With reference to the Preamble of the Indian Constitution, which of the following statements correctly describes its legal status and amendability as established by the Supreme Court of India in the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case (1973)?
- It is an integral part of the Constitution and can be amended under Article 368, provided its basic structure is not altered.Cevap
- BIt is not considered a part of the Constitution and therefore lies completely outside the scope of parliamentary amendment under Article 368.
- CIt serves as an independent source of power to the legislature and is directly enforceable in a court of law to claim fundamental rights.
- DIt was declared completely unamendable by the Supreme Court, rendering any subsequent constitutional amendments to it null and void.
Cevap
The Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution and can be amended under Article 368, provided its basic structure is not altered.
In the landmark Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case (1973), the Supreme Court of India held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution. The Court further clarified that Parliament can amend the Preamble under Article 368, provided such amendments do not alter or destroy its basic structure.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Legal status and amendability of the Preamble of the Indian Constitution
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s