Context: A major metropolitan municipality recently integrated an automated smart-grid electricity distribution system. Shortly after deployment, three densely populated industrial zones began experiencing sporadic, prolonged power blackouts. These unannounced outages are severely damaging sensitive manufacturing equipment and inciting significant public unrest among affected factory workers and owners.
Question: Based on administrative principles, which of the following proposed courses of action logically and practically follow to manage this crisis? (Select all valid actions)
- Issue a directive to temporarily bypass the automated smart-grid routing in the affected zones, relying on legacy manual load-balancing until a comprehensive diagnostic is completed.Cevap
- BInitiate immediate criminal prosecution and permanently terminate all state contracts with the technology vendor to send a strong message against municipal service disruptions.
- Form an independent commission of inquiry, including external grid-resilience experts, to conduct a forensic audit of the software integration and recommend corrective patches.Cevap
- DImmediately disburse interim financial relief to the affected factories from the city's unallocated emergency disaster reserves to bypass lengthy standard claim assessments and quickly pacify unrest.
Cevap
The valid courses of action are to temporarily revert to manual load-balancing and to form an independent commission of inquiry to audit the system.
A valid course of action must be practical, directly address the problem, and adhere to administrative protocols. Temporarily reverting to the legacy manual system immediately mitigates the ongoing crisis of equipment damage and public unrest. Simultaneously, forming an independent commission of inquiry provides a structured, evidence-based approach to diagnosing and resolving the underlying software failure.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Course of Action
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s