Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaPassage Assumptions and Underlying Premises

Read the following passage carefully:

"To reverse land degradation and combat declining groundwater tables in semi-arid agricultural zones, several regional development authorities have introduced financial subsidies for smallholder farmers adopting agro-forestry practices. Under this scheme, farmers receive direct annual cash transfers for integrating native nitrogen-fixing tree species alongside seasonal millet crops. Proponents contend that establishing multi-tiered canopy cover reduces evaporative moisture loss from the soil and restores organic carbon levels over a five-year cycle. However, field evaluations indicate that adoption rates remain sub-optimal among tenant farmers, who rent land on short-term annual leases. Because tree species require three to four years to mature and yield tangible micro-climatic and soil-enrichment benefits, tenant farmers hesitate to invest labour and land capital into long-term ecological improvements that primarily accrue to non-resident landowners. Consequently, policymakers are considering extending minimum lease duration mandates to align tenant security with the gestation period of agro-forestry interventions."

Statement: The author's suggestion to extend minimum lease duration mandates rests on the implicit assumption that tenure insecurity is a primary bottleneck preventing tenant farmers from investing in agro-forestry initiatives.

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

True. The proposed policy intervention of mandating longer lease durations logically depends on the unstated premise that tenure insecurity is a major factor deterring tenant farmers from adopting agro-forestry.
The statement is true because the passage attributes sub-optimal adoption among tenant farmers to their short-term annual leases ending before trees mature. Therefore, advocating for longer minimum lease duration mandates inherently assumes that tenure insecurity is a primary bottleneck and that providing security of tenure will enable and encourage agro-forestry adoption.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core argument and proposed policy solution in the passage.
The passage states that tenant farmers on annual leases avoid agro-forestry due to the 3-4 year maturation timeline of trees, leading policymakers to consider mandating longer minimum lease durations.
Understanding how the proposed solution connects to the observed problem is necessary to identify implicit premises.
2
Apply the Negation Test to the statement.
If tenure insecurity were NOT a primary bottleneck (for instance, if tenant farmers abstained solely due to seedling costs or lack of market access regardless of lease length), then extending minimum lease durations would fail to boost adoption rates.
If negating a claim invalidates the author's proposed solution, that claim is a necessary underlying assumption.
3
Conclude whether the statement is a necessary assumption.
Because the validity of the policy proposal hinges on tenure security enabling long-term investment by tenants, the statement constitutes an indispensable underlying premise.
Confirming the necessity of this unstated premise verifies that the statement is True.

Anahtar Kavram

Passage Assumptions and Underlying Premises
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Passage Assumptions and Underlying Premises

Bu konudan daha fazla soru