Match each clinical scenario or hospital intervention with the correct patient safety concept or level of the hierarchy of safety controls.
- A clinician accidentally orders a 10-fold overdose of an anticoagulant due to a misplaced decimal point during a hectic night shift.Active error (Sharp-end failure)
- Look-alike vials of high-alert medications are routinely stocked in adjacent bins within the automated dispensing cabinets.Latent condition (Blunt-end failure)
- Medical gas wall outlets are engineered with unique geometric pin shapes that physically prevent connecting an oxygen line to a nitrogen port.Forcing function (Strong intervention)
- The surgical department implements a mandatory uniform preoperative timeout protocol to be used universally before any procedural incision.Standardization (Intermediate intervention)
- Following a near-miss incident, hospital leadership emails a bulletin to all clinical staff reminding them to verify patient identities more carefully.Education and training (Weak intervention)
Cevap
The correct matches align individual frontline mistakes with active errors, system vulnerabilities with latent conditions, and safety interventions with their respective strength in the hierarchy of controls.
Correct matching requires understanding both the etiology of medical errors and the effectiveness of subsequent interventions. Active errors happen at the sharp end (the operator level), while latent conditions are systemic flaws at the blunt end. When designing interventions during Root Cause Analysis, forcing functions (which physically prevent the error) are the strongest. Standardization is of intermediate strength, and training/reminders are the weakest because they do not address the underlying systemic risks.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Hierarchy of Safety Controls and Error Classification