Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaPassage Assumptions and Underlying Premises

Read the passage given below and answer the question that follows:

To safeguard downstream metropolitan drinking water reservoirs from severe siltation and seasonal shortages, several regional water boards have proposed implementing a Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) scheme. Under this program, urban municipal utilities will transfer a small surcharge levied on city water bills directly to upstream agrarian communities. In return, rural landowners must adopt sustainable land-use practices, such as terracing steep slopes, restricting livestock grazing near riverbanks, and reforesting degraded catchments. Proponents argue that compensating upstream farmers for ecosystem stewardship is significantly cheaper than constructing mega-filtration plants or dredging silt-clogged reservoirs downstream. By aligning economic incentives across rural and urban boundaries, the scheme aims to secure long-term water quality while simultaneously supplementing rural livelihoods. Therefore, introducing this downstream-to-upstream payment mechanism represents the most viable financial model for ensuring urban water security in ecological crisis zones.

Which one of the following options best reflects the most crucial assumption on which the author's argument rests?

  1. Financial compensation provided through urban surcharges will effectively motivate upstream landowners to modify their traditional land management practices.Cevap
  2. B
    Constructing mega-filtration plants downstream requires higher capital expenditure than compensating upstream communities.
  3. C
    Urban residents in metropolitan areas are overwhelmingly willing to accept higher utility bills for environmental protection.
  4. D
    Traditional agricultural practices in upper catchments represent the sole cause of seasonal water scarcity in urban reservoirs.

Cevap

Financial compensation provided through urban surcharges will effectively motivate upstream landowners to modify their traditional land management practices.
The author argues that transferring municipal water surcharges to upstream farmers will secure urban water quality by prompting sustainable land practices. For this cause-and-effect relationship to work, the author must implicitly assume that financial compensation acts as an effective motivator for farmers to alter their existing land-use behaviors. Negating this claim breaks the logical connection between financial transfers and improved watershed management.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the author's main conclusion
The main conclusion is that introducing a downstream-to-upstream payment mechanism (PES) is the most viable financial model for ensuring urban water security.
The author explicitly frames this as the final takeaway of the proposal.
2
Identify the stated premises connecting the mechanism to the outcome
Urban surcharges fund rural farmers to perform terracing, reforestation, and grazing restrictions, which protects reservoirs from siltation at a lower cost than downstream engineering solutions.
Understanding the logical chain reveals what bridge must exist between payment and ecological action.
3
Apply the Negation Test to find the unstated necessary premise
Negating the statement that financial payouts will motivate farmers to change land-use practices implies farmers will take the money without changing practices or refuse to participate. Consequently, no watershed restoration occurs, rendering the payment scheme ineffective for securing water security.
If negating an option destroys the validity of the conclusion, that option is the required underlying assumption.

Anahtar Kavram

Passage Assumptions and Underlying Premises
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Passage Assumptions and Underlying Premises

Bu konudan daha fazla soru