Soru

Zorluk: KolayPassage Assumptions and Underlying Premises

Read the following passage carefully:

"In several drought-prone regions, local administration initiatives promoting micro-irrigation systems, such as drip and sprinkler networks, have shown significant water-saving benefits. By delivering water directly to crop roots, micro-irrigation reduces evaporation and surface runoff compared to traditional flood irrigation. However, agricultural extensions report that smallholder farmers often revert to flood irrigation after initial project subsidies expire. The primary factor behind this trend is the high recurring maintenance cost of filter units and pump components, which smallholders struggle to fund without continuous institutional financial assistance. Therefore, achieving sustained water conservation through micro-irrigation requires creating accessible, low-cost maintenance support mechanisms alongside initial equipment subsidies."

Statement: The author's argument assumes that initial subsidies on micro-irrigation equipment alone are insufficient to guarantee long-term water conservation in drought-prone regions.

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

True
The statement correctly reflects the essential assumption underlying the author's argument. Since the author advocates for maintenance support in addition to initial subsidies because farmers drop micro-irrigation after initial subsidies end, the author must assume that initial equipment subsidies alone are inadequate for long-term success.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the author's main conclusion and premise in the passage.
The main conclusion is that sustained water conservation requires establishing low-cost maintenance support alongside initial equipment subsidies. The premise is that farmers revert to flood irrigation after initial subsidies end because they cannot afford recurring maintenance.
Understanding the logical connection between the premise and conclusion is necessary to isolate the underlying assumption.
2
Apply the negation test to the statement.
Negating the statement gives: 'Initial subsidies alone are sufficient to guarantee long-term water conservation.' If this were true, farmers would not need ongoing maintenance support mechanisms, which contradicts the passage's evidence that farmers revert to flood irrigation due to maintenance costs.
An assumption is a necessary unstated premise; if its negation invalidates the conclusion, the assumption is valid.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying implicit premises and necessary assumptions in passage-based critical reasoning arguments.
Tahmini Süre:50s
Bu soruyu puanla