For each proposed research investigation below, identify the corresponding epidemiologic study design being utilized.
- Researchers identify patients who received either a drug-eluting or bare-metal coronary stent between 2015 and 2018, then review their electronic health records through 2025 to compare the rates of subsequent in-stent restenosis.Retrospective cohort study
- Investigators enroll 2,000 healthy nulliparous women at their first prenatal visit, stratify them by initial body mass index, and follow them forward in time until delivery to determine the incidence of preeclampsia.Prospective cohort study
- A team randomly selects 500 outpatients attending a dermatology clinic today and uses a questionnaire and physical exam to simultaneously assess their current daily sunscreen use and the presence of actinic keratoses.Cross-sectional study
- From an ongoing 15-year longitudinal study of cardiovascular health, researchers identify 50 patients who recently developed amyloidosis and compare their baseline banked serum protein levels to those of 200 disease-free participants from the same study.Nested case-control study
Cevap
The stent study is a retrospective cohort; the prenatal BMI study is a prospective cohort; the dermatology study is cross-sectional; the amyloidosis biomarker study is a nested case-control.
Each study design fundamentally aligns with the timing of exposure and outcome measurement. Cohort studies follow exposures to outcomes (prospectively in real-time, or retrospectively via records). Cross-sectional studies measure both at a single point. Nested case-control studies use outcomes to select patients from an established cohort to look back at baseline exposures.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Epidemiologic study designs are differentiated by their participant sampling strategy (exposure vs. outcome vs. simultaneous) and their temporal direction (prospective vs. retrospective).
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s