A 62-year-old woman presents to the clinic for follow-up after an incidental pancreatic cystic lesion was discovered on an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan. The initial CT was performed in the emergency department for an episode of uncomplicated diverticulitis, which has since fully resolved. She currently reports no abdominal pain, nausea, weight loss, or jaundice. Her past medical history is notable for hypertension, and she does not consume alcohol. Physical examination is unremarkable. Laboratory studies, including serum amylase, lipase, and CA 19-9, are within normal limits.
To better characterize the lesion, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the pancreas with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is performed. The MRI reveals a 3.5-cm, well-circumscribed, lobulated lesion in the head of the pancreas consisting of a cluster of numerous small cysts (each less than 5 mm in diameter), creating a "honeycomb" appearance. A central stellate scar with delayed contrast enhancement is also present. There is no communication between the cystic lesion and the main pancreatic duct, and the main pancreatic duct is not dilated.
Based on the interpretation of these imaging findings, which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- Routine clinical observationCevap
- BEndoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration
- CPancreaticoduodenectomy
- DEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with transmural drainage
- EPercutaneous catheter drainage and intravenous antibiotics
Cevap
SCAs are characterized radiographically by a well-circumscribed cluster of numerous small cysts (microcystic or "honeycomb" appearance) and a central stellate scar that often shows delayed contrast enhancement or central calcification on CT. Crucially, they do not communicate with the main pancreatic duct. SCAs are benign neoplasms with an exceedingly rare rate of malignant transformation (< 1%). Therefore, for asymptomatic patients, the standard of care is routine clinical observation. Surgical resection is indicated only if the lesion grows large enough to cause symptoms via mass effect, such as biliary obstruction or gastric outlet obstruction. Because the imaging is pathognomonic, invasive diagnostic procedures like EUS-FNA are not indicated.