341Soru →

On Thursday, August 6, a retail customer places an order with a broker-dealer to buy 100100 shares of common stock. The firm fills the order by executing it on an exchange on behalf of the customer rather than filling it from its own trading inventory. Under SEC and FINRA rules, which of the following correctly identifies the required regular-way settlement date and the firm capacity disclosure on the customer's trade confirmation?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Settlement occurs on Friday, August 7 (T+1), and the confirmation must state that the firm acted as an agent and disclose the commission.

Cevap

Settlement occurs on Friday, August 7 (T+1), and the confirmation must state that the firm acted as an agent and disclose the commission.
Regular-way settlement for US equity securities occurs on T+1, which is one business day following the trade date (Friday, August 7 for a Thursday trade). Furthermore, because the firm executed the order on behalf of the customer on an exchange rather than trading from its proprietary account, the broker-dealer operated in an agency capacity and is required to disclose its capacity as an agent along with the commission charged on the customer trade confirmation.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine the regular-way settlement date for common stock.
Under SEC Rule 15c6-1 (effective May 2024 and in 2026), regular-way settlement for equity securities is T+1 (one business day after trade date).
Since the trade date is Thursday, August 6, adding one business day results in Friday, August 7.
2
Identify the broker-dealer capacity.
The firm executed the transaction on an exchange on behalf of the client rather than trading out of inventory, which means it acted as a broker (agent).
When a firm acts in an agency capacity, FINRA and SEC trade confirmation rules require disclosing the agency capacity and the exact commission amount.

Anahtar Kavram

T+1 regular-way settlement cycle and trade confirmation capacity disclosures for broker-dealers.
Soru 2342Soru →

A compliance auditor is reviewing trading activity logs at a member broker-dealer to evaluate potential regulatory violations. Which of the following trading practices represent prohibited market manipulation or fraudulent conduct? (Select all that apply.)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Entering non-bonafide buy orders with the intent to cancel them prior to execution to create a false impression of buying interest in a security.; Purchasing equity shares for a firm's proprietary account immediately prior to executing a large customer block buy order in the same stock.

Cevap

The prohibited practices are entering non-bonafide orders intended for cancellation before execution (spoofing) and buying shares ahead of a client's block buy order (front-running).
Entering non-bonafide orders designed to be canceled before execution (spoofing) deceives market participants regarding genuine interest. Purchasing securities ahead of a client's institutional block order (front-running) takes unfair advantage of pending client orders. Both activities constitute illegal market manipulation and fraud.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze each trading activity to identify deceptive actions designed to mislead the market or exploit material non-public order information.
Entering fake orders to fabricate market depth (spoofing) and trading ahead of client block transactions (front-running) violate federal securities laws and FINRA ethical standards.
Both activities exploit order flow and artificially affect security prices to the detriment of public investors.
2
Differentiate lawful broker agency operations and SRO jurisdiction limits from manipulative trading.
Matching buyers and sellers for a commission is standard agency execution. SROs enforce membership rules through fines and suspensions, not criminal prosecution.
Standard agency transactions are legal, and criminal sanctions fall strictly under governmental jurisdiction.

Anahtar Kavram

Prohibited Market Manipulation and Fraudulent Practices
Soru 2343Soru →

A registered representative associated with a FINRA-member broker-dealer who is not designated as a Municipal Finance Professional (MFP) is reviewing regulatory compliance rules for several planned personal and professional activities. The representative intends to: host an institutional client at a professional athletic event (attending together), take a compensated evening teaching job at a local community college, send a customary wedding gift to a client paid entirely from personal funds, and make a $500 personal political contribution to a mayoral candidate outside their voting district. Which of the following statements regarding the regulatory requirements governing these proposed actions are correct?

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The representative must provide prior written notification to their member firm before engaging in the compensated outside teaching role.; A personal wedding gift provided to a client, which is customary and funded entirely from the representative's personal assets, is exempt from the $100 annual gift limit.

Cevap

The statement requiring prior written notification to the firm for compensated outside employment and the statement exempting personal, customary wedding gifts from the $100 gift cap are correct.
Under FINRA Rule 3270, associated persons must provide prior written notice to their member firm before receiving compensation from any business activity outside the firm, such as an adjunct teaching role. Additionally, FINRA Rule 3220 guidance exempts customary personal gifts (such as wedding or baby gifts) from the $100 annual limit provided they are personal in nature and funded entirely by the representative without firm reimbursement.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Outside Business Activity (OBA) requirements under FINRA Rule 3270.
Any compensated business activity outside the scope of the employment relationship with the member firm requires prior written notice to the firm.
Ensures the firm can evaluate potential conflicts of interest before the activity occurs.
2
Evaluate business entertainment vs. gift rules under FINRA Rule 3220.
Attending a sports event alongside the client classifies the expense as business entertainment rather than a gift subject to the $100 annual cap.
Gifts are un-hosted items or events given to customers; hosted events fall under business entertainment guidelines.
3
Evaluate personal gift exceptions under FINRA Rule 3220.
Gifts given for major personal events (e.g., weddings, births) that are customary and paid for entirely out of personal funds are exempt.
The rule is designed to prevent improper business influence, not to restrict legitimate personal relationships.
4
Evaluate MSRB Rule G-37 applicability.
A non-MFP registered representative making a political contribution does not trigger the two-year prohibition on municipal securities business under Rule G-37.
Pay-to-play prohibitions strictly apply to Municipal Finance Professionals (MFPs), municipal broker-dealers, and political action committees (PACs).

Anahtar Kavram

Regulatory distinctions across FINRA Rule 3220 (Gifts/Entertainment), FINRA Rule 3270 (Outside Business Activities), and MSRB Rule G-37 (Political Contributions).
ÖncekiSayfa 118 / 118
Tüm alıştırma soruları — FINRA SIE (Securities Industry Essentials) | Examkin