Soru

Zorluk: OrtaPassage Assumptions and Underlying Premises

Read the following passage carefully:

To reverse the accelerating distress migration of rural youth to metropolitan slums, the Ministry of Skill Development initiated a fully funded vocational training and seed-capital scheme targeting traditional artisans and rural school-leavers. Under this program, certified trainees in non-agricultural trades—such as solar panel maintenance, food processing, and digital logistics—receive an interest-free micro-credit loan to establish localized micro-enterprises within their native districts. Policymakers assert that creating decentralized non-farm employment opportunities in rural peripheries will stabilize regional demographic pressure, elevate household incomes, and reduce the overburdening of urban municipal infrastructure. Opponents argue that urban migration is driven primarily by wage differentials rather than local job availability. However, preliminary evaluations indicate high enrollment rates among young rural adults who previously sought informal urban construction jobs.

Statement: The author's argument that decentralized rural non-farm employment will stabilize regional demographic pressure relies on the underlying assumption that a significant portion of rural youth migrate primarily due to the lack of viable local non-farm livelihoods rather than an intrinsic, unalterable preference for urban lifestyle.

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

True. The claim constitutes a necessary underlying premise for the author's conclusion regarding demographic stabilization.
The claim is TRUE. An underlying assumption is an unstated premise that must hold true for the argument's conclusion to be valid. The author argues that localized non-farm economic opportunities will curb distress migration and stabilize demographic pressure. This argument logically depends on the unstated premise that rural youth migrate primarily because local non-farm livelihoods are absent. If youth migrated due to an absolute preference for metropolitan living, generating local jobs would not stem the migration flow, undermining the author's central claim.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the author's core conclusion and proposed mechanism
The author concludes that creating decentralized rural non-farm micro-enterprises will stabilize regional demographic pressure by reducing distress migration to cities.
Understanding the cause-and-effect structure of the passage is necessary to isolate implicit premises.
2
Identify the unstated bridge between the mechanism and the outcome
The policy mechanism (providing local non-farm jobs) can only produce the outcome (reduced migration) if lack of local jobs is a primary reason youth migrate.
An assumption is an unstated premise required to bridge the gap between the evidence/action and the conclusion.
3
Apply the negation test to verify necessity
Negating the statement gives: 'Rural youth migrate due to an intrinsic preference for urban life, regardless of local non-farm options.' If this negated statement is true, local job creation will fail to stabilize demographic pressure. Hence, the original assumption is logically required.
If negating an assumption invalidates the author's conclusion, that assumption is strictly necessary.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Necessary Assumptions in Policy Passages via the Negation Test
Bu soruyu puanla