Match List-I (Commissions, Committees, and Resolutions on Centre-State Relations) with List-II (Major Recommendations and Proposals) to identify the correct pairings.
- Sarkaria Commission (1983)Recommended that the Governor should be an eminent person from outside the State and a detached figure not closely connected with local politics.
- Rajamannar Committee (1969)Recommended the complete abolition of All-India Services (IAS, IPS, IFS) and the deletion of President's Rule provisions under Article 356.
- Punchhi Commission (2007)Proposed the concept of 'localizing emergency' to confine emergency provisions under Articles 355 and 356 to specific troubled districts or areas rather than the entire State.
- Anandpur Sahib Resolution (1973)Demanded restricting the legislative jurisdiction of the Centre to only four areas: Defence, Foreign Affairs, Communications, and Currency.
Cevap
Sarkaria Commission (1983) matches with the recommendation on Governor appointment guidelines (eminent person from outside the state); Rajamannar Committee (1969) matches with recommending the abolition of All-India Services and deletion of Article 356; Punchhi Commission (2007) matches with proposing the concept of 'localizing emergency'; and Anandpur Sahib Resolution (1973) matches with demanding the restriction of Central power to four subjects (Defence, Foreign Affairs, Communications, and Currency).
Each commission or resolution represents a landmark moment in Indian federalism: Sarkaria Commission (1983) laid down guidelines for appointing Governors as detached, eminent persons; Rajamannar Committee (1969) sought the abolition of All-India Services and Article 356; Punchhi Commission (2007) advocated for 'localizing emergency' to protect state governance; and Anandpur Sahib Resolution (1973) sought to limit central legislation strictly to Defence, Foreign Affairs, Communications, and Currency.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Committees and Commissions on Centre-State Relations