Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: ZorStatement and Arguments

A state legislative committee is reviewing a new operational mandate. Consider the policy directive and the submitted counter-argument below:

Directive: Should the state government mandate that all public infrastructure procurement contracts be awarded strictly to companies maintaining a 100% remote workforce in order to rapidly reduce carbon emissions?

Argument: No, because essential infrastructure projects such as highway construction and dam maintenance inherently require physical on-site labor and cannot possibly be executed by a remote workforce.

Assertion: This argument is logically weak because it solely addresses the operational feasibility of the action rather than directly refuting the policy's primary environmental goal.

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

False
The assertion is false because the provided counter-argument is logically strong. In administrative reasoning, demonstrating that a blanket policy mandate is operationally impossible to execute exposes a fatal flaw in the directive. This makes it a highly valid refutation, even though it bypasses the environmental intent.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the policy directive's scope and objective.
Scope: All public infrastructure procurement. Objective: Reduce carbon emissions via a 100% remote workforce mandate.
Understanding the exact mechanism and goal of the policy is necessary to evaluate responses.
2
Evaluate the counter-argument's claim.
The argument identifies that infrastructure work (like highway construction) fundamentally requires physical presence, making a blanket remote mandate impossible.
Determines the factual and practical basis of the argument.
3
Assess the logical validity of the counter-argument.
The argument successfully exposes a fatal operational flaw in the policy's mechanism. Therefore, it is a strong argument.
Strong arguments in policy must address feasibility, significant outcomes, or direct relevance.
4
Evaluate the final assertion against the findings.
The assertion claims the argument is weak for not addressing the environmental goal. Since the argument is actually strong, the assertion is false.
Concludes the truth value of the provided statement based on strict logical reasoning.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating the logical strength of arguments based on practical feasibility versus policy intent.
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Statement and Arguments

Bu konudan daha fazla soru