Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaStatement and Arguments

Read the policy proposition below and the argument that follows it.

Proposition: Should the state administration eliminate all in-person citizen service counters and transition exclusively to an online-only portal for government services?

Argument: Yes, because adopting an online-only system will instantly eradicate all forms of bureaucratic corruption and guarantee absolute efficiency across all departments.

Assertion: This argument qualifies as a logically strong argument because it identifies major potential benefits of the transition.

Based on logical reasoning principles, is the final assertion true or false?

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

False
The assertion is false because the provided argument is logically weak. In the context of public policy and administration, a strong argument must be rooted in realistic, proportionate consequences. Claiming that a single policy shift will 'instantly eradicate all forms' of corruption and 'guarantee absolute efficiency' is an extreme, hyperbolic assumption. Because it lacks practical feasibility, it fails to provide sound logical support for the proposition.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the proposed policy in the proposition.
The proposition suggests transitioning all government services to an exclusive online portal, thereby eliminating physical service counters.
Establishing the exact nature of the policy is the first step in evaluating the relevance and realism of the supporting argument.
2
Analyze the claims made in the provided argument.
The argument supports the policy by claiming it will 'instantly eradicate all forms' of corruption and 'guarantee absolute efficiency'.
Breaking down the argument's premise helps identify if it relies on sound logic or hyperbolic assumptions.
3
Evaluate the strength of the argument based on practical reasoning.
The argument is weak. In policy evaluation, arguments that rely on extreme, utopian, or practically impossible outcomes lack logical soundness.
A strong argument must offer realistic, proportionate, and directly linked consequences of a policy rather than exaggerated absolutes.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating argument strength based on realistic outcomes versus extreme or hyperbolic claims.
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Statement and Arguments

Bu konudan daha fazla soru