Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaInterprofessional Teamwork and Conflict Resolution

A surgical technologist is assisting during an open exploratory laparotomy. Before the initial incision is made, the technologist observes the attending surgeon accidentally contaminate their sterile sleeve by brushing against an unsterile equipment monitor. The surgeon appears unaware of the breach and asks the technologist to hand them the scalpel. According to high-reliability organization principles and standardized conflict resolution frameworks, arrange the following actions the technologist should take in the correct chronological order to address this safety concern, assuming the surgeon is dismissive or resistant at each step.

  1. 1Directly inform the surgeon that their sleeve contacted an unsterile surface.
  2. 2Restate the observation using structured, assertive language (e.g., 'I am concerned about a break in the sterile field').
  3. 3Withhold the scalpel and notify the operating room charge nurse to intervene.
  4. 4Escalate the unresolved breach to the Chief of Surgery or the on-call medical director.
  5. 5Submit a formal event report through the institutional patient safety system.

Cevap

The correct sequence is to first directly notify the surgeon, then use standardized assertive language if ignored, followed by escalating to the charge nurse, then to the medical director if needed, and finally filing an incident report after the case.
The correct sequence follows established high-reliability organization principles, specifically the Two-Challenge Rule and the formal chain of command. When a safety breach is observed, the first step is always direct, professional communication. If dismissed, the second step is a firmer assertion using standardized safety language (e.g., CUS: Concerned, Uncomfortable, Safety). If the individual still does not comply, the team member must 'stop the line' and escalate to immediate unit leadership, followed by departmental medical leadership if necessary. Only after the immediate clinical threat is resolved should a formal safety event report be filed.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Issue the first challenge.
The surgeon is made aware of the potential error directly and professionally.
Most medical errors are unintentional; a direct, non-confrontational alert usually resolves the issue immediately without needing escalation.
2
Issue the second challenge using standardized safety language.
The surgeon is clearly notified that this is a recognized safety issue, not just a casual observation.
If the first alert is dismissed, the Two-Challenge Rule requires a firmer restatement using keywords (like 'Concerned' or 'Safety') to trigger a mandatory pause.
3
Escalate to immediate unit leadership (Charge Nurse).
The local chain of command is activated to mediate the dispute and prevent patient harm.
When peer-to-peer resolution fails, immediate supervisors must intervene before the unsafe act (making the incision) occurs.
4
Escalate to departmental medical leadership.
The Chief of Surgery or Medical Director provides definitive authority to override the unsafe behavior.
If the attending physician refuses to comply with unit leadership, administrative medical authority is required to enforce safety standards.
5
File an institutional safety report.
The event is officially documented for the hospital's quality improvement committee.
Retrospective reporting ensures systemic issues are reviewed, but it must only occur after the immediate threat to the patient has been mitigated.

Anahtar Kavram

Standardized escalation of patient safety concerns using the Two-Challenge Rule and Chain of Command.
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Interprofessional Teamwork and Conflict Resolution

Bu konudan daha fazla soru