Soru

Read the following passage carefully:

In response to the escalating intensity of urban heat islands (UHIs) in metropolitan zones, the State Urban Planning Commission has proposed a paradigm shift in municipal zoning regulations, focusing on 'thermal equity.' Historically, zoning laws prioritized economic density, inadvertently creating vast heat-trapping concrete networks in low-income neighborhoods where industrial and residential zones intersect. The new policy mandates the integration of 'cool corridors'—continuous networks of high-albedo surfaces and drought-resistant urban forestry—into all future commercial developments. Furthermore, developers seeking permits for high-density commercial complexes must now achieve a 'thermal neutrality' score, compensating for localized temperature increases by retrofitting adjacent public infrastructure with green roofs or permeable pavements. Critics argue that this mandate imposes prohibitive costs on local businesses and will stifle urban revitalization. However, the Commission asserts that the long-term reduction in public health crises related to heat stress and the decreased strain on the municipal power grid during peak summer months will economically outweigh the initial compliance costs. To enforce this, the municipality will deploy a network of micro-climate sensors to monitor the thermal impact of newly completed projects over a five-year period, penalizing non-compliance with escalating property tax assessments. The policy framework inherently assumes that private developers will internalize these environmental externalities rather than abandoning urban projects for unregulated suburban areas.

Based on the policy framework outlined in the passage, which of the following administrative actions would most logically follow as a practical extension of the Commission's 'thermal equity' mandate?