Situation: A recent internal government audit highlighted that a substantial portion of the budget allocated for a critical rural drinking water initiative remains unutilized. The audit noted that the primary cause is the inability of assigned local contractors to operate the newly procured, advanced purification machinery due to a lack of technical training.
Statement: A logically sound and administratively appropriate course of action in response to this audit would be to immediately cancel the rural drinking water initiative and reallocate all the remaining funds to urban infrastructure projects.
Cevap: Cevap
Cevap
The statement is false. An appropriate administrative course of action must target the specific root cause (lack of training) rather than abandoning an essential public welfare project in response to a correctable operational bottleneck.
The statement evaluates to false because the proposed action violates the core principle of administrative proportionality. When confronted with an operational bottleneck—in this case, a correctable lack of technical training—a logically sound course of action must involve implementing targeted remedies, such as capacity-building workshops or hiring specialized personnel. Completely abandoning an essential rural utility project is an extreme, defeatist measure that punishes the intended beneficiaries while failing entirely to address the actual competency issue.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Evaluating Administrative Proportionality and Root Cause Resolution