Soru

Zorluk: OrtaPassage Assumptions and Underlying Premises

Read the following passage carefully:

To alleviate the severe environmental and financial strain of overflowing regional landfills, municipal corporations across several tier-two cities have launched a scheme subsidizing neighborhood-level decentralized composting units. Under this model, residential welfare associations receive financial assistance and technical support to treat organic waste at source, significantly reducing the volume of refuse transported to central dumpsites. Policy planners assert that diverting biodegradable waste prior to municipal collection will simultaneously lower vehicular transit emissions, reduce municipal fuel expenditures, and extend the operational lifespan of existing landfill infrastructure. However, civic activists highlight that previous municipal environmental initiatives suffered from low public compliance and chronic maintenance lapses once initial capital subsidies lapsed. For this decentralized composting initiative to achieve its projected fiscal and environmental targets, residents must consistently segregate waste at the household level and actively participate in facility upkeep.

Statement: A necessary underlying assumption of the policy planners' argument is that organic waste constitutes a significant enough portion of total residential refuse that its at-source diversion will substantially reduce overall landfill load.

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

True. The statement correctly identifies a necessary implicit premise required for the policy planners' argument to hold.
The statement is True because the policy planners' conclusion—that at-source organic waste composting will extend landfill lifespan and lower transit costs—depends on the unstated premise that organic waste forms a significant portion of overall residential refuse. Applying the negation test confirms this: if organic waste were only a minor fraction of overall waste, processing it at neighborhood units would not meaningfully diminish the total volume arriving at landfills, defeating the policy objectives.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the central argument and intended outcomes in the passage.
The policy planners contend that deploying decentralized composting units for organic waste will reduce municipal transit emissions, cut fuel costs, and extend landfill lifespan.
Determining the core cause-and-effect structure of the argument is essential before isolating implicit assumptions.
2
Identify the unstated logical bridge connecting the action to the outcome.
The proposed intervention targets organic waste specifically. For this targeted intervention to deliver substantial reductions in total landfill volume, organic waste must comprise a major component of total residential refuse.
An underlying assumption is an unstated premise necessary to link the proposed cause (composting organic waste) with the claimed effect (extended landfill lifespan).
3
Apply the negation test to verify necessity.
Negating the statement implies that organic waste is an insignificant fraction of total waste. If true, composting organic waste would have virtually no impact on landfill capacity, invalidating the planners' targets.
If negating a statement invalidates the main conclusion, that statement is a necessary underlying assumption.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Unstated Premises via the Negation Test
Bu soruyu puanla